Warsh Strikes Dovish Tone on Inflation, ADP Miss Triggers Gold Bounce and Front-End Repricing; All Eyes on June NFP Binary
Fed Chair Warsh struck a dovish tone on inflation at the ECB Sintra forum — acknowledging that inflation risks and expectations have declined over recent weeks — even as he reiterated no early easing roadmap and refused to signal the July meeting; the ADP employment miss (98k vs 118k consensus) triggered a front-end repricing, with July hike probability falling to ~28% and gold bouncing back above $4,000; the June nonfarm payrolls report is the next binary clearing event, with BofA scenario analysis showing asymmetric tail risks — a weak print could trigger sharp CTA short-covering in front-end rates.
0. Weekly Arc
The week opened with the June 17 FOMC hawkish repricing fully consolidated — the 9-9 dot-plot tie for hikes, Warsh’s communication reform, and the gold crash below $3,950. Hammack’s concentrated hawkish salvo on Monday reinforced the front-end tightening narrative. By Wednesday, Warsh’s Sintra speech delivered a notably less hawkish tone than market pricing implied — he acknowledged that inflation expectations have come down and inflation risks have receded — triggering a tactical unwind of front-end hike premium. The ADP miss on Thursday confirmed the softening labor market signal, pushing July hike probability to ~28% and gold back above $4,000. The arc is: hawkish consolidation → Warsh dovish nuance → ADP-driven repricing → all eyes on Friday’s NFP.
1. Policy Narrative & Expectations
The net change over the past ~24h is a modest dovish tilt driven by Warsh’s Sintra tone and the ADP miss. Warsh acknowledged that inflation expectations have fallen over the past four weeks and that inflation risks have receded [1][2][3], while reiterating that the Fed is committed to bringing inflation to 2% and that those expecting the Fed to tolerate above-target inflation “will be disappointed” [1][2]. He refused to provide forward guidance or signal the July meeting [1][4][5][6][7], and said he hopes for a “benign family debate” at the July FOMC [1][8]. Market pricing reacted by reducing July hike probability from ~34% to ~28% [9], while the September hike probability held at ~50% for a single 25bp move [9]. The ADP data (98k vs 118k consensus) reinforced the labor market softening narrative [10][11].
1.1 FOMC Officials’ Remarks
-
[NEW] Dovish-leaning — Kevin Warsh (Chair, Sintra speech): Warsh gave a comprehensive, nuanced speech at the ECB’s Sintra forum that was broadly read as more dovish than market expectations. Key points: (1) “Inflation expectations have come down over the first four weeks” of his tenure and “inflation risks have come down” [2][12][3]; (2) he reaffirmed the Fed’s commitment to 2% inflation and warned that “if households, businesses, or financial markets think the Fed is comfortable with inflation persistently above 2%… they will be disappointed” [1][2]; (3) he refused to signal the July meeting, saying he “won’t make a judgment now” and hopes for a “benign family debate” among colleagues [1][4][5][8][6]; (4) he said forward guidance is “not the right policy for the current moment” [13][7]; (5) he expressed a preference for interest rate policy as the key tool and noted the balance sheet works mostly through asset prices [14][15]; (6) he said he will consult “the best minds from inside and outside the US” via the five task forces, with task force leaders likely announced next week [16][17]; (7) on AI, he said it causes “capex surge and demand rise” but there is “not enough info to judge whether it is inflationary” [18]. Marginal shift vs prior history: Warsh’s Sintra speech represents the first time he has explicitly stated that inflation risks and expectations have declined — a more dovish characterization than his June 17 press conference. The market read the speech as a “cautious, independent Fed narrative” [19] that “dampens hopes for rapid rate cuts” [19] but is also “not really bullish” because “the Fed is not here to protect valuation multiples” [19].
