sembr.live
中

Fed Watch

Hike odds push toward 70% as Barr backs "decisive" action and the oil shock tests Warsh's marker; 10Y near 4.8%

The hawkish repricing consolidated higher — September hike odds now sit near 66–70% after Governor Barr conditionally endorsed "decisive" rate action if inflation fails to moderate and renewed US-Iran strikes pushed Brent above $92 ; the 10Y reached ~4.8%, its highest since early 2025 , with Friday's payrolls and the Sept-11 CPI set to arbitrate .

57 sources ~44 min

0. Weekly Arc

Over the past week, Warsh’s Jackson Hole debut reset the policy default from “hold unless data force action” to “hike unless data excuse it” — flipping September odds from roughly a third toward two-thirds, and now to ~66–70% as renewed US-Iran strikes pushed Brent above $92 and Governor Barr conditionally supported “decisive” rate action. The 10-year UST repriced to ~4.80%, its highest since early 2025, while Japan, the UK and Germany printed multi-year or multi-decade yield records; equities have so far absorbed the shock near records. Friday’s payrolls, today’s Beige Book/ISM/ADP, and the Sept-11 CPI are the named arbiters.

1. Policy Narrative & Expectations

The marginal repricing over the past ~24h is escalation rather than new narrative content: September hike odds climbed from yesterday’s 64–66% band to a 66–70% area (WSJ/CME 70%, up from 37% a week earlier [1]; Nomura 68% [2]; CBS/FedWatch 66% [3]; Reuters “roughly two-in-three” [4]; UBS ~60% [5]), with markets pricing near-100% by the October meeting and ~37bp cumulatively by year-end [5]. The logic stack now has three layers: Warsh’s Jackson Hole reaction function [6][7]; Barr’s conditional “act decisively” language [8][9]; and an oil shock that monetary policy cannot directly address [10]. House views remain split on delivery — Barclays/SocGen/DB economists pencil in September and December hikes [11], while Goldman expects ~0.2% August core prints to support a hold and reverse the front-end rise [12], and Conference Board chief economist Peterson says the Fed can hold given early demand erosion [13].

1.1 FOMC Officials’ Remarks

  • [NEW] Hawkish: Governor Michael Barr (Washington remarks, 9/1) — if inflation “appears not to be moderating sufficiently,” the Fed “should act decisively to raise rates,” but policymakers can take more time if data trends restore confidence that inflation is on a path to 2% [8][9]. He stressed inflation has run above target for more than five years, that tariffs, the Middle East conflict and AI-infrastructure investment have stalled disinflation, and that core non-housing-services inflation remains elevated [14][15][16]. This is the first sitting-Governor endorsement of the “hike unless data excuse it” framing since Jackson Hole.
  • [ONGOING] Chair Kevin Warsh (listed separately): no fresh remarks in the past 24h; the 8/28 Jackson Hole frame remains the anchor — 2% PCE is “firm, fixed,” the policy rate is the best tool, and there is “work to do” unless underlying inflation moves “clearly and fast enough” toward target, with no return to rate-path forward guidance and a “hall of mirrors” warning [6][7][11].
  • [NEW] Scheduled later today (9/2): Governors Christopher Waller, Cleveland Fed President Beth Hammack, and Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee are all on the speaking calendar [17].

1.2 Policy Signals & Institutional Communication

  • [NEW] Barr’s prepared-remarks construction mirrors Warsh’s test: patience if data confirm disinflation, “decisive” hikes if not — effectively formalizing a symmetric data-contingency into the September discussion [16][9].
  • [NEW] Loretta Mester (former Cleveland Fed president, via Deutsche Bank interview): strongly defends the explicit 2% point target — changing it while inflation is above target would be “moving the goalposts”; argues supply shocks are now too persistent to look through, and that AI may eventually raise R* (the equilibrium real rate) [18].
  • [NEW] Inflation Task Force: Warsh’s announced Mankiw–Sargent–White task force is expected to focus on decision-making under high uncertainty, fiscal-dominance effects, and monetary–financial-stability links [18].
  • [ESCALATED] Bessent’s counter-narrative: Treasury Secretary Bessent dismissed the yield move as “not a dire situation” [19][20], argued on CNBC that US productivity growth will neutralize inflation concerns and that high prices are a temporary supply shock [21], and said bond yields are showing “inflation expectations flat to down” [22] — the fiscal-side rebuttal to the Fed’s hawkish drift.
  • [ONGOING] Political pressure: Trump reiterated that rates are “too high,” while saying he has “great respect” for Warsh, who will “do what he has to do” [16][11].
  • [NEW] Brokerage read (China): Wanlian Securities concludes the Jackson Hole tone was hawkish but September-hike conditions are not yet sufficient, pushing expected hike timing later [7]; China Post Securities (中邮证券) similarly sees a September hold as more likely, with a Hormuz/Middle-East energy shock as the key hawkish tail [23].
  • [NEW] Calendar: the Fed’s Beige Book is due today, 9/2 [17].

