sembr.live
中

Fed Watch

Hammack's Multi-Hike Push vs. Disinflation Countdown: 30Y at 19-Year High, Sept Odds ~45–51%, Cook-Removal Battle, Oil Rebound — Wednesday's CPI the Sole Arbiter

Beth Hammack's multi-hike demand and Trump's renewed push to remove Governor Lisa Cook hardened the hawkish/political layer overnight, but with September hike odds clustered around 45–51%, the 30-year at a 19-year high of 5.28%, and oil back near $90 on stalled Hormuz talks, Wednesday's July CPI remains the single arbiter of the rate path .

53 sources ~43 min

0. Weekly Arc

The payrolls shock’s dovish repricing — September odds collapsing from roughly 67% to about 45–51% — is now being contested from three directions: Hammack’s multi-hike hawkish push, Trump’s renewed Cook-removal challenge to Fed independence, and an oil rebound on stalled Hormuz talks that lifted the 30-year to a 19-year high of 5.28%. HSBC, Goldman, Morgan Stanley and Citi argue the market over-priced hawkishness. Wednesday’s July CPI and the late-August core PCE decide whether the easing trade survives.

1. Policy Narrative & Expectations

The net change over the past ~24h is a hawkish re-hardening on the margins against an entrenched dovish institutional camp. Overnight, Cleveland Fed President Hammack — a July dissenter — publicly pressed for multiple hikes (“now is the time to act”) [1], the White House formally moved to remove Governor Lisa Cook [2], and stalled US-Iran peace talks lifted oil and Treasury yields to month highs [3][4]. Futures markets still price only ~45% for a September 25bp hike [5], CME FedWatch shows 51.2% [6], and Reuters calls the September 15–16 meeting “basically a coin toss” with ~75% priced by the midterms [2]. HSBC, Goldman, Morgan Stanley and Citi all argue the market over-priced the Fed’s hawkish stance and that a benign CPI would force aggressive pricing out of the curve [7][8][9][10]. The debate has collapsed to one number: July core CPI on Wednesday — at or below +0.2% m/m means consistency with the 2% target; above it is a policy-pressure signal [11].

1.1 FOMC Officials’ Remarks

  • [NEW] Hawkish — Beth Hammack (Cleveland Fed President, 2026 FOMC voter): per Bloomberg, “it’s possible a number of interest rate hikes may be needed to bring inflation down to the central bank’s 2% target,” while declining to prejudge the endpoint [12]; per Wallstreetcn (华尔街见闻), a single 25bp hike “would have a negligible impact on the economy,” so “more than one hike may be needed” [13]. She called the current 3.50%–3.75% range “not materially restrictive,” said “now is the time to act” [1][14][15], warned “the longer the Fed waits, the harder it will be to bring inflation back to 2%” [16], and argued “markets can only assist the Fed; they cannot replace Fed action” [16]. The soft July jobs report “will not change her focus on inflation” [16]. She dissented at the July FOMC in favor of a 25bp hike [13][16]. Note: several of her flashes are single-source social posts (8/10 18:46 UTC) [17][14][15][18]; she is scheduled to speak again later this week [19]. Marginal shift: converts her recorded dissent into a public multi-hike campaign — the day’s dominant hawkish signal.
  • [ONGOING] Hawkish — Governors Chris Waller and Lisa Cook: both voted to hold last month but indicated the Fed may have to tighten to get above-target inflation back to its 2% goal [2].
  • [ESCALATED] Chair Kevin Warsh (listed separately): per Nick Timiraos (WSJ), the two inflation reports over the next month will determine whether his colleagues push a September hike or extend the pause — a mild July CPI eases pressure on him, while hot data could force him to “prove through an actual rate hike” the point he argued at length but failed to make clear in July [20][11]. The WSJ details that at the July press conference his answer on hiking was “vague and evasive” — suggesting higher bond yields had partly substituted for monetary tightening and hinting at possibly redefining the Fed’s inflation target — and that 10 of 19 participants, including half of the 12 voters, later spoke publicly to supplement his logic [11]; people familiar with him acknowledge the communication breakdown needs repair, with Jackson Hole a suitable window [11]. Bloomberg’s column adds that his main problem is “an unwillingness to share his thoughts about how he would adjust monetary policy to changes in the economic outlook,” while judging the removal of forward guidance itself desirable [21]. Marginal shift: no change in the hawkish-words/dovish-execution pattern, but the credibility-repair pressure is now explicitly tied to the next two CPI prints.

1.2 Policy Signals & Institutional Communication

  • [NEW] Fed-independence battle — Cook removal: the White House sent a letter saying Trump is “considering” removing Fed Governor Lisa Cook, demanding a response within three weeks to what her attorney calls “baseless” mortgage-fraud allegations; a June Supreme Court ruling recognized the Fed’s special statutory protections but left unresolved whether the allegations constitute grounds for removal [2]. Context: Trump has called Warsh repeatedly since taking office in May, calling him “brilliant” while adding, “he’s got a board, and it’s a political board, and they want to keep rates up” [2].
  • [NEW] National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett: per Jim Bianco’s social relay (single-source/unverified), “if I were at the Fed right now, I would either hold steady or cut rates because there’s so much supply-side momentum” [22]; per Jin10 (金十) he also said that if he were on the Fed he would definitely hold or cut in September, and moved to clarify speculation over the governor-removal and succession story [23].
  • [NEW] Citi’s Global Central Bank Monitor: global policy has shifted from broad easing to a tightening bias — Citi expects 12 of 27 major central banks to hike in 2026 (7 hold, 8 cut) and raised end-2026 rate forecasts for the US to 3.25%, the euro area to 2.50% and the UK to 3.75%, with BOJ normalization to 1.25% [24].
  • [NEW] Goldman on the communication regime: reduced Fed forward guidance will increase FX volatility, especially front-end; FOMC “hidden dissents” correlate with higher FX volatility at subsequent data releases; the Bank of Canada precedent shows communication shifts change volatility structure [25].
  • [ONGOING] BofA: maintains its 75bp 2026 hiking forecast, arguing Warsh’s reduced guidance adds uncertainty and lifts risk premia but is not deliberate long-end manipulation — policy remains short-rate-driven [26].
  • [NEW] BofA positioning: post-FOMC flows favor the short end with a steeper-curve bias; active bond funds made their largest weekly duration cut in three years and the short-end short is crowded — a benign CPI could force a squeeze and a short-end rally [27].
  • [NEW] HSBC: the market has over-priced the Fed’s hawkish stance and the “US exceptionalism” narrative; nowcasts point to mild Wednesday CPI, which would further weaken hike expectations, trigger a bull-steepening, and potentially return a Goldilocks regime supportive of risk assets [10].
  • [NEW] Citi FX stance: USD trades with a “hawkish asymmetry” into CPI — markets price hawkish risk and leveraged funds are short USD — but Citi’s modal base case is dovish; a weak CPI could quickly remove the hike premium from the Fed curve [7][28].
  • [NEW] JPMorgan cyclical outlook: sticky core inflation (core PCE 3.1% by end-2026; fed funds 4.0% in Q4 2026 vs 3.8% Taylor-rule implied) keeps a further hike possible, but the weak July employment report tempers any impulse; the bigger risk flagged is strong growth failing to translate into labor-income gains [29][30].

2. Key Data & Market Read

  • [ONGOING] July nonfarm payrolls — sharply below expectations: -23k versus +80k expected, with May and June revised down a combined 103k and a three-month average near 20k [31][32][26][33]; the unemployment rate fell to 4.1% only because participation dropped to 61.4% [31][32]. Market read: the dovish shock that trimmed September odds from ~60% to ~45% [5]; Citi reads the ~20k–30k monthly average as contradicting the “overheating” narrative [28]. Wage readings conflict slightly by source (AHE +0.05% m/m to 3.15% y/y per Wallstreetcn [31] vs +0.1% m/m and +3.2% y/y per BofA [26]).
  • [ONGOING] July CPI preview — Wednesday, August 12: consensus headline 3.4% y/y / +0.1% m/m, core 2.5% y/y / +0.2% m/m [5][31][34]; the week’s top macro event for many traders [20]; BLS releases it 8:30 ET [35][34].
  • [NEW] Citi’s CPI scenario framework: consensus core +0.2% m/m with downside risk to +0.1% [7]; a print near +0.16% / 2.4–2.5% y/y “would make a September hike — indeed any 2026 hike — hard to justify,” while +0.25% or higher keeps hike risk alive into the August CPI on September 11 [28].
  • [NEW] BofA and JPMorgan forecasts: economists expect core services inflation +0.3% m/m, which BofA says “keeps the possibility of a September hike alive” [5]; BofA forecasts core CPI +0.20% m/m (2.5% y/y) and core PCE +0.24% m/m (3.3% y/y) [26][27]; JPMorgan sees headline +0.12% and core +0.22% m/m [30].
  • [NEW] Goldman’s Wage Tracker: US wage growth slowed to 3.6% y/y in Q2 — labor-market tightness cooling, easing core-inflation pressure and giving the Fed room for policy adjustment [36].
  • [ONGOING] Narrative impact: the disinflation camp (HSBC nowcasts, Citi’s modal case, Goldman, Morgan Stanley’s hold call) and the hawkish camp (Hammack’s multi-hike push, BofA’s core-services rebound call, the oil rebound to ~$90) are exactly 180 degrees apart, and Wednesday’s core CPI settles it [5][37][13][10]; JPMorgan warns of significant US equity volatility into the release, and options traders price a notable S&P move with the actual swing possibly larger [38][35].

3. Financial-Conditions Signals

  • [ESCALATED] Rates: the 30-year reached 5.28% — a new 19-year high (8/11 08:26 UTC, per Jim Bianco) [4][22]; the 10-year rose 3bp to 4.7334% and the 2-year over 2bp to 4.2597% in early trade [4][39]; US, UK and eurozone government bond yields rose to their highest this month as stalled peace talks drove oil higher [3][40]. Last week’s relief leg (10Y -10bp to 4.65%) is being retraced [32].
  • [ESCALATED] Oil/energy driver: Brent +2.4% to $89.81 (8/11 05:55 ET) [39]; Iran made tough demands to reopen Hormuz, pushing oil futures up 1.5% [40]; the rebound has put inflation and bond-yield risks back at the center of market focus [37].
  • [ONGOING] Gold: advanced above $4,400/oz after +3.6% over two sessions [41], following last week’s ~7% surge [32][42]; the driver narrative is real rates, positioning and capital-return flows rather than pure safe-haven demand, with continued central-bank buying noted [43][34].
  • [NEW] Dollar & long-end driver: DXY is oscillating near 99.5 support after a double top at 101.8; the July CPI is the watershed for a smooth dollar downtrend [44]; Citi keeps short EURUSD / long USDJPY into the print, flagging leveraged USD shorts near the year’s prior maximum — a USD-positive outcome could trigger short-covering [7].
  • [NEW] Credit & liquidity: US IG funds took in $9.2bn last week, HY inflows were the strongest since April 2025 and money-market funds +$51.8bn; AI-related bond issuance reached $344bn YTD and was absorbed smoothly, including Alphabet’s $25bn deal [26]. The global FCI (ex-Russia) loosened 9bp last week on lower long rates [36], the US Bloomberg FCI improved to 1.334 [33], and JPMorgan global BB-B dollar spreads tightened ~8bp w/w [33].
  • [NEW] Term-premium/real-rate layer: Haitong International attributes the post-FOMC climb in long-end yields to rigidly rising real rates on resilient US growth, layered with a credibility/term-premium element, and flags heavy Treasury-put buying as amplifying liquidity risk [45]; BofA keeps 10Y medium-term technical targets at 5.50%–5.75% (longer-term 6.25%) [26].