-
[NEW] Neutral — Lorie Logan (Dallas Fed President): Logan warned that the Dallas Fed’s trimmed-mean methodology “may be discarding the wrong prices,” raising doubts about the reliability of the measure that Warsh has cited as his preferred inflation gauge [20].
-
[ESCALATED] Other Fed officials filling the void: Politico notes that “nearly a third of Fed officials have commented on the policy path in the past week” [21], with multiple officials feeding investor expectations that the Fed will hike rates this year [21]. BofA notes that in the two weeks since the June FOMC, there have been only 12 Fed official public appearances, far below the post-FOMC average of 23 since 2022, potentially reflecting Warsh’s “say less” policy [22].
1.2 Policy Signals & Institutional Communication
-
[NEW] Warsh task force leaders expected next week: Warsh stated in Sintra that the Fed will “likely have news next week on leaders of task forces” [17], covering communication, balance sheet, data use, productivity and employment, and inflation framework [8]. He added he hopes to achieve “real-time data-based policymaking within one year” [18].
-
[NEW] Warsh confirms dot plot to stay for now: Warsh said the dot plot will be maintained “at least for the short time” [23], pushing back against expectations that it might be abolished immediately.
-
[ONGOING] FOMC split — 9 for hikes, 8 for hold, 1 for cut: The June SEP showed 9 of 18 officials rate-hike-eligible [1]; the FOMC is “split down the middle” on the next move [24]; BNP Paribas expects rate hikes starting in December [25]; Morgan Stanley expects no move this year [26][27][28]; Amundi expects no move but notes hike risk is rising [29].
-
[ESCALATED] Market pricing: CME FedWatch as of 07/01: July hold 71.7%, 25bp hike 28.3%; September hold 36.1%, 25bp hike 49.8%, 50bp hike 14.1% [30]. Nomura notes July probability at 27%, September at 79% [31]. Market pricing implies about 80% probability of a 25bp rate hike by September, fully priced by October [11].
-
[NEW] Deutsche Bank: tokenization could reduce reserve demand by $250bn: DB estimates that broad intraday repo adoption could reduce bank reserve demand by about $250bn, supporting the new Fed Chair’s ability to shrink the balance sheet [32].
-
[NEW] BofA: Fed communication vacuum: BofA notes only 12 Fed official appearances in the two weeks post-FOMC vs the 2022+ average of 23, likely reflecting Warsh’s “say less” policy [22].
-
[NEW] Barclays: US equity record inflows in June: June saw a record ~$150bn inflow into US equities, with long-only fund inflows reaching a record ~$180bn [33].
2. Key Data & Market Read
-
[NEW] ADP employment (June): 98k, below consensus of 118k and prior of 122k — the lowest since March [10][11]. Market read: The data was seen as confirming labor market softening, triggering a front-end repricing lower and a gold bounce [10][11]. The data “weakened market concerns about a September rate hike” [10]. Narrative impact: Confirms the softening labor market narrative and challenges the hawkish case for rate hikes.
-
[NEW] Initial jobless claims: 227k in the BLS survey week, up from 210k in the May survey; continuing claims rose to 1.821 million [11]. Market read: Consistent with slowing job creation. Narrative impact: Supports the cooling labor market narrative.
-
[NEW] S&P Global manufacturing PMI employment sub-index (June): Fell for the second consecutive month, with factory job cuts at the fastest since the 2020 pandemic (2009 ex-pandemic) [11]. Market read: Highlights manufacturing weakness. Narrative impact: Adds to the softening labor market signal.
-
[NEW] CBRE consumer confidence survey (June): Share of respondents saying “jobs are hard to find” rose to 22.5%, the highest since January 2021; labor market differential fell 2.6pp to +2.4 [11]. Market read: Consumer confidence in the labor market is weakening. Narrative impact: Supports the view that labor market cooling is becoming more broad-based.
-
[NEW] BofA Q2 GDP tracking estimate: Lowered to 2.1% annualized, driven by net export drag [22]. Narrative impact: Growth momentum is decelerating, which may reduce the urgency for rate hikes.