2. Key Data & Market Read

  • [NEW] Today’s US calendar: ADP national employment report (August), July durable-goods and factory orders, and the Beige Book are scheduled for 9/2 [17]; ISM manufacturing is expected at 54.5 vs 55.6 prior, with the S&P Global manufacturing PMI at 53.3 vs 53.2 [24].
  • [NEW] BLS preliminary payroll benchmark revision (QCEW-based): nonfarm payrolls through March 2026 revised down by 79k and private payrolls by 178k — BofA reads this as far less negative than expected/history (reflecting below-trend immigration in the QCEW measure) and as easing Fed concern about labor-market weakness ahead of September [24]; China Post Securities reads the same revision as evidence employment momentum is cooling, supporting a hold [23].
  • [NEW] Goldman’s August preview (projection): expects nonfarm payrolls at +40k, below consensus, with unemployment holding at 4.1% on lower participation rather than job growth — “little sign of labor-market overheating” — and August core CPI/PCE near 0.2% m/m, which would keep the Fed on hold and push front-end yields lower [12].
  • [ONGOING] August inflation timing: the August CPI lands Sept 11, days before the Sept 15–16 FOMC [14][16]; a sticky print would intensify internal hawkish pressure [14]. A methodological update to PCE later this month is expected to revise measured inflation lower [13].
  • [ESCALATED] Narrative impact: the data story is genuinely two-sided — the benchmark revision and Goldman’s +40k payrolls forecast point to a cooling labor market, while euro-area inflation at a three-year high and oil above $92 point the other way — making Friday’s NFP the “deciding factor” for whether the hike trade can keep heating up [25][13].