4. Global Central-Bank Linkages

  • [ONGOING] RBA: held as expected (~97% priced), fine-tuning guidance to signal inflation risks tilted to the upside without committing to further tightening [46][47]; Australia’s four major banks see the hiking cycle as peaked, with an extended hold before easing [48]; JPMorgan sees the next move as a cut in H2 2027 [30].
  • [NEW] BOJ / intervention mechanics: Fed data show no evidence Japan used Treasury liquidation proceeds for the yen intervention — officials drew on FIMA repo proceeds instead, limiting broader market spillovers [8][9][27]; Goldman sizes the operation at up to $85bn of yen bought July 30–31, the largest two-day move since 2011, and expects yen strength to fade [8]; Morgan Stanley keeps October 2026 + March 2027 hikes (terminal 1.5%), argues the yen’s medium-term path depends more on the Fed than on the BOJ or intervention, and recommends short USD/JPY [9]; Citi sees the BOJ at 1.25% by end-2026 [24]; JPMorgan expects the next hike in October with September possible [30]; BofA warns the BOJ would face high pressure if the Fed hikes in September [49].
  • [NEW] ECB: HSBC expects another September hike [50]; Citi raised its end-2026 deposit-rate forecast to 2.50% from 1.50% [24]; JPMorgan projects 2.5% in Q4 2026 with euro-area core CPI at 3.1% [29].
  • [NEW] PBoC: JPMorgan expects a rate cut by year-end in response to low inflation (China July CPI -0.4% m/m) [30]; Goldman sees the RMB undervalued by at least 20% and expects policymakers to allow gradual appreciation [8].
  • [NEW] Others: HSBC expects the BOE on hold while the ECB and BOJ hike, with the Fed caught in between [50]; Goldman notes UK hike pricing is more hawkish than its baseline, a possible GBP headwind [8]; Norges Bank expected to hold after a below-consensus core CPI [30].

5. Asset Implications

This section is inference — anchored to the facts above.

QuadrantCurrent probability tiltKey asset implicationAnchoring narrative
Growth↑ + Inflation↑Unchanged-to-risingThe oil rebound plus JPMorgan’s above-potential growth (2.6% annualized through mid-2027) and sticky core (PCE 3.1% end-2026) keeps the reflation bid alive; commodities/TIPS are the cleaner expression while Hammack’s hike push and the 5.28% 30-year cap long nominal bonds§1.1 / §1.2 / §3
Growth↑ + Inflation↓RisingThe Goldilocks camp (HSBC, Goldman, Morgan Stanley, Citi’s modal case): benign CPI → bull-steepening, risk assets rebound, S&P breakout and record breadth hold; long-end yields are the named constraint§1.2 / §2 / §3
Growth↓ + Inflation↑Rising (tail)The stagflation pair — soft payrolls, core PCE still ~3.3%, oil near $90 — with Hammack explicitly arguing the Fed should act into it; gold and commodities hedge, equities bear the CPI risk§1.1 / §2 / §3
Growth↓ + Inflation↓RisingThe dominant disinflation read (HSBC nowcasts, Citi’s 0.16% core scenario, Goldman’s wage tracker): front-end duration and gold benefit as real rates fall; a benign CPI squeezes the crowded short-end short§2 / §3

Stock-bond correlation call: The long end remains in the inflation-driven (positive-correlation) format — the 30-year at a 19-year high, real-rate/term-premium drivers, Bessent yield-cap anxiety and BofA’s 5.50%–5.75% technical targets all encode stocks and long bonds falling together into the CPI print. The front end, by contrast, is positioned for a growth-driven bull-steepener: HSBC’s sentiment dashboard shows a rising number of buy signals, active funds just made their largest weekly duration cut in three years, and CTA shorts are crowded. The regime is therefore split by curve segment and bimodal around Wednesday: a benign core print (≤ +0.2% m/m) flips the whole curve toward negative correlation — bonds hedge equities, the dollar weakens, gold extends; a hot core-services print (+0.3% as BofA expects) re-locks the long end in the positive-correlation format and validates Hammack’s multi-hike push.

Risk-budget implication: Overweight gold — the rare two-sided expression in either regime: benign CPI lowers real rates (Soochow’s model maps a 100bp TIPS decline to roughly a $1,600/oz gold gain), while a stagflation surprise and the renewed dollar-credit risk premium (Cook-removal politics, Fed-independence pressure) support it directly. Overweight front-end/belly duration tactically — the crowded short-end short and HSBC’s bull-steepening call make a benign CPI a high-payoff squeeze; but size it as a two-day CPI trade given Hammack and the ~51% September price. Underweight long-end nominal duration until the credibility question resolves — the 5.28% 30-year, BofA’s 5.50%–5.75% target and Barclays’ “long end dramatically underpricing” warning dominate. In credit, stay in high-quality spread products (IG, securitized) and avoid private-credit CCC exposures, which BofA sees with only 0.7x cash-flow coverage. In FX, express dollar weakness via the HSBC/Morgan Stanley dovish-turn logic rather than the intervention narrative; Citi’s hawkish-asymmetry warning (short-covering into a hot CPI) argues for options over spot.