-
[NEW] BofA ISM estimate: BofA estimates June ISM manufacturing at 53.5, below consensus 53.8 and prior 54.0 [22]. Narrative impact: Manufacturing expansion slowing.
-
[ONGOING] CNBC inflation indicator roundup: Outlines the divergence between measures: Core CPI 2.9%, Core PCE 3.4%, Dallas Fed trimmed-mean 2.4%, Atlanta Fed sticky CPI 3.1%, flexible CPI 7%, Truflation 1.75% [20]. Narrative impact: The wide dispersion of inflation measures creates ambiguity about which gauge the Fed will anchor policy to.
-
[NEW] June nonfarm payrolls (due tomorrow): Consensus is 115k, down from 172k in May [34]. BofA expects 110k with unemployment at 4.3% [35]. BNP Paribas expects “another above-trend reading” [25]. UBS had previously forecast 80k. Narrative impact: This is the single most important data point this week — a miss would collapse the hawkish repricing, while a beat would reinforce it. The World Cup effect may artificially inflate the headline, masking true cooling [36][11].
3. Financial-Conditions Signals
-
[NEW] Dollar & rates — yields relatively stable: US 10-year yield rose 1bp to 4.49% on the day, with traders awaiting NFP [37]. 2-year forward OIS rates (terminal rate proxy) rose to 3.76% [31]. 10-year real yields at 2.25%, breakevens at 2.23% [31]. The 2s/10s spread was at 31bp, per El-Erian [38].
-
[NEW] Dollar & rates — DXY near 12-month highs: BofA notes DXY is near 12-month highs, with a weak payroll potentially triggering speculative long unwinding, while a strong print could push USD toward their Q3 EUR/USD 1.12 target [11]. The dollar’s asymmetric risk profile is notable — data misses could trigger larger moves than beats [35].
-
[NEW] Dollar & rates — BofA CTA front-end shorts vulnerable: BofA notes that CTA front-end rate shorts are “particularly vulnerable” after this week’s yield rebound, with the 2-year yield needing only a 7bp decline to trigger short covering [11]. BofA recommends shorting 2-year Treasuries (target 4.25%) and holding a 2s10s flattener (target 15bp spread) [35].
-
[NEW] Liquidity — record US equity inflows: June saw ~$150bn in US equity inflows, with long-only funds setting a record ~$180bn [33]. However, BofA notes positioning is crowded and “pain trades” include stocks down and bonds up [33].
-
[NEW] Credit & banking — credit spreads slightly wider: IG credit spreads widened 2bp to 74bp, HY widened 13bp to 270bp [26]. Bank lending standards have not yet tightened but warrant monitoring [39].
-
[NEW] Precious metals — gold bounces above $4,000: Gold rose 0.66% to $4,057 on the ADP miss, breaking back above $4,000 [40][41]. Warsh’s less hawkish commentary was cited as supportive [41]. June monthly performance: gold -11.4%, silver -21.6% [26].
-
[NEW] Oil — collapsed in June: Brent -20.8% in June, WTI -20.4% [26]. The oil decline is a powerful disinflationary tailwind that the bond market is pricing in via falling breakevens [42][43].
4. Global Central-Bank Linkages
-
[NEW] ECB — Lagarde at Sintra: ECB President Lagarde said Europe is “not in stagflation,” that the euro area’s inflation and growth risks are “more balanced now than a few weeks ago” [18]. She said the only regret regarding forward guidance was “having been constrained by it in the past” [18]. ECB’s Kaasik said “one more rate hike is a reasonable expectation” [44]. Amundi expects the ECB to hike once more within the year [29].
-
[NEW] BOE — Bailey at Sintra: BOE Governor Bailey said energy prices have fallen, that forward guidance “becomes quite tricky after a period,” that the UK economy and labor market are slowing with the output gap widening [18]. He said he is “not considering rate cuts now” and that policy has already tightened “without rate hikes” [18]. Traders are pricing 20bp of BOE rate hikes by year-end [45].
-
[NEW] BOJ — hawkish stance continues: Nomura notes the market still prices ~58% probability of a BOJ October hike [31]. The 10-30-year Japanese government bond spread has widened to ~122bp, reflecting concerns the BOJ is “behind the curve” [31].
-
[NEW] BOC — Macklem at Sintra: Bank of Canada Governor Macklem said inflation is “significantly above target,” that the Canadian economy is “weak,” and that the BOC is “at the lower bound of the neutral rate range, roughly at the appropriate level to curb inflation” [18]. He said the question of when AI-driven disinflation will begin “remains an open question,” noting “in the short term we see computer prices rising” [18].
5. Asset Implications
This section is inference — no [N]. Anchored to the facts above.
| Quadrant | Current probability tilt | Key asset implication | Anchoring narrative |
|---|---|---|---|
| Growth↑ + Inflation↑ | Falling | Oil↓ gold↓, bonds rally on supply-side disinflation thesis | §2 (ADP miss, ISM slowing, BofA GDP tracking lowered); §1 (Warsh: inflation risks declined); §3 (oil -20% in June, breakevens falling) |
| Growth↑ + Inflation↓ | Rising | Stocks find support from Warsh’s dovish nuance; bonds maintain bid; gold bounces | §1 (Warsh: “inflation expectations down”, “risks receded”); §2 (ADP 98k, labor market softening signals); §3 (gold above $4,000, front-end yields falling) — Goldilocks window opening |
| Growth↓ + Inflation↑ | Falling | Stagflation tail fading; gold volatility remains but oil decline reduces energy-inflation risk | §2 (growth decelerating but not recessionary — BofA 2.1% GDP, ISM still >53); §3 (credit spreads only marginally wider, bank lending not yet tightening) |
| Growth↓ + Inflation↓ | Rising | Long-duration bonds attract flows if NFP misses; Morgan Stanley’s “no hike, two cuts in 2027” scenario gained credibility | §1 (Morgan Stanley: no hike this year, two cuts in 2027; Amundi: no move); §2 (ADP miss, jobless claims rising, CBRE confidence falling) |
Stock-bond correlation call: The regime is in a fragile transition toward growth-driven (negative correlation), reinforced by Warsh’s Sintra speech and the ADP miss. The 2-year yield’s decline on the ADP data and gold’s bounce above $4,000 are classic negative-correlation signals — bonds rally on a weaker labor market signal, while gold benefits from a lower rate-hike premium. The critical structural support is the oil-led disinflation: Brent at ~$72, WTI at ~$69, with breakevens collapsing as the bond market prices a supply-driven end to the energy inflation spike. The BofA CTA analysis — that 2-year shorts are vulnerable to a 7bp decline [11] — confirms the asymmetric risk to the downside for yields.
However, the transition remains incomplete. The market still prices ~80% probability of a September hike [11], and the FOMC is “split down the middle” [24]. The El-Erian observation that the 2s/10s spread is at 31bp [38] confirms the curve is still flattening on front-end hike premium, not re-steepening on a growth scare. The regime will only lock in as negative-correlation if June NFP prints below ~110k — the BofA scenario where 2-year yields fall 5-20bp [35] — which would collapse the front-end hike premium and steepen the curve.
Risk-budget implication:
- Overweight the belly of the curve (5-year sector) — Amundi views the 5-year yield near 4.5% as an attractive accumulation level [29]. The BofA CTA short-covering threshold at 7bp below current 2-year yield makes the front-end vulnerable to a sharp rally if NFP misses [11].
- Overweight a tactical curve steepener — if NFP misses, the front-end repricing will steepen the curve as rate-hike expectations unwind. BofA’s 2s10s flattener (target 15bp) [35] is the positioning for a hot print, but the asymmetric risk is to a bull-steepener on a weak print.
- Underweight nominal long-duration — the 10-year at 4.49% [37] has room to move to 4.50-4.70% on a hot NFP. The Deutsche Bank tokenization research [32] supports long-term QT potential, pressuring the long end. However, Morgan Stanley’s call that the bond market is “pricing too hawkishly” [28] argues for a tactical duration add if NFP misses.
- Overweight gold tactically — gold has bounced to $4,057 on the Warsh dovish nuance and ADP miss [10][40]. The Pepperstone view that Warsh’s speech is a “net positive for gold” [40] is supported by the declining inflation risk tone. However, the World Gold Association scenario of one hike in October [10] caps the upside. A short-term tactical long with a stop below $3,950 (the recent low) has favorable risk/reward into NFP.
- Underweight the USD — BofA’s asymmetric risk analysis shows the dollar is vulnerable to a sharper decline on a data miss than it would rally on a beat [35]. The crowded USD positioning ($29.4bn long speculative positions per prior briefings) adds to the unwind risk. A short USD position against a basket of low-beta currencies (JPY, CHF) hedges the risk that NFP disappoints.
6. Contrarian & Tail Risks
-
Consensus fragility — the Warsh “reflexivity” risk: Warsh’s strategy of removing forward guidance and letting the market set rates creates a reflexive dynamic: if the market prices a high probability of a hike, the resulting financial tightening makes the hike less likely — and the Fed may then “do the opposite of what the market has priced” [46]. The 2015 September precedent — where the market priced >90% probability of a hike and the Fed didn’t deliver [46] — is the exact template for this risk. If the market continues to price ~80% September probability [11], Warsh may choose to hold simply to assert independence, which would trigger a violent unwind of the hawkish repricing.
-
Consensus fragility — BofA’s asymmetric risk call: The BofA analysis — that Bloomberg’s median NFP forecast is at the 2026 high with low dispersion, meaning downside risk is elevated [35]; that CTA front-end shorts are vulnerable to a 7bp yield decline [11]; and that the dollar has an asymmetric response to data misses [35] — describes a market structure where a single data miss triggers a nonlinear unwind. The “pain trade” is “stocks down, bonds up” per Barclays [33], meaning a weak NFP would be the most disruptive scenario for crowded bullish positioning.
-
Consensus fragility — Morgan Stanley’s counter-consensus call: Morgan Stanley explicitly argues the bond market is pricing too hawkishly — that the Fed’s dot plot should be “interpreted with caution” [28], that core PCE will run below the SEP’s path [27], and that the Fed will not hike this year and will cut twice in 2027 [28]. This is a minority view — BofA, BNP Paribas, and Deutsche Bank are all in the “hike this year” camp — but Morgan Stanley’s track record on interest rate positioning last year makes it a credible contrarian signal.
-
Consensus fragility — Fidelity’s “premature victory” risk: Timmer argues that TIPS breakevens are “plummeting because of declining oil prices and faith that Fed Chair Warsh will get inflation back down to 2%” — and asks whether the bond market is “declaring victory too soon” [42]. If inflation proves stickier than the breakeven decline implies — particularly if core services remain elevated and AI-related capex keeps demand strong — the breakeven rally would snap back, driving nominal yields sharply higher.
-
Second-order — Warsh’s balance sheet preference is a tail for liquidity: Warsh explicitly stated his preference for shrinking the Fed’s balance sheet [18] and said the balance sheet “borders on fiscal policy” [47]. The Deutsche Bank research suggesting tokenization could reduce reserve demand by $250bn [32] supports an accelerated QT path. A faster-than-expected QT would drain reserves, tighten USD liquidity, and pressure risk assets — particularly if it coincides with a weak NFP environment.
