sembr.live
中

Fed Watch

Hammack Hawkish Salvo Drives Yield-Curve Flattening, Front-End Hike Probability Holds at ~34% Ahead of NFP Binary

Cleveland Fed President Hammack delivered a concentrated hawkish message — inflation remains broad-based and too high, raising the possibility that "higher rates may be needed" — pushing the 2-year yield above 4.17% and flattening the curve, even as market-implied July hike probability stayed near a minority ~34%; Warsh is set for his first international speech later today at Sintra, and Thursday's nonfarm payrolls (UBS expecting +80k vs consensus +110k) are the next binary pivot for the hawkish repricing.

45 sources ~42 min

0. Weekly Arc

The week started with the post-FOMC communication vacuum deepening — Deutsche Bank notes FOMC member public appearances are at a historical low, a pattern that preceded past policy turning points. Cleveland Fed’s Hammack broke the silence with a concentrated hawkish message, driving front-end yields higher and flattening the curve. The gold selloff extended below $3,950, while the Bloomberg Treasury Index gained 0.7% in June on collapsing inflation expectations. The arc is: hawkish data confirmation → Hammack’s hawkish reinforcement → curve flattening → all eyes on Friday’s NFP as the next clearing event.

1. Policy Narrative & Expectations

The net change over the past ~24h is a reinforcement of the hawkish narrative via concentrated FOMC communication, interrupted by Hammack’s hawkish remarks. The market is pricing a 33.7% probability of a July 25bp hike and a 66.9% combined probability of at least one hike by September (50% single 25bp, 16.9% 50bp) per CME FedWatch [1]. The futures market has fully priced in at least one 2026 rate hike [2][3], with the 2s/10s curve flattening to 26.6bp [4] as the risk focus shifts from labor markets to inflation [5].

1.1 FOMC Officials’ Remarks

  • [NEW] Hawkish — Beth Hammack (Cleveland Fed President): Hammack gave a series of hawkish remarks across multiple venues. Key highlights: inflation is “broad-based” and “still too high,” core inflation is “elevated and not just an energy story,” core services inflation “has been high” [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. She stated she does not see “much policy restraint” in the economy and that if consumer spending “holds up, Fed policy may not be restrictive enough” [8][16]. On the path forward: “We may need higher rates to bring inflation to target” and the Fed “may need to consider rate hikes” [6][7][10][13][15]. But she also expressed a note of caution: “I worry what higher rates could do to the rest of the economy” [17], and said she will “go into Fed meetings with an open mind” [18]. Marginal shift vs prior history: Hammack appears for the first time in today’s briefings, making all her remarks [NEW]. The comprehensive nature of her hawkish delivery — spanning rate-hike necessity, inflation breadth, and policy-restraint skepticism — is the most concentrated hawkish signal from any FOMC official since the June 17 meeting.

  • [NEW] Neutral/swing — Kevin Warsh (Chair, expected later today): Warsh is scheduled to deliver his first international speech at the ECB’s Sintra forum today. Market expectations focus on whether he sheds further light on the rate path or sticks to the minimalist communication style he announced at the June FOMC press conference [19][20][21][22]. Per a Chinese outlet, the market expects him to “focus on inflation assessment and policy communication, possibly hinting at a hawkish stance but avoiding explicit rate-path guidance” [20]. Deutsche Bank notes the post-FOMC communication vacuum — FOMC member speaking appearances are “historically low,” a pattern that in the past preceded policy turning points [23][21].

1.2 Policy Signals & Institutional Communication

  • [NEW] Deutsche Bank: FOMC communication vacuum: Dt. Bank notes that in the two weeks since the June FOMC meeting, FOMC members’ public speaking appearances have been “historically low,” and similar quiet periods in the past (Jul 2019, Jan 2022, Jul 2023) preceded policy turning points [23][21]. Under Warsh, communication style has already shifted: “rewriting the FOMC statement” and avoiding forward guidance [21].

  • [ONGOING] Warsh communication shift: Warsh shortened the policy statement at his first meeting, declined to provide an interest-rate forecast, and signaled a tough line on inflation, while saying he wants to talk less about monetary policy [24][22][2].

  • [ONGOING] Dot plot division: 9 of 18 members expect at least one 2026 rate hike, 9 expect no change or cuts [2]. Deutsche Bank forecasts two 25bp hikes in 2026 (Sep and Dec), moving the fed funds rate to 4.1% [25].

  • [NEW] Morgan Stanley disagrees with dot plot: Morgan Stanley argues the SEP’s suggestion of an additional 50bp of hikes should be “interpreted with caution” because it doesn’t fully capture the disinflationary effects of the Hormuz Strait reopening; they maintain the view of no rate hikes in 2026 [26].

  • [ONGOING] Goldman Sachs: 50% July probability: Goldman’s Lindsey Rosner sees a “likely” July hike at 50% probability, citing wealth effects from stocks and AI-related PCE components [13 from prior history, not in today’s batch].

  • [ONGOING] HSBC maintains underweight USTs: HSBC’s TYCCLES model signals a ‘moderate sell-off’ regime that may persist for about two months, with yields expected to drift 5-10bp higher [27].