6. Contrarian & Tail Risks

  • Consensus fragility — the September price is a cluster, not a point: ~45% (fed-funds futures per Yicai) [5] vs 51.2% (CME FedWatch) [6] vs “basically a coin toss” with ~75% priced by the midterms (Reuters) [2]; market expectations are judged likely to only push a hike from September to October, with one 2026 hike still not fully excluded [31]. The hold camp (HSBC, Goldman, Morgan Stanley, Citi’s modal case) and the hike camp (Hammack, JPMorgan, BofA’s 75bp path) are mutually exclusive, and Wednesday’s core CPI — Citi’s 0.16% downside vs BofA/JPMorgan’s 0.20–0.22% and the +0.3% core-services call — settles it. If Waller and Cook both vote for a hike next month, the previous 9-3 hold majority becomes 7-5 [2].
  • Consensus fragility — the long end: Barclays warns that if July marked the beginning of a deterioration in confidence about the Fed’s willingness to defend the inflation target, “the long end is dramatically under-pricing the risk” [2]; BofA’s technical targets and the 5.28% 30-year sit on the same side.
  • Second-order — Cook removal / Fed independence: per Tim Duy, if Trump can replace Fed governors on the basis of accusations alone, expect appointees “willing to sharply lower rates” (e.g., former Fed Governor Stephen Miran); public pressure on Cook could backfire and push her toward the hawks, or hand the administration a scapegoat if policy tightens before the midterms [2]. Soochow flags renewed Trump interference as intensifying Fed-independence risk and re-inflating the dollar-credit risk premium behind gold [34].
  • Second-order — AI concentration: Jason Furman warns the AI-euphoria-driven investment boom is masking weakness in almost all other investment categories — except data centers — and that if AI investment momentum fades, “a pillar supporting the whole economy could shake”; a bubble burst would more likely be a mild 2001-style recession than a 2007-08 [5].
  • Second-order — oil and policy dependence: HSBC’s Fed/BOE-hold forecast is highly dependent on oil staying controlled; Iran’s tough Hormuz demands, the July 24 Section 301 tariffs (10–12.5% on 60 trading partners), EU-tech-fine tariff threats, and rising El Niño odds on food prices are the named inflation re-acceleration channels [50].
  • Second-order — yield-cap politics: traders read Treasury Secretary Bessent as signaling he will do “whatever he can” to prevent bond yields from soaring; the contested question is whether that could include demanding the Fed hike [51][52].
  • Source quality control: the Bessent yield-cap line is single-source/social via Bloomberg [51][52]; several Hammack flashes are single-source social [17][14][15][18]; Hassett’s remark is a social relay plus Jin10 paraphrase [22][23]; the July wage-growth reading conflicts across sources (+0.05% vs +0.1% m/m) [31][26]; gold levels differ by venue/fix (COMEX $4,346 vs $4,336) and September odds are a cluster (45%, 51.2%, ~50/50) — treat as bands; EPFR flow coverage is acknowledged as incomplete [53].

Appendix: Additional Sources

  • [37] Jin10 Data — oil rebound refocuses inflation/rates risk; AI structural divergence
  • [44] Morning FX (早安汇市) — 2024-vs-2026 dollar setup; CPI as watershed
  • [36] Goldman Sachs — wage tracker; global FCI loosening; current-activity indicators
  • [32] Dongfang Jincheng (东方金诚) — weekly global market recap
  • [34] Soochow Securities (东吴证券) — gold model; Fed-independence risk
  • [42] HuaChuang Securities (华创证券) — weekly data dashboard; commodities
  • [33] HuaChuang Securities (华创证券) — weekly overseas macro data
  • [53] HuaChuang Securities (华创证券) — EPFR global fund flows

This report is a macro-mechanism analysis, not investment advice.

30-day review of this series 7/30 – 8/29
  • Warsh’s credibility shock became the regime’s axis. The July FOMC’s 9-3 hold and ambiguous presser triggered an EM-style credibility shock that pushed the 30-year to 2007 highs; over the following month the Chair’s no-forward-guidance experiment made every data release a “mini-FOMC,” with the Jackson Hole keynote emerging as the arbiter of whether the reaction-function premium would persist.
  • The rate path whipsawed from hike to hold and back. September hike odds collapsed from roughly two-thirds in early August, when soft payrolls and CPI/PPI flipped the debate toward labor-market tolerance, through a 27-32% trough, before a hot July PCE and hawkish FOMC minutes re-lifted pricing into a contested ~36-44% band entering Jackson Hole.
  • The long end developed its own term-premium wall. Yields rose even as front-end easing pricing deepened — the 30Y broke above 5.3%, then Bessent’s surprise doubling of buybacks bought barely two days of relief before the “Bessent put” fully unwound, confirming the move was fiscal and credibility risk, not policy-path dynamics.
  • Gold decoupled from rates into a debasement trade. Its driver shifted from real-yield opportunity cost to fiscal-credit risk, with the metal rallying through high long-end real rates to $4,700; the same dollar-credibility concern that blocked long nominal bonds became gold’s structural fuel.
  • The Treasury-Fed boundary battle blurred debt management with monetary policy. BofA’s “quasi-QE” framing, TGA-funded buybacks, and Fed RMP plans turned the long end into a political asset, with the dollar serving as the shock absorber and policy credibility itself the contested variable.