-
Second-order — Trump White House pressure on Fed: White House adviser Kevin Hassett suggested that “some Fed officials might favor rate hikes for political reasons,” targeting Governor Jerome Powell specifically [1]. This adds political pressure to Fed decision-making and could complicate the independence narrative Warsh is trying to establish.
-
Second-order — KOSPI circuit breaker and Asian contagion: The KOSPI triggered a circuit breaker on June 23, falling ~10% as foreign investors net sold over 4 trillion won [39]. This Asian equity selloff — driven by the global hawkish pivot and AI concentration risk — represents a potential contagion channel to US markets. The Nasdaq’s ~3.3% single-day drop [39] shows the channel is already active.
-
Source quality control: Warsh’s Sintra speech facts [18]-[48] are mostly from single-source unverified social posts (Financial Juice) and focused on individual statements, not full transcripts. BofA’s analysis [22][35] is primary institutional research. Morgan Stanley’s call [27][28] is primary. The Barclays flow report [33] is primary. The CME FedWatch data [30][9] is standard market data. The BNP Paribas forecast [25] is secondary. The Warsh “2025 likely no rate cut” detail [37] is from secondary Bloomberg reporting. Politico’s note on other Fed officials filling the void [21] is primary investigative journalism.
Appendix: Additional Sources
- [49] 格隆汇 — (no specific new Fed facts beyond CME pricing)
- [50] Bloomberg — Analysts concerned about increased market volatility from reduced Fed communication
- [43] @deerpointmacro — Market pricing more hawkish than economists expect, but easing inflation suggests policy less restrictive
- [51] @deerpointmacro — Same as [43], duplicate
- [52] Andreas Steno — Dollar strength from Fed turning hawkish as inflation rolled over
This report is a macro-mechanism analysis, not investment advice.
30-day review of this series 6/18 – 7/18
-
Hawkish FOMC debut and the disinflation counterwave: Chair Warsh’s June meeting—a 9-9 dot-plot tie for 2026 hikes, stripped forward guidance, and sharply higher inflation forecasts—triggered a violent repricing of rate expectations. Over the following weeks, soft June CPI and PPI readings collapsed July hike probability to near 11%, but a wall of Fed speakers (Logan, Jefferson, Schmid) warned against declaring victory, keeping the standoff alive.
-
Labor market softening tests the hawkish consensus: The June payrolls miss of +57k—well below consensus—undermined the “employment overheating” pillar and pushed the first fully priced hike from October to December. Yet the FOMC minutes and subsequent official commentary continued to emphasize inflation persistence, preventing a full dovish pivot.
-
Warsh’s communication overhaul raises volatility: The new chair abolished forward guidance, slashed the FOMC statement to 130 words, and launched five task forces to review communication, balance sheet, and data use. This structural shift made every data release and meeting a “live” event, amplifying market sensitivity to incoming prints.
-
Dollar and rate-path divergence widens: The dollar rallied to a one-year high on the hawkish repricing, then retreated as disinflation data emerged, while BofA’s three-hike forecast stood in stark contrast to market pricing of less than one hike. The gap between institutional forecasts and market pricing remained the widest in the cycle.
-
Global central bank divergence intensifies: The BOJ raised rates to 1.0% and signaled further hikes, the ECB resumed tightening, and the BOE held, while the Fed’s uncertain path created asymmetric cross-currents for EM FX and carry trades, with the yen carry trade reaching 2008-level risk.
Sources52
- “新美联储通讯社”:沃什称通胀风险下降,但拒绝透露7月是否加息
- 沃什:通胀风险已有所下降
- Fed's Warsh: Expectations of inflation over the first four weeks have come down.
- Are Higher Rates Warranted? The Fed Chairman Declines to Say.
- Are Higher Rates Warranted? The Fed Chairman Declines to Say.
- 沃什:7月会议将会有激烈的内部争论,AI通胀效应应由央行研判
- 沃什:不会给出前瞻性指引
- 沃什称美联储将开辟新路径,重申不提供前瞻性指引
- ADP数据公布前 美联储7月维持利率不变的概率为66.3%
- 金价暴跌30%后,黄金的“下半场”悬念丛生
- 今晚,沃什时代首份非农出炉,世界杯或营造就业"虚火"
- Fed's Warsh: Inflation risks have come down.
- Fed's Chair Warsh: Forward guidance is not the right policy for the current moment.
- Fed's Chair Warsh: I want interest rate policy to be the key policy tool.
- Fed's Warsh: Balance sheet works mostly through asset prices.
- Fed's Chair Warsh: Will ask the best minds from inside and outside the US
- Fed's Warsh: We will likely have news next week on leaders of task forces.
- 美欧英加四大央行掌门人发言要点一览
- 🇺🇸 Warsh’s speech yesterday was more important than it looked as it clearly felt like an attempt to take back control of the narrative around t...
- Warsh faces multiple alternative inflation signs as Fed charts new course
- 'Free for all': Where markets are getting their Fed news as Warsh stays mum
- 美联储官员讲话减少:沃什意愿或成主因,关注ISM制造业指数
- Fed's Chair Warsh: There will be dots at least for the short time
- Live: Fed's Warsh, ECB's Lagarde Panel at Sintra Conference
- Market Talk: 'Three back-to-back Fed hikes' seen from December
- 摩根士丹利:全球资金流向月报 - 6月回顾与跨资产策略展望
- 沃什讲话略显鸽派但仍避免指引:摩根士丹利维持美联储年内按兵不动预期
- 如果美联储今年按兵不动,我们看好什么:对美国利率、股票和CRE/REITs的影响
- 全球投资观点
- 美联储7月维持利率不变的概率为71.7%
- 野村晨会报告:利率市场偏离前瞻指引,科技股波动下经济复苏预期升温
- 代币化融资市场与未来金融基础设施:对利率市场的潜在影响
- 美股主导,广度扩张:资金流向与持仓分析
- 数据脱敏还是风暴前夜:6月非农会否再掀巨浪?
- 6月非农就业报告前瞻:市场热度上升,强化2026年加息预期
- 沃什承认通胀风险降温,但重申不会提前释放宽松路线图;世界杯阶段性用工正在抬高表面就业数字,但美国底层劳动力需求的真实成色,可能远没有头条那么亮眼。
- Treasuries Slip Before Payrolls as Traders Weigh Warsh Comments
- ... The Sintra focus now shifts to Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh. Will he just stick closely to what he said at the FOMC press conference, or will...
- [国投证券(香港)]宏观弱化但整体稳健,泡沫苗头需持续关注:鹰浪席卷、领先板块获利了结
- 沃什“鸽派”转向扑灭加息火苗,黄金企稳4000美元,折射利率路径重新定价
- Gold Gains, Helped by Central Banker Commentary, Economic Data
- What could prompt yields to head into the danger zone? Inflation, for one. While TIPS break-evens are plummeting because of declining oil prices (and ...
- Markets still price a more hawkish Fed than many economists expect. Inflation expectations continue to ease alongside lower energy prices, suggesting ...
- ECB's Kaasik: One more rate hike is a reasonable expectation.
- Traders pare BoE wagers, pricing 20 BPS of rate hikes by year-end.
- 沃什的“叛逆”逻辑:让市场引导联储 但联储随时可能不跟
- Fed's Warsh: Balance sheet borders on fiscal policy.
- Fed's Warsh: We'll chart a new course so we can make better decisions.
- 分析师:澳洲联储在下次利率决议前面临诸多挑战
- Wall Street Worries Less Fed Talk Will Spur Market Volatility
- Markets still price a more hawkish Fed than many economists expect. Inflation expectations continue to ease alongside lower energy prices, suggesting ...
- The reason for the strong USD in one chart. The Fed turned hawkish, when inflation rolled over.