sembr.live
中

Fed Watch

Post-FOMC Fallout: 30-Year at 19-Year High Then Eases Friday; June Core PCE Cools Below Consensus; BOJ/BOE Hold, PBoC Signals Q3 Easing; Warsh Credibility Becomes the Market's Core Variable

The Warsh Fed's "hawkish hold" aftermath dominates: the 30-year yield touched a 19-year high of 5.24% before reversing lower Friday, June core PCE cooled below expectations while staying sticky, and the BOJ and BOE both held as the PBoC signaled faster easing — leaving September hike odds near 60-67% and Fed credibility as the swing variable for risk assets.

60 sources ~40 min

0. Weekly Arc

The week was defined by the most binary FOMC in years: a 9-3 hold with three hawkish dissents, and a deliberately opaque Warsh press conference that backfired as markets doubted his inflation resolve. Long-end yields spiked to 19-year highs while short yields fell, producing one of the largest FOMC-day curve twists in decades. Cooling June PCE and a resilient domestic-demand GDP print supported the hold camp, while the BOE and BOJ both held and Beijing signaled fresh easing. The arc closes with credibility — not the rate level — as the dominant macro variable.

1. Policy Narrative & Expectations

Over the past 24 hours the narrative has moved from the decision itself to its aftermath: September hike odds have settled near 60-67%, down from near-full pricing before the meeting [1][2][3][4][5], while long-end yields stay elevated on inflation-credibility and term-premium concerns [6][7][8]. The cooling June PCE print gave the hold camp a data tail [2][9], but Warsh’s hints about broadening the inflation gauge and possible January framework changes have become the focus of a deepening credibility debate [10][11][12][13].

1.1 FOMC Officials’ Remarks

  • [ONGOING] Hawkish — Lorie Logan (Dallas Fed), Beth Hammack (Cleveland Fed), Neel Kashkari (Minneapolis Fed): All three dissented in favor of a 25bp hike — the first three same-direction dissents since September 2016 [14][15]; Logan had publicly argued for a “moderate rate hike” two weeks before the meeting to better balance the dual mandate [16][17].
  • [NEW] Neutral — Christopher Waller (Fed Governor): In a primary-source speech on policy transmission, Waller argued “initial conditions are crucial” and, with direct relevance to the Warsh no-guidance experiment, that forward guidance “can change economic conditions more quickly than adjusting the policy rate alone” — but that the FOMC’s September 2020 guidance “tied the hands of the FOMC in 2021 and unnecessarily delayed rate increases,” and that guidance is less useful when policymakers face divergent scenarios [18].
  • [ESCALATED] Chair Kevin Warsh: New coverage hardened the “credibility shock” reading of his Wednesday press conference. He avowed “no soft inflation target… There is only a target, and it is 2 percent” [15], yet simultaneously downplayed the Fed’s inflation-fighting tools, voiced reservations about committing to the 2% PCE target, and endorsed the market having done “quite a bit” of tightening in the 42 days since the June meeting [8][11][19][12]. Per Goldman’s David Mericle (via FT), Warsh made four dovish comments — downplaying AI-related price pressures, tying higher rates to a strong economy, hinting market-rate rises could substitute for a hike, and suggesting more credible target-commitment could lower inflation expectations [19]. BofA’s Aditya Bhave says “Markets are likely taking issue with Warsh’s suggestion that markets have already tightened monetary policy on their own” [20]; JPMorgan’s Michael Feroli says he “failed to specify how he intended to achieve his stridently asserted inflation resolve” [11]; and Ed Yardeni writes he “looked like he failed his first credibility test” [20]. Marginal shift: from market surprise to open institutional doubt about whether the Fed will actually deliver the September hike markets price [21][20][22].

1.2 Policy Signals & Institutional Communication

  • [ONGOING] September pricing consolidates near 60-67% — CME FedWatch at 63.4% [3], swaps at about two-thirds [4], Nomura at 67% for the Sept 15 meeting [5], BofA at 65.2% vs 81% pre-statement [2] — down from near-full pre-meeting pricing, with the odds of a second 2026 hike roughly halved to about 40% [4].
  • [ONGOING] Institutional dispersion persists at cycle extremes: Goldman Sachs and Barclays expect the Fed on hold through year-end [23][2], BofA expects three hikes starting in September [2], Citi maintains an easing path [2][24], and JPMorgan pulled its expected hike forward to December [7][25][2][26].
  • [NEW] Framework signals: Warsh hinted the January 2027 policy strategy statement could add to or adjust the inflation-measure language while keeping the 2% number [12][13][27]; his Jackson Hole speech (Aug 27-29) remains “a blank piece of paper” [15][27]; and he publicly surfaced a balance-sheet question — how much accommodation the Fed is still getting from the balance sheet — which GF Securities flags as a potential marginal-tightening channel [15].
  • [NEW] Positioning: a record short in August fed funds futures, built to hedge a possible hike, is unwinding after the hold [28]; Goldman warns momentum-strategy drawdowns have exceeded 2.5 standard deviations of their 20-day mean, with deleveraging speed rivaling the COVID era [6].
  • [NEW] Committee composition: J.P. Morgan Asset Management notes the more hawkish FOMC members are concentrated among the four rotating regional presidents rather than long-serving governors, suggesting limited durability of a hawkish shift [29].

2. Key Data & Market Read

  • [NEW] June core PCE — below expectations: core PCE rose 0.1% m/m, below the 0.2% consensus, with the y/y rate easing to 3.3% from 3.4% [2][4][9]. El-Erian (single source): “core inflation pressures remain under control for now” [30]. Market read: a dovish tail for the hold camp, but sticky and far above target — the sixth consecutive year significantly above 2% [9]. Narrative impact: supports Warsh’s “watchful thinking” posture but does not resolve the credibility debate [2][9].
  • [NEW] June headline PCE — first monthly decline since 2020: headline PCE fell 0.1% m/m, in line with expectations, slowing the y/y rate to 3.7% from 4.1% [31][2][4][32][9]. The decline was energy-led, tied to the temporary US-Iran ceasefire [2][9]. Narrative impact: the one-off external driver keeps markets cautious on durability [9].
  • [NEW] Q2 GDP — below expectations but internally strong: GDP rose at a 1.5% annualized rate, below expectations, but private domestic final sales grew 3.9%, the fastest since early 2023, with industrial equipment spending up 29% annualized [31][25][33]. Per JPMorgan, the headline slowdown “masks strong underlying domestic demand,” with inventories and net trade dragging 1.7pp [25]. Narrative impact: supports the “growth resilient” read that keeps the Fed focused on inflation [33].
  • [NEW] June income/spending — saving rate at four-year low: consumer spending rose 0.3% m/m, in line; personal income rose 0.2%, below expectations; the saving rate fell to 2.7%, a four-year low [2]. Narrative impact: consumption resilience is increasingly funded by savings drawdown — a growth-vulnerability signal [2].
  • [ONGOING] June CPI slowed to 3.5% y/y with the largest m/m drop since April 2020 [16]; Warsh said the print had little impact on the July decision — “what matters is the trend,” per Soochow Securities [13].

3. Financial-Conditions Signals

  • [ESCALATED] Long-end rates: the 30-year yield hit 5.24% intraday Thursday — its highest since 2007 — before paring gains [7][20][34]; JPMorgan flags the close above the 2023-26 5.15%-5.20% range with next targets at 5.30% and 5.50% [8]. The 30s2s spread widened to 0.97pp, the largest one-day move in nearly a year [7].
  • [EASED] Friday reversal: yields moved lower — 30-year at 5.188%, 10-year at 4.647%, 2-year near 4.231% — reversing part of the post-FOMC surge [35].
  • [NEW] Real yields: the 30-year real yield reached 2.98%, the highest since 2008 [22][36]; Bloomberg’s Lisa Abramowicz notes the rise “isn’t just being driven by inflation expectations” [36].
  • [NEW] Inflation compensation: the 30-year breakeven jumped 6bp Wednesday, the largest one-day rise since the day after the November 2024 election [4]; GMF Research notes the entire 10-year move (+6bp) came from breakevens, not real rates [27]; Nomura puts the 10-year breakeven at 2.26% with the real yield flat at 2.41% [37].
  • [NEW] Transmission math: Goldman estimates the 33bp GS FCI tightening over the 42-day intermeeting period is roughly equivalent to 50bp of actual Fed hikes [19]; Barclays concludes the tightening needed to return inflation to 2% “is more likely to come through higher long-end rates than through Fed overnight rate hikes” [7].
  • [NEW] Dollar: DXY slipped to around 100.8 after the statement [38][15]; Nomura sees fading near-term dollar support and maintains a medium-term bearish USD view [5]; JPMorgan expects the trade-weighted dollar to appreciate 1.2%-2.5% over the next year, with upside if a hiking cycle begins [26].
  • [NEW] Credit & banking: NY Fed household-debt data show consumer-credit serious delinquency at 9.40% ex-mortgage, credit-card serious delinquency at 13.12% (near the 2010 record), and auto-loan serious delinquency at a record 5.6% [39]; Soochow Securities argues the headline metric overstates severity via statistical scope, but confirms K-shaped stress concentrated in subprime and low-income borrowers [39][40].
  • [NEW] Gold: rallied with the weaker dollar, briefly above $4,100 after the statement [38]; HSBC sees solid short-term support at $4,000 with $4,100 potentially becoming the new support level [31].

4. Global Central-Bank Linkages

  • [NEW] BOJ: kept policy unchanged, slightly upgraded the growth outlook and cut near-term inflation forecasts; analysts read the decision as hawkish and October hike odds have risen [41]. The statement says the Bank “will keep raising interest rates in response to economic, price trends and financial conditions” [42] and will consider “the timing and pace of rate increases” while watching Middle East developments [43][44]. Tokyo inflation quickened, keeping the BOJ on its hiking path [45]; Nomura reads the recent FX intervention as a preemptive strike on speculative yen shorts, not a policy shift, and expects a neutral-to-dovish BOJ read versus consensus [37].
  • [NEW] BOE: held Bank Rate at 3.75% on a 6-3 vote (Mann, Pill and Greene dissenting for a hike); Governor Bailey said the decision should not be read as a step toward hiking and that the Bank is “not close to hiking” [46][47][48][49], adding that the upward-sloping market curve “reflects risk premia rather than central expectations” [50][51]. Citi expects continued fading of BoE hike pricing and gilt bull-steepening [52]; Goldman and BofA expect an extended hold, with a September QT slowdown to about £50bn/year [47][53][52].
  • [NEW] PBoC: the July 30 Politburo meeting reaffirmed a “moderately loose” monetary policy and called for comprehensively using and timely adjusting monetary-policy tools [54][55][56]; economists expect Q3 RRR cuts (25-50bp of room) and a 10-20bp policy-rate cut if the recovery weakens [55][56]; CICC expects PBoC easing to accelerate in H2 2026 [54].
  • [NEW] ECB: HSBC now expects a 25bp September hike on the oil/gas rebound, then a hold into 2027 [57]; Goldman expects a second September hike with a low threshold for a third [23].
  • [NEW] Others: the Bank of Korea hiked 25bp to 2.75% with consecutive hikes possible [57]; the SARB unexpectedly held at 7.00% on a 4-2 vote [57]; Bloomberg reports rising US yields may complicate the RBI’s rate and rupee strategy [58].

5. Asset Implications

This section is inference — no [N]. Anchored to the facts above.

QuadrantCurrent probability tiltKey asset implicationAnchoring narrative
Growth↑ + Inflation↑FallingLong-end yields near 19-year highs cap the reflation trade; TIPS benefit from 30-year real yields at 2008 highs; commodities supported by oil re-escalation with the US resuming strikes on Iran; nominal long bonds vulnerable to further bear-steepening§1.1; §3
Growth↑ + Inflation↓RisingThe Goldilocks window reopened on cooling core PCE plus resilient domestic demand (PDFS +3.9%): front-end duration bid, value over growth, IG credit relatively defensive; Citi and CMB International argue markets overprice the hike path§1.2; §2
Growth↓ + Inflation↑RisingThe stagflation tail stays live: oil re-escalation, credibility doubts, and a “loss-of-confidence” steepening drive stocks and long bonds down together; gold bid on a weak dollar; the no-guidance regime converts policy uncertainty into a term-premium tax on risk assets§1.1; §3
Growth↓ + Inflation↓FallingA recession-plus-disinflation bond rally is blocked at the long end by fiscal and term-premium supply (JPMorgan’s bear-market warning with 5.30-5.50 targets); the front end would rally first; long-duration nominal bonds remain the wrong vehicle until credibility is restored§3

Stock-bond correlation call: The regime is still inflation-driven positive correlation. The 30-year’s 6bp one-day breakeven jump and the “loss-of-confidence” steepening indicate the long end is repricing inflation compensation and term premium — the most equity-unfriendly format of a bear market. Friday’s reversal lower opened a partial negative-correlation window, but it is data-driven (soft core PCE), not credibility-driven, and therefore fragile. So long as markets doubt Warsh’s reaction function — with September odds near 60-67% yet a credible case for another hold — stocks and long bonds will tend to fall together, which is the hardest regime for risk parity. A decisive flip to negative correlation requires the Fed to restore disinflation credibility, most plausibly at Jackson Hole.

Risk-budget implication: Overweight front-end (2-year) duration — the dovish hold and cooling core PCE make the elevated September hike premium vulnerable to another no-move surprise; Citi and CMB International provide the institutional tail. Overweight curve steepeners (2s30s, 5s30s) — both JPMorgan’s “further bearish steepening” call and the credibility-loss dynamic favor this. Underweight long-end nominal duration — JPMorgan’s 5.30-5.50 targets and the fiscal/term-premium story argue against long nominal bonds; TIPS are the better long-duration expression given real yields at 2008 highs. Overweight gold tactically — $4,000 support, a weak dollar, and official-sector buying (Q2 official demand exceeded jewelry demand) argue for holding the metal as the credibility hedge. Underweight high-duration equity beta — the Nasdaq’s prolonged correction, Goldman’s momentum-deleveraging warning, and the value-over-growth rotation all argue for trimming long-duration tech; Goldman’s long-dated call recommendation is the low-drawdown way to keep exposure.

6. Contrarian & Tail Risks

  • Consensus fragility — the September hike is a coin flip with a two-sided violent outcome: at 60-67% pricing, a September hike is hardly certain. Analysts warn the Fed could again surprise by holding — which would push the Treasury curve still higher and trigger market turmoil; conversely, a hike validates the credibility-shock narrative and hits duration and equities together. Warsh’s refusal to provide forward guidance means near-term hike expectations cannot be falsified until the September meeting.
  • Consensus fragility — the “Odyssean guidance” experiment: BNP Paribas (via Business Insider) argues Warsh is “experimenting with ‘Odyssean’ loose forward guidance: loosely promising rate hikes later in exchange for disinflationary effects today.” The falsifiable risk, per former BoE adviser Tony Yates (via FT), is that markets eventually stop responding to hints without follow-through — leaving the Fed with only actual hikes or a full credibility collapse.
  • Falsifiable assumptions: (1) core PCE stays contained around 3.3% into Q4 — challenged by oil re-escalation as the US resumes strikes on Iran; (2) five-year breakevens stay anchored — sustained breakeven rises are flagged as the moment to question Fed credibility; (3) the BEA’s recalculation of inflation measurement holds — criticized by some as lowering reported inflation on paper. If any breaks, September pricing snaps hawkish.
  • Second-order — fiscal dominance and term premium: Goldman notes developed-market deficits have never normalized since COVID, implying persistently higher term premia and stickier inflation; JPMorgan documents Gulf states’ net selling of US portfolio securities this year and a five-year rise in term premium. A sustained 30-year bear market — toward 5.30-5.50 — would tighten financial conditions by the equivalent of roughly 50bp of hikes within a year, hitting growth through fiscal and mortgage channels.
  • Second-order — consumer credit and food two-step: elevated odds of a “super” El Niño by end-2026 could add materially to global food inflation, compounding the headline impact if oil keeps climbing; roughly 7.5 million SAVE-plan borrowers enter a repayment transition in Q4 2026, an incremental consumer-credit risk on top of record serious delinquencies concentrated in subprime borrowers.
  • Source quality control: El-Erian’s PCE read, Hassett’s “very bullish on Fed policy” comment, and the Lustig/Hillenbrand yield-response posts are single-source/unverified or social; the BNP “Odyssean guidance” characterization is attributed research via Business Insider; the GMF Research and Zheshang Securities readings of Warsh’s framework shift are single sell-side interpretations, not consensus. Conflicts among institutional forecasts remain at cycle extremes — Citi’s cutting path versus BofA’s three-hike path versus Goldman/Barclays’ hold — so no single house call should anchor a position.

Appendix: Additional Sources

  • [6] Wallstreetcn — Goldman: Warsh’s opaque reaction function backfiring; momentum drawdown at COVID-era speed
  • [37] Nomura — FX intervention as preemptive strike; five Fed-behind-the-curve risks
  • [4] Wallstreetcn — Long-end yields at multi-decade highs; 30Y breakeven +6bp; option bets target 4.80%/5.30%
  • [59] SPDB International — Fed on hold through H2 2026; oil/AI medium-term hike triggers
  • [19] Financial Times — Warsh’s market-driven tightening: the critique; Goldman FCI math
  • [12] Guosheng Securities — “Hawkish pause”; no hike or cut this year
  • [60] Zheshang Securities — Warsh’s broader inflation-indicator shift; Q4 hike-expectation reversal
  • [39] Soochow Securities — NY Fed delinquency metric critique; K-shaped consumer credit
  • [15] GF Securities — Warsh’s reaction function; balance sheet as a tightening channel
  • [27] GMF Research — Largest FOMC-day curve twist in decades; 10Y move entirely from breakevens

This report is a macro-mechanism analysis, not investment advice.

30-day review of this series 7/30 – 8/29
  • Warsh’s credibility shock became the regime’s axis. The July FOMC’s 9-3 hold and ambiguous presser triggered an EM-style credibility shock that pushed the 30-year to 2007 highs; over the following month the Chair’s no-forward-guidance experiment made every data release a “mini-FOMC,” with the Jackson Hole keynote emerging as the arbiter of whether the reaction-function premium would persist.
  • The rate path whipsawed from hike to hold and back. September hike odds collapsed from roughly two-thirds in early August, when soft payrolls and CPI/PPI flipped the debate toward labor-market tolerance, through a 27-32% trough, before a hot July PCE and hawkish FOMC minutes re-lifted pricing into a contested ~36-44% band entering Jackson Hole.
  • The long end developed its own term-premium wall. Yields rose even as front-end easing pricing deepened — the 30Y broke above 5.3%, then Bessent’s surprise doubling of buybacks bought barely two days of relief before the “Bessent put” fully unwound, confirming the move was fiscal and credibility risk, not policy-path dynamics.
  • Gold decoupled from rates into a debasement trade. Its driver shifted from real-yield opportunity cost to fiscal-credit risk, with the metal rallying through high long-end real rates to $4,700; the same dollar-credibility concern that blocked long nominal bonds became gold’s structural fuel.
  • The Treasury-Fed boundary battle blurred debt management with monetary policy. BofA’s “quasi-QE” framing, TGA-funded buybacks, and Fed RMP plans turned the long end into a political asset, with the dollar serving as the shock absorber and policy credibility itself the contested variable.

Sources60

  1. 美联储，9月加息概率骤降 36氪 Score 61
  2. 美国6月PCE时隔四年再次回落，美联储下一步会怎么走 第一财经-资讯 Score 64
  3. 美联储9月加息25个基点的概率为63.4% 格隆汇快讯 Score 65
  4. 美国PCE数据后长端美债压力未解：30年期收益率逼近5.2%，期限利差走阔 华尔街见闻 Score 63
  5. FOMC后策略思考：美元支撑减弱，上调做空美元/离岸人民币信心至4/5 外资研报 Score 64
  6. 高盛：美联储框架不透明或适得其反，长端利率或倒逼再度加息 华尔街见闻 Score 67
  7. 空谈无益！两次发布会后，华尔街开始质疑沃什“信誉” 华尔街见闻 Score 60
  8. 美国国债市场日报：收益率曲线趋陡，30年期美债面临进一步上行风险 外资研报 Score 61
  9. -0.1%！美国6月PCE物价指数六年来首次环比下降，同比涨幅显著收窄 华尔街见闻 Score 60
  10. Warsh Hints at New Inflation Roadmap, Stoking Investor Angst Bloomberg Score 68
  11. Why the bond market is doubting Fed chairman Kevin Warsh Axios Score 61
  12. 美联储不加息，美债为何不买账？ 华尔街见闻 Score 65
  13. 【芦哲&张佳炜】7月FOMC：沃什暗示将丰富通胀目标内容——2026年7月FOMC会议点评 宏观fans哲 Score 67
  14. [浦银国际证券]美联储7月议息会议继续按兵不动，利率前瞻指引尽失 内资宏观研究 Score 67
  15. 【广发宏观陈嘉荔】如何理解美联储7月会议的最新表述 郭磊宏观茶座 Score 68
  16. 美联储年内加息？景顺首席全球市场策略师：即便加也是一次性，明年转向降息 第一财经-资讯 Score 66
  17. What to Watch at the Federal Reserve's July Meeting NYT Score 64
  18. Christopher J Waller: Two thoughts on the transmission of monetary policy BIS Score 64
  19. Trying to make sense of Warsh Financial Times Score 65
  20. The highest Treasury yields in 19 years are sending a big warning to Kevin Warsh Business Insider Score 62
  21. How Warsh Left Investors Baffled at His Second Press Conference Bloomberg Score 60
  22. 美联储9月若维持利率不变，或引发美债收益率大幅飙升 格隆汇快讯 Score 65
  23. 宏观研究焦点：美联储鸽派按兵不动，AI波动持续，美国贸易政策 外资研报 Score 65
  24. 新兴市场策略周报：美联储希望收益率曲线变陡 外资研报 Score 62
  25. 每日经济简报：美国二季度GDP增速放缓至1.5%，全球资本流动保持稳健 外资研报 Score 62
  26. 宏观企业聚焦：中东冲突对央行政策、美元及大宗商品的影响 外资研报 Score 61
  27. 7月FOMC：一场誓师大会（标红标黑版） 坦途宏观 Score 66
  28. Wall Street's Record Fed Funds Short Unravels After Rates Held Bloomberg Score 66
  29. 美联储维持利率不变，内部分歧显现 资管报告 Score 70
  30. Another softer-than-expected US inflation reading. Today’s PCE data, the Fed’s favorite measure, confirms that core inflation pressures remain under... Twitter·宏观市场 Score 65
  31. 贵金属日报：美元走弱与收益率曲线陡峭化助推金价上涨 外资研报 Score 63
  32. 美联储决议后首批数据发布 长期美债收益率守住大部分涨幅 格隆汇快讯 Score 65
  33. 中金：美国经济韧性凸显，增长动能扩散 中金点睛 Score 61
  34. Treasury Yields Climb Further After Fed Signals Reluctance to Raise Rates WSJ Score 64
  35. Treasury yields inch lower as investors await fresh economic data CNBC Score 62
  36. Real yields on 30-year Treasuries are the highest since 2008. The rise in yields isn't just being driven by inflation expectations. Twitter·财经快讯 Score 63
  37. 外汇干预与日本央行会议：协同努力扭转日元疲软？ 外资研报 Score 61
  38. 7月FOMC例会，一次沟通“事故” 华尔街见闻 Score 67
  39. 【芦哲&张佳炜】如何看待美国消费信贷逾期率近新高？ 宏观fans哲 Score 64
  40. 美联储7月按兵不动通胀预期升温，美消费信贷风险上行，国内定调加大逆周期调节力度---0730宏观脱水 华尔街见闻 Score 66
  41. 日本央行小幅上调经济增长预期，同时下调短期通胀预测，但这些调整难以改变市场对后续加息路径的预期。分析师解读这次决议偏鹰，10月加息的概率有所上升。点击查... 金十-快讯 Score 62
  42. BOJ: will keep raising interest rates in response to economic, price trends and financial conditions Twitter·财经快讯 Score 62
  43. BOJ: will consider timing, pace of rate increases while assessing chances of baseline scenario and risks, focusing on Middle East impact, expansion in... Twitter·财经快讯 Score 61
  44. BOJ: will consider timing and pace of rate hikes while assessing chances of baseline scenario and risks, watching impact of Middle East developments Twitter·财经快讯 Score 64
  45. 🇯🇵 #Tokyo Inflation Quickens, Keeping BOJ on Interest Rate Hike Path - Bloomberg https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-07-30/tokyo-inflat... Twitter·宏观市场 Score 62
  46. 英国央行7月议息会议回顾：维持利率不变，关注全球压力与本地宽松 外资研报 Score 60
  47. 英国央行7月会议点评：维持利率不变，不急于行动 外资研报 Score 61
  48. 英国央行决议要点汇总 格隆汇快讯 Score 62
  49. BOE on Alert for Signs of Persistent Inflation as It Holds Rates WSJ Score 61
  50. 英国央行行长：更多证据表明通胀正在回落 英国市场曲线与我们对经济的解读完全一致 格隆汇快讯 Score 60
  51. BoE Gov. Bailey: Current market pricing reflects risk premia rather than central expectations for the bank rate. Twitter·财经快讯 Score 64
  52. 欧洲利率周报：坚守阵地 外资研报 Score 60
  53. 欧洲日报：英国央行7月会议回顾——加息门槛高企 外资研报 Score 60
  54. 中金：联合解读政治局会议 中金点睛 Score 62
  55. “综合运用并适时调整货币政策工具”释放了什么信号 华尔街见闻 Score 62
  56. 政治局会议深读｜“综合运用并适时调整货币政策工具”释放了什么信号 澎湃新闻 Score 63
  57. 全球政策利率：汇丰更新主要央行利率预测 外资研报 Score 65
  58. Rising US Yields May Complicate RBI's Rate and Rupee Strategy Bloomberg Score 62
  59. [浦银国际证券]月度美国宏观洞察：美伊冲突再起、美联储不再提供利率指引将如何影响美国经济？ 内资宏观研究 Score 61
  60. 【浙商李超林成炜宏观团队】核心信号：关注更广泛的通胀指标 李超宏观研究与资产配置 Score 65