  • [ESCALATED] UBS expects NFP miss as catalyst: UBS explicitly expects August (sic) nonfarm payrolls of +80k vs consensus +110k, recommending long 5-year TIPS and a 2s10s curve steepener on expectations that weak payrolls break the momentum of rising front-end real rates [28].

  • [NEW] Bloomberg: Treasury rally in June driven by breakeven collapse: The Bloomberg US Treasury Index gained 0.7% in June through Monday as longer-term yields declined, driven by a collapse in inflation expectations [29][30].

2. Key Data & Market Read

  • [NEW] May core PCE (released 6/25): Annual core PCE rose to 3.41%, the highest since 1992 (excluding the pandemic), with trend inflation (trimmed mean and median) at 3.2% for May [25]. Supercore inflation surged to 50bp MoM [25]. Narrative impact: Confirms persistent inflation pressure beyond energy, supporting the hawkish repricing and Hammack’s “not just an energy story” reading [14].

  • [NEW] Deutsche Bank: Trend inflation data confirms disinflation stalled: Monthly trimmed mean and median estimates rose 6bp to 3.2% in May [25]. Deutsche Bank maintains its baseline of two 25bp hikes (Sep and Dec) [25].

  • [NEW] Employment data expected this week: ADP private payrolls (July 1) and June nonfarm payrolls (July 2) are expected to show slower job creation [3][28]. UBS expects NFP +80k vs consensus +110k [28]. JPMorgan forecasts May JOLTS at 7.4 million (July 1) [4]. Narrative impact: This week’s data is the first live test of the hawkish narrative since the PCE data; a NFP miss (especially below UBS’s 80k expectation) would challenge the “resilient labor market” pillar of the hawkish repricing.

  • [NEW] Narrative — Conference Board expectations: Consumer expectations for higher stock prices one year from now increased [31].

3. Financial-Conditions Signals

  • [NEW] Dollar & rates — yields rise, curve flattens: The 10-year yield rose 4bp to 4.461%, the 2-year added 3bp to around 4.17%, and the 30-year rose 5bp [32][3]. Per JPMorgan, front-end yields rose 1-2bp and the curve flattened 2bp, with the 2s/10s spread at 26.6bp [4]. The flattening reflects a shift in market risk focus from labor markets to inflation [5].

  • [NEW] Dollar & rates — dollar index rose 5% from Feb low: DXY rose 0.2% on the day [3][33]. The dollar’s strength is supported by rate differentials widening in the dollar’s favor [30]. Japan’s MoF has spent an estimated 11.7 trillion yen on FX intervention in 2026, mainly USD-selling/JPY-buying [34].

  • [NEW] Liquidity — Fed reserves: Fed reserve balance fell to ~$2.95 trillion as of June 24, reserves/GDP at 9.5%; SOFR-EFFR spread temporarily widened to 3-6bp on June 12 and 15 due to tax payment peak [2].

  • [NEW] Credit & banking — credit market differentiation: Goldman Sachs notes that high risk-free rates make all-in yields attractive, supporting credit spread tightness [35]. Pension and insurance companies hold at least 40% of outstanding USD corporate bonds, providing deep demand [35]. The USD IG market issued over $1.2 trillion in H1 2026, matching full-year 2022-2023 totals [35]. In USD IG, Goldman prefers BBB over AA/A to capture incremental spread [35]. Private credit baseline is “differentiation not broad disruption” [35].

  • [NEW] Gold — continues to sell off: Spot gold fell below $3,950/oz intraday on June 30, for the first time since early November 2025 [36]. Goldman cut its year-end gold target from $5,400 to $4,900, and said if the Fed hikes, gold could fall to $4,400 [36]. CICC maintains gold’s bull market is not over and expects Fed rate cut timing to surprise to the upside [36].

4. Global Central-Bank Linkages

  • [NEW] ECB — Kocher: next move is hike or hold: ECB Governing Council member Martin Kocher stated the next policy decisions will be “either to hike further or hold steady,” citing improved Middle East stability potentially lowering inflation [37].

  • [NEW] ECB — Goldman Sachs baseline: 25bp hike in Sep: Goldman maintains its baseline 25bp hike at the September ECB meeting, but notes the probability-weighted path is below market pricing, especially for 2027 [38]. Goldman assigns a 40% probability to a second hike, 25% to a third, and 25% to no further hike [38]. The Taylor rule, based on GS forecasts, recommends total tightening of 35bp [38]. ECB staff projections show core HICP peaking around 2.6% and staying above 2% through 2028 [38].

  • [NEW] BOJ — rate raised to 1.0% in June: The BOJ raised its policy rate by 25bp to 1.0% in June, as expected, to address imported inflation from oil prices [2]. Japan’s Ministry of Finance has spent an estimated 11.7 trillion yen on FX intervention this year, mainly selling USD to buy JPY, and each 1 trillion yen of USD-selling intervention typically reduces UST yields 3-4bp [34].

  • [NEW] Global — OMFIF survey: de-dollarization trend: For the first time, more central banks plan to reduce than increase USD allocations over the next decade [39][40]. Record-high proportions of central banks plan to increase gold allocations [39][40]. USD still represents ~58% of central bank reserves but marginal dominance is declining [39].