3. Financial-Conditions Signals

  • [ESCALATED] Rates — new YTD highs: the 10Y touched 4.80% on 9/1, the highest since early 2025 [20][26], and was at 4.81–4.82% on 9/2 morning [27][28]; the 30Y sits near 5.25–5.29%, around a two-decade high [28][3]; the 2Y is near-flat at 4.37–4.40% [28][3]; the 5Y touched 4.55%, its highest since October 2025 [20][29]. The 10Y real yield is ~2.44%, with 10Y breakevens at ~2.3–2.36% [10][2].
  • [ESCALATED] Global yields at multi-year/decade records: Japan’s 10Y broke above 3% for the first time since 1996 [4][30]; UK 10Y gilts reached ~5.14%, the highest since mid-2007 [20][31]; German 10Y reached 3.33–3.35%, levels last seen in 2011 [20][30]; UK 30Y gilts hit their highest since 1998 [5][21]; a Bloomberg global-yield gauge reached 3.72%, the highest since June 2008 [3]; euro-area 1y1y OIS broke above 3.0% for the first time [5].
  • [NEW] Driver debate — rate-path repricing vs supply: Nomura and UBS attribute the global move mainly to upward repricing of US terminal/neutral-rate expectations, not worsening supply-demand (cash bonds have become expensive vs swaps) [2][32][33]; Guojin Macro notes vs August 2022 the 10Y nominal is ~170bp higher but the real yield ~200bp higher with no rise in breakevens — “the long end is not trading an inflation-risk premium” [10]. Citi concurs that IG/hyperscaler supply is not the main driver (policy expectations, geopolitics-oil and weaker real-money duration demand matter more), though super-long IG issuance is a growing second-order risk eroding pension demand for 30Y STRIPS [34]. The opposing camp — Reuters’ bond-investor sourcing — still emphasizes fewer price-insensitive buyers and structural supply/demand strains [35][30].
  • [NEW] Liquidity & volatility: MOVE rose to 77.9 and VIX to 16.3 [2][32]; investors have paid millions in premium on Treasury options to hedge further losses [36]; managers describe the repricing as orderly, with the BofA MOVE gauge still near five-year lows and no crisis signals in Treasury trading [37]. Swap spreads across major maturities have continued to narrow, while 2026 volatility/liquidity indices are higher [38].
  • [ESCALATED] Dollar: the index is retesting 100 [25], but Deutsche Bank notes the hawkish Warsh speech and higher yields did not lift USD — the dollar is only modestly cheap vs front-end yields, its yield appeal is not top-tier in G10, and it looks range-bound [39]; UBS says de-dollarization fears have receded and the dollar is fundamentally supported, recommending fading EURUSD rallies above ~1.17 [5]. USD/JPY trades in the 160.0–160.5 range [2][32].
  • [ESCALATED] Gold: spot fell 1.2% to $4,384.46 [40], extending the post-Jackson-Hole correction (weekly -3.24% to $4,453.67 through 8/28 [41]); prediction markets have sharply cut the odds of gold challenging highs by year-end [42]. UBS stays constructive long-term on fiscal/debt worries, noting ETF holdings +3% and speculative positioning +31% since mid-July [5].
  • [NEW] Credit & banking: the S&P 500 earnings yield minus the 10Y has been negative since 2024, and investors are pushing Treasury-vs-IG spreads “extremely narrow” as the Treasury competes for the same long-term capital pool [35][37]; AI-related tech firms now account for 37.9% of US nonfinancial corporate issuance (2026 YTD), with ~$300bn issued in the first eight months [10]. US banks still carry ~$320bn of unrealized losses [10]; cloud/semiconductor CDS have widened (roughly 10bp for Microsoft/Meta/Alphabet, 45–70bp for Nvidia/Broadcom/Oracle, ~300bp for CoreWeave since early June) [38]; the USD IG market has surpassed $10tn [34]. The US personal saving rate fell to 2.6% in July, near a historical low [38]. The average 30-year fixed mortgage rate is near a one-year high [20][29].

4. Global Central-Bank Linkages

  • [ESCALATED] ECB: euro-area consumer prices rose ~3.3% y/y in August, the fastest in nearly three years, energizing expectations of a hike at next week’s meeting [19][20][29]; per Bundesbank’s Nagel, markets price a >95% probability of a September hike [43]. UBS expects a hike next week with a hold in December but ~50bp of further 2026 scope, and argues the 28bp of ECB tightening priced by EURIBOR Z6/Z7 is justified by resilient growth — “don’t fade the 2027 tightening pricing” [33]. UBS’s DeepSpeak tool shows ECB rate/inflation sentiment has shifted most since March, lifting real-rate expectations and partly offsetting US term-premium spillovers [33]. Ireland’s Makhlouf (single source / unverified via FT relay) says the ECB “must be prepared to lift interest rates” and is “uneasy” over inflation [44]. Note UBS’s framing: cross-market long-end moves are predominantly policy-path repricing, not term-premium surges [33].
  • [ESCALATED] BOJ: 10Y JGBs breached 3% for the first time since 1996 [4]; Ueda hinted at a September hike as bets mount [45]; Goldman pulled its BOJ-hike forecast forward to September 2026 from January 2027 [12]; markets price a 68% September probability with 17bp for the meeting and cumulative hikes of 25bp by October and 40bp by December [32]. The US Treasury, after Bessent met Ueda, issued a statement strongly supporting “decisive market and currency measures” to address the yen’s “serious undervaluation,” and Bessent said “Abenomics” reflation may have run its course [2][32]. Nomura sees 5Y JGBs heading to ~2.5% (top of the BOJ’s neutral range) and 10Y toward ~3.25%, with equities potentially softening materially around that point, and cautions that aggressive domestic BOJ tightening to fight a US-led move would be premature [2][32]. UBS flags BOJ inaction as the key USDJPY tail risk: it would damage credibility, push USDJPY sharply above 160 and invite larger intervention, after Japan’s record $96.5bn two-day intervention in July [5].
  • [NEW] Others (UK/BOE): UK 30Y gilt yields reached their highest since 1998, pressuring fiscal arithmetic ahead of the autumn budget; the Resolution Foundation estimates UK fiscal space has fallen below £8bn from £23.6bn in March [5]. Huatai summarizes the broader regime as “the global easing cycle has essentially ended,” with policy rates clearly above pre-cycle levels [38].

5. Asset Implications

This section is inference — anchored to the facts above.

QuadrantCurrent probability tiltKey asset implicationAnchoring narrative
Growth↑ + Inflation↑RisingCommodities/TIPS express the oil + AI-capex reflation leg best (Brent >$92, gasoline >$4/gal [13][21]); long nominal bonds stay blocked — real yields at 2.44% are the driver, not breakevens [10][2]§1.2 / §2 / §3
Growth↑ + Inflation↓FallingGoldman’s ~0.2% core + +40k payrolls path supports front-end/belly carry and a reversal of the front-end rise [12]; equities remain near records on a +33% Q2 earnings print, negative ERP since 2024 [37]§2 / §3
Growth↓ + Inflation↑Rising (tail)The oil-shock stagflation leg — prolonged Iran war, second-round wage/pricing risk [14][46]; gold is the hedge but mid-correction at $4,384 [40]; long bonds do not hedge; banks’ $320bn unrealized losses are the fragility node [10]§2 / §3 / §6
Growth↓ + Inflation↓FallingThe hold-camp scenario (Wanlian, China Post, Conference Board): soft payrolls + PCE re-basing → a September hold and partial unwind of hike pricing [13][7][23]§1.2 / §2

Stock-bond correlation call: the regime is currently in the inflation- and policy-driven positive-correlation configuration hardest for risk parity — BofA notes the stock-bond correlation has flipped positive and is at its highest level since the 1990s, so investors are “no longer willing to pay the same premium” for bonds’ hedging utility [30]. The nuance this week is that the long-end move is being driven less by inflation expectations (breakevens 2.3–2.36%, essentially flat vs the 2022 episode) and more by real rates and the repricing of terminal/neutral policy expectations [10][2][33] — meaning duration and equities are being repriced by the same policy variable. BNY Mellon’s “battle of attrition” framing captures the risk: persistent inflation, fiscal concerns and energy risk keep pushing investors to demand more compensation [31], while a disorderly, sudden yield surge — not a gradual one — is the scenario in which equities react violently [37].

Risk-budget implication: Under a positive stock-bond correlation regime, long-end nominal duration loses hedging value exactly when equities need it; the cleaner hedges are gold (UBS constructive on fiscal/debt grounds [5]) and oil-linked inflation exposure, with Huatai’s “gold + tech barbell” as the explicit expression of funding-risk-plus-AI-delivery [38]. Overweight front-end/belly carry and cash while the 66–70% hike pricing holds, and express the hawkish tail through curve/option structures (Treasury options are already rich with hedge demand [36]) rather than fighting the front end. Underweight 30Y duration into the ~5.28% area — Citi’s work shows super-long IG issuance is eroding pension demand for 30Y STRIPS, a localized structural pressure [34] — and treat the 5.0% 10Y level as the psychological threshold where equity de-risking could accelerate [47][37]. Reduce credit-beta concentration at historical-low spreads; the “interest-rate-risk-becoming-credit-risk” transition is the live tail [48].

6. Contrarian & Tail Risks

  • Consensus fragility: the market is pricing roughly two-in-three odds of a September hike [11], and sell-side chatter now extends to a 50bp September move or consecutive September–October hikes [49] — which feels like “fever pitch” to at least one macro strategist [49]. The contrarian stack is thick: Goldman expects ~0.2% core prints and +40k payrolls to support a hold and reverse the front-end rise [12]; Wanlian and China Post Securities see September-hike conditions as insufficient [7][23]; the Conference Board says the Fed can hold given demand erosion [13]; and PCE re-basing later this month should revise measured inflation lower [13]. Conversely, BofA warns “the onus is on Warsh to deliver” after laying down a hike marker, or he risks the credibility he just regained [13], and former Fed adviser Tetlow notes Warsh’s transparent campaign “makes the scrutiny that much more intense” if August data don’t line up with the September decision [13]. Falsifiable pillars: (1) August payrolls near Goldman’s +40k with unemployment at 4.1% on participation, not hiring [12]; (2) August core CPI near +0.2% m/m [12]; (3) the PCE methodology revision lands as expected [13]; (4) Brent and Hormuz risk stabilize, since a 25bp hike “cannot reopen shipping lanes” [10]; (5) Barr’s “confidence in data” condition is met one way or the other [8][9].
  • Second-order transmission: fiscal feedback is the dominant structural tail — US federal debt topped $40tn (~6% of GDP deficit), and concern about the fiscal trajectory can itself push yields higher, raising debt-service costs [20][29][50][35]; Huatai flags a possible Q1-2027 debt-ceiling hit and does not rule out a repeat of the 2023 “bond-issuance crisis” dynamic, with the Treasury basis trade as the high-leverage vulnerability to monitor [38]. El-Erian warns the longer yields persist, the more markets will worry that interest-rate risk is turning into credit risk [48]. The AI-financing chain is the decisive medium-term variable: ~$730bn of big-tech AI infrastructure spending expected in 2026 (much of it borrowed) [35], with cloud-vendor FCF deteriorating, per S&P, from -$43.4bn in 2026 toward -$268.7bn in 2027 [38] — if AI revenue does not materialize, today’s “costs” become debt, liquidity and valuation risks, and long-end yields could go even higher [10]. Banks’ $320bn of unrealized losses could convert into liquidity problems if high rates persist [10], and CICC projects that if long-end yields and dollar funding conditions keep tightening, policy may shift toward financial repression, including Fed balance-sheet expansion [51]. Central-bank independence is the political wildcard: markets remain unconvinced Warsh’s decisions are insulated from White House pressure given Trump’s very public rate-cut campaign [16][11].
  • Source quality control: September odds are a band, not a point — 70% (WSJ/CME [1]), 68% (Nomura [2]), 66% (CBS/FedWatch [3]), ~two-thirds (Reuters [4]), ~60% (UBS [5]), with 57% being the immediate post-Jackson-Hole read [41] — the dispersion itself reflects a fast-moving repricing. Yield levels conflict across snapshots and fixes (4.78–4.82% for the 10Y [47][28][27]; Brent above $92 vs “$95” per Seattle Times [31][19]) — treat as intraday bands. The “two Saudi crude tankers struck in the Strait of Hormuz” detail is single-source social [52][53], though consistent with wire-reported oil moves [21]. Makhlouf’s FT comments [44], BOJ’s Takata [54], Bessent’s “flat to down” inflation-expectations line [22], and the Barr relays on AI [55][56] are single-source/social items. Direct interpretive conflicts: BofA reads the -79k benchmark revision as easing labor-market concern [24], while China Post reads the same revision as evidence of labor weakness supporting a hold [23]; and the supply-demand explanation for long-end yields (Reuters [35]) conflicts directly with the Nomura/UBS/Citi decomposition (rate-path repricing) [2][32][33][34] — volume of commentary on either side is not confirmation.

Appendix: Additional Sources

  • [13] Reuters — Warsh’s September near coin-flip; BofA “onus to deliver”
  • [10] Guojin Macro — long-end driven by real rates; AI financing as national project
  • [51] CICC Research — fiscal ceiling on long-end yields; financial-repression path
  • [26] Associated Press — global yield surge mechanics and intervention context
  • [33] UBS — cross-market policy-path repricing; ECB 2027 pricing
  • [46] WSJ — Iran war complicating Fed’s next move; Barr’s conditional support
  • [50] Reuters — transmission of higher yields; bond-vigilante risk
  • [57] NYT — global sell-off, $40tn debt, AI borrowing binge
  • [24] BofA Merrill Lynch — payroll benchmark revision; Q3 GDP tracking 2.5%
  • [41] Tianfeng Securities — Jackson Hole weekly review; curve flattening; gold pullback

This report is a macro-mechanism analysis, not investment advice.

30-day review of this series 8/6 – 9/5

  • September-hike odds round-tripped on the data-Fed seesaw. Pricing swung from a mid-August dovish low near 27% after soft payrolls and cooling CPI to a post-Jackson-Hole peak near 66–70% as Warsh’s hawkish keynote and Barr’s “act decisively” language took over, then settled back to a coin flip after Waller’s conditional-hold tilt—with the Sept-11 CPI installed as the arbiter.

  • The long end repeatedly defied both the Fed and the Treasury. The 30-year climbed to 2007-era highs above 5.3% despite Bessent’s Aug-19 buyback expansion, whose relief faded within days; the driver narrative shifted from rate-path repricing to a term-premium and real-rate wall.

  • The policy default flipped from “hold unless data force action” to “hike unless data excuse it,” then partially reversed. Warsh’s Aug-28 debut and Barr’s remarks set the hawkish marker, but Williams and Waller’s pushback restored a genuine two-variable fight over whether disinflation or hot core readings govern the September decision.

  • Fed communication itself became a market-moving storyline. Warsh’s “play the ball, not the referee” guidance pullback, the meeting-count reform trial balloon, and the renewed Cook-removal attempt each lifted the policy-uncertainty premium, making every data release behave like a mini-FOMC.

  • The dollar weakened while gold absorbed the fiscal-credibility risk. The DXY slid from near 100 to three-month lows below 99 as Treasury activism fueled de-dollarization chatter, while gold oscillated between rate-driven corrections near $4,400 and debasement-led peaks above $4,600.

  • Global central banks tightened around the Fed’s indecision. BOJ September-hike odds consolidated near 75–84% and the ECB’s path hardened, while coordinated yen intervention and the FIMA channel added a second-order Treasury-demand layer to the long-end story.

Sources57

  1. Odds of Fed Rate Hike in September Hit 70% WSJ Score 66
  2. 美日收益率上升背后的不便真相：供需未恶化，美联储加息预期主导 外资研报 Score 62
  3. Rising bond yields threaten to push up U.S. borrowing costs, experts say. Here's what to know. CBS News Score 64
  4. COMMENTARY: Morning Bid: September storm Reuters Score 60
  5. 瑞银全球外汇策略：去美元化担忧消退，关注美联储9月议息会议 外资研报 Score 64
  6. 杰克逊霍尔会议要点：美联储主席沃什的讲话与市场反应 外资研报 Score 62
  7. [万联证券]2026杰克逊霍尔年会点评：明晰货币政策原则，延续鹰派表态 内资宏观研究 Score 65
  8. Fed governor Michael Barr says he would back a September rate increase if inflation “appears not to be moderating sufficiently.” The key outlook pas... Twitter·财经快讯 Score 61
  9. 美联储理事巴尔：若通胀未降温，应做好加息准备 格隆汇快讯 Score 61
  10. 宋雪涛：加息也救不了长端利率 华尔街见闻 Score 60
  11. COMMENTARY: Warsh scored an easy win in Jackson Hole. The hard work starts now Reuters Score 60
  12. 宏观研究焦点：债券收益率上升、美伊冲突升级及日本央行提前加息 外资研报 Score 61
  13. Warsh's Jackson Hole encore may put Trump's inflation record under a microscope Reuters Score 61
  14. 持续半年的伊朗战争，打乱美联储9月利率决策 华尔街见闻 Score 60
  15. 美联储理事巴尔：若通胀未缓解 应做好加息准备 格隆汇快讯 Score 61
  16. 特朗普称美国利率过高，美联储理事巴尔：若通胀降温不足，应果断加息 澎湃新闻 Score 62
  17. Stock Market Today: Global Bonds Continue to Sell Off -- Live Updates WSJ Score 62
  18. 宏观大事：与前克利夫兰联储主席洛雷塔·梅斯特对话美联储通胀框架 外资研报 Score 63
  19. Bond sell-off threatens to squeeze borrowers around the world Seattle Times Score 61
  20. Why bond yields are rising and why everyone should care Seattle Times Score 63
  21. Bond yields surge and stocks tumble as inflation fears ripple through markets. NBC News Score 62
  22. US Treasury Secretary Bessent on Bond Yields: They're showing inflation expectations as flat to down. Twitter·财经快讯 Score 67
  23. [中邮证券]海外宏观周报：鹰派信号升温，数据或仍指向9月按兵不动 内资宏观研究 Score 64
  24. 晨间市场摘要：美联储基准修正缓解劳动力市场担忧，三季度GDP追踪预估2.5% 外资研报 Score 63
  25. 通胀压力仍然偏高，但就业动能已经出现降温迹象。美元重新测试100关口，周五非农将决定加息交易能否继续升温。 金十-快讯 Score 63
  26. Why bond yields are rising and why everyone should care AP News Score 63
  27. Wall Street's Direction Is Being Dictated by Oil Bloomberg Score 63
  28. Treasury yields rise as global bond sell-off continues CNBC Score 64
  29. Why bond yields are rising and why everyone should care The Independent Score 63
  30. What the Jump in Global Interest Rates Means for the Economy NYT Score 68
  31. Trump Administration Live Updates: Bessent Hosts G20 Summit as Debt Worries Roil Bond Markets NYT Score 62
  32. 松泽晨会报告：美日收益率上升背后的不便真相 外资研报 Score 61
  33. 收益率反映货币政策：不淡化2027年欧洲央行定价 外资研报 Score 62
  34. 美国利率策略：连接超大规模企业供应与美国国债收益率曲线 外资研报 Score 61
  35. No shortage of culprits in panic over long US Treasury yields Reuters Score 62
  36. Bond Traders Snap Up Protection Against Soaring Treasury Yields Bloomberg Score 63
  37. 全球长债危机，会蔓延至股市吗？ 虎嗅 Score 61
  38. 需要重视的全球“资金失衡” 华尔街见闻 Score 63
  39. 别看我——收益率或政策制定者对美元助力甚微 外资研报 Score 62
  40. Sticky Inflation Is Roiling Bond Markets Again Bloomberg Score 67
  41. 美国中期选举的历史规律 开达策略知行 Score 60
  42. 黄金上涨的乐观叙事正在遭遇现实考验。美联储鹰派信号推高加息预期，美债收益率和油价同步上行，预测市场随之大幅下调黄金年底冲击高位的概率。点击查看... 金十-快讯 Score 61
  43. ECB's Nagel: Markets see >95% probability of a September rate hike Twitter·财经快讯 Score 61
  44. 🇪🇺 *MAKHLOUF SAYS #ECB MUST BE PREPARED TO LIFT INTEREST RATES: FT *MAKHLOUF `UNEASY' OVER EUROZONE INFLATION, HE TELLS FT *MAKHLOUF TELLS FT EC... Twitter·宏观市场 Score 60
  45. 🇯🇵 #BOJ’s Ueda Hints at September Rate Hike as Bets on Move Mount - Bloomberg https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-09-02/boj-s-ueda-to-... Twitter·宏观市场 Score 64
  46. A War That Won't End Is Complicating the Fed's Next Move WSJ Score 61
  47. Rising Treasury yields could rattle US stocks as earnings season ends Reuters Score 61
  48. Good morning. The yield watch continues as the 10-year US Treasury tops 4.80% and the 30-year approaches 5.30%. The higher and longer yields persist, ... Twitter·宏观市场 Score 62
  49. Increasing sell side chatter about Fed going 50 in Sep or consecutive hikes in Sep and Oct and maybe another one in Dec. Who knows, but for now it fee... Twitter·宏观市场 Score 61
  50. Explainer: US Treasury yields are rising -- Why does it matter? Reuters Score 64
  51. 中金：中国的降息预期如何演化？ 中金点睛 Score 62
  52. Swap spreads opened mixed, with the curve continuing to compress as rising oil prices reinforced the bear-steepening move in global rates. Brent pushe... Twitter·宏观市场 Score 60
  53. Swap spreads opened mixed, with the curve continuing to compress as rising oil prices reinforced the bear-steepening move in global rates. Brent pushe... Twitter·宏观市场 Score 61
  54. BoJ's Takata: Rate hike pace should be assessed at every meeting. Generally speaking, consecutive rate hikes could be a possibility Twitter·财经快讯 Score 62
  55. Fed's Barr: AI has a lots of potential, and lots of risk. Twitter·财经快讯 Score 60
  56. Fed's Barr: The persistence of inflation above target creates risks. Twitter·财经快讯 Score 67
  57. Bond Sell-Off Threatens to Squeeze Borrowers Around the World NYT Score 61