Sources53

  1. 格隆汇8月11日｜美联储哈玛克：目前的利率并未对经济造成实质性限制。现在是我们采取行动的时候了。 格隆汇快讯 Score 62
  2. Trump reopens Fed battle at critical time for bond markets Reuters Score 62
  3. Global Bond Yields Climb Due to Inflation Fears WSJ Score 61
  4. Treasury yields up as oil prices jump and investors await inflation data CNBC Score 62
  5. 压力给到美国最新通胀数据：是否足以降低市场对9月加息预期？ 第一财经-资讯 Score 65
  6. 美联储9月加息25个基点的概率为51.2% 格隆汇快讯 Score 65
  7. 全球外汇策略：CPI数据前美元呈鹰派不对称但基准情景偏鸽派 外资研报 Score 64
  8. 全球市场观点：宏观基调未变，市场定价分化 外资研报 Score 61
  9. 每周全球视野：争取时间 外资研报 Score 61
  10. 转向鸽派？：淡化美国例外论叙事，关注通胀数据带来的政策拐点 外资研报 Score 66
  11. 新美联储通讯社：沃什“嘴硬”也敌不过数据，两份通胀报告或决定9月加息命运 华尔街见闻 Score 62
  12. Fed's Hammack Says 'Some Number' of Rate Hikes May Be Needed Bloomberg Score 63
  13. 美联储今年票委Hammack：一次加息力度不足，可能需要多次加息 华尔街见闻 Score 62
  14. Fed's Hammack: Now is the time for us to start acting. Twitter·财经快讯 Score 60
  15. Fed's Hammack: Current rate not meaningfully restricting the economy. Twitter·财经快讯 Score 65
  16. 美联储哈玛克：可能需要多次加息压低通胀 格隆汇快讯 Score 62
  17. WATCH LIVE: Fed's Hammack Speaks https://youtu.be/KQp-e_XQnDE?si=kfrbQU5hmBcokC6Z Twitter·财经快讯 Score 67
  18. Fed's Hammack: Would probably need some number of rate hikes. Twitter·财经快讯 Score 68
  19. Inflation Figures, Earnings: What to Watch the Rest of the Week WSJ Score 65
  20. “新美联储通讯社”警示：9月加息与否 通胀数据说了算 格隆汇快讯 Score 63
  21. Warsh Has Deeper Problems Than a Rocky Start at the Fed Bloomberg Score 61
  22. As I write, 30-year yields are 5.28%, a new 19-year high … “Bond Traders can stop panicking when the Fed starts panicking.” The bond market is sign... Twitter·宏观市场 Score 66
  23. 面对美联储理事罢免风波引发的接任猜想，哈塞特紧急澄清，但转头表示，若自己在美联储，9月必将选择按兵不动或降息…… 金十-快讯 Score 61
  24. 全球央行监测：货币政策转向紧缩倾向，预计12家主要央行将加息 外资研报 Score 66
  25. 全球市场日报：美联储沟通与外汇波动性 外资研报 Score 71
  26. 美银美林美国固定收益策略周报：美联储沟通困境与AI资本支出展望 外资研报 Score 62
  27. 美国利率观察：通胀数据将考验空头头寸，收益率曲线倾向变陡 外资研报 Score 67
  28. 花旗：通胀降温与就业疲软反驳过热论，关键CPI数据将决定美联储加息路径 外资研报 Score 62
  29. 周期性思维：全球经济的韧性、粘性通胀与加息预期 外资研报 Score 63
  30. 每日经济简报：全球资本支出持续强劲，美国就业数据引发谨慎情绪 外资研报 Score 62
  31. 7月美国CPI预计降温：美联储加息预期或迎二次冲击 华尔街见闻 Score 60
  32. [东方金诚]海外宏观周报：美国就业数据走弱带动加息预期降温，全球债市收益率普遍下行 内资宏观研究 Score 61
  33. 美国经济活动指数回升、PMI保持偏强——海外周报第152期 一瑜中的 Score 66
  34. 【芦哲&张佳炜】如期进入右侧的金价能涨多久、涨多高？——海外周报20260810 宏观fans哲 Score 62
  35. What Options Traders Expect After Wednesday's Inflation Report WSJ Score 66
  36. 全球：高盛经济指标更新：美国工资增长放缓至3.6% 外资研报 Score 62
  37. 油价反弹令通胀与收益率风险重回市场核心，美元、黄金与日元共同牵动利率定价；AI交易则转向融资约束、定价权与盈利能力的结构性分化。 金十-快讯 Score 60
  38. 周三，美国将公布7月CPI数据，摩根大通预警美股面临显著波动。在美联储主席沃什力推2%通胀目标之际，市场正重新评估加息预期与美国沉重债务负担。点击查看… 金十-快讯 Score 63
  39. Europe Is Ticking a Lot of Boxes for Investors Right Now Bloomberg Score 60
  40. Treasury Yields Rise as Wall Street Expects Stable Inflation Data WSJ Score 65
  41. Gold Touches $4,400 as Traders Turn Focus to US Inflation Data Bloomberg Score 60
  42. 出行热度延续——每周经济观察第82期 一瑜中的 Score 60
  43. 贵金属的机会不只在避险，而在实际利率、仓位和资金回流共振。点击查看... 金十-快讯 Score 60
  44. 美元拐点将至？2024年vs2026年 华尔街见闻 Score 61
  45. 美债收益率上行的根源：实际利率刚性走强；提早加息或为破局之道 张忆东策略世界 Score 65
  46. 澳洲联储利率决定符合预期 通胀风险偏向上行但并未表现出过度担忧 格隆汇快讯 Score 62
  47. 格隆汇8月11日｜澳洲联储：鉴于货币政策被认为略显紧缩，委员会决定维持现金利率目标不变，以评估经济的发展情况。委员会将继续采取必要措施，确保通胀可持续回... 格隆汇快讯 Score 61
  48. 澳大利亚四大银行目前普遍预测，加息周期已经见顶，澳洲联储将在一段较长时间内维持现状，随后转向宽松。全球主要央行的关注点正从“加息多高”转向“维持多久”... 金十-快讯 Score 62
  49. 晨间市场摘要：日元唤醒时刻与美国GDP追踪 外资研报 Score 62
  50. 波涛汹涌：油价波动下的关键宏观图表 外资研报 Score 61
  51. Will this include demanding the Fed hike rates? “Bond traders can stop panicking when the Fed starts panicking.” The market is worried about inflati... Twitter·宏观市场 Score 69
  52. Interest rates are an input in the US economic system. The government shapes the curve by its control over overnight rates, Fed balance sheet, issuanc... Twitter·宏观市场 Score 73
  53. 全球风险偏好边际收敛，中国股票主动资金维持流入——全球资金流动周报第21期 一瑜中的 Score 65