  • [NEW] Trump reiterates legal pressure on Fed Governor Cook: President Trump suggested that legal pressure on Fed Governor Lisa Cook will continue [3].

5. Asset Implications

This section is inference — no [N]. Anchored to the facts above.

QuadrantCurrent probability tiltKey asset implicationAnchoring narrative
Growth↑ + Inflation↑Risingcommodities↑ TIPS↑ nominal long bonds↓§1.1 (Hammack: “not much policy restraint”, inflation broad-based); §1.2 (Deutsche Bank 2-hike forecast, Goldman 50% July probability); §2 (core PCE at 3.41%, trend inflation at 3.2%, supercore at 50bp MoM); §3 (10-year yield at 4.461%, curve flattening, FCI tightening)
Growth↑ + Inflation↓Fallingstocks↑ long bonds↑ gold↓§1.2 (Morgan Stanley: no hikes, SEP disinflation effects not captured; UBS: NFP miss as catalyst to break real rate rise); §2 (NFP expected to slow, UBS forecasts +80k vs +110k); §3 (Bond fund inflows at record highs per Barclays, pension demand structural); §4 (OMFIF de-dollarization) — Goldilocks narrowing
Growth↓ + Inflation↑Risingcommodities↑ gold↑ stocks↓§1.2 (SEP: GDP 2.2%, core PCE 3.3% — stagflation composition); §2 (trend inflation rising, core PCE at 1992 high ex-pandemic); §3 (yield curve flattening, gold below $3,950); §4 (ECB and BOJ tightening, global liquidity tightening)
Growth↓ + Inflation↓UnchangedLong bonds↑↑ stocks↓ credit spreads↑§1.2 (CICC: gold bull market not over, expects rate cut timing to surprise); §2 (NFP expected to slow); §3 (reserves/GDP at 9.5%, SOFR-EFFR widening on tax payment peak)

Stock-bond correlation call: The regime is inflation-driven, positive correlation, reinforced by Hammack’s concentrated hawkish delivery. The 2-year yield rose 3bp to ~4.17%, the 10-year rose 4bp to 4.461%, and stock futures pointed down [32][19] — both asset classes moving against the hawkish repricing. The curve flattened 2bp with the 2s/10s spread at 26.6bp [4], consistent with the front-end repricing for rate hikes. The JPMorgan Asset Management note that market risk focus has shifted “from labor market to inflation” [5] is the defining narrative: as long as inflation risk dominates, the correlation structure remains positive (stocks and bonds sell off together when hikes are priced in).

However, the critical fragility is the coming data test. UBS’s explicit call for a NFP miss at +80k (vs +110k consensus) [28] is a contrarian bet that if vindicated, would break the correlation structure: bonds would rally on lower rate-hike risk, and stocks would stabilize on lower discount-rates — a shift toward negative correlation. The Barclays analysis that current hike pricing is “more of a risk premium than a genuine expectation of a sustained tightening cycle” [41] supports this “break if NFP misses” thesis.

Risk-budget implication:

  • Underweight nominal long-duration — HSBC’s TYCCLES model shows a ‘moderate sell-off’ regime that is sticky and lasts ~2 months, with yields drifting 5-10bp higher [27]. Deutsche Bank forecasts 10-year at 4.35% by year-end [45 from UBS, not DB]. The Goldman rate strategist forecast is 4.4% by end-2026 [35].
  • Overweight the belly of the curve (5-year sector) — UBS recommends long 5-year TIPS (entry yield 1.899%, target 1.80%) as front-end real yields are at attractive levels [28]. The bond fund flow data shows flows concentrated in short-to-intermediate maturities (0-4yr and 4-6yr corporate bond fund percentiles at 88% and 87%) [41].
  • Overweight a 2s/10s curve steepener per UBS (target spread 40bp) — based on the expectation that weak payrolls break the front-end rate-hike momentum [28].
  • Underweight gold — gold has broken below $3,950, down ~30% from its January high, and Goldman has cut its year-end target to $4,900 with downside to $4,400 if the Fed hikes [36]. However, CICC’s contrarian call that the gold bull market is not over and rate cuts may come sooner than expected [36] makes gold a high-conviction contrarian buy for investors with a 6-12 month horizon.
  • Overweight the USD with dynamic sizing — the dollar is up 5% from its Feb low [33], supported by rate differentials widening in its favor [30]. Japanese FX intervention (11.7 trillion yen YTD) [34] provides occasional headwinds, but BofA’s analysis shows intervention effects are temporary and cannot reverse fundamental trends [34].
  • Overweight USD IG credit selectively — Goldman prefers BBB over AA/A to capture incremental spread [35]; the $1.2 trillion H1 issuance [35] shows the structural demand from pension/insurance reach-for-yield, but supply pressure caps spread compression.

6. Contrarian & Tail Risks

  • Consensus fragility — the “FOMC silence” pre-turning-point pattern: Deutsche Bank highlights that the current period of historically low FOMC member speaking appearances is a pattern that preceded past policy turning points [23][21]. If this pattern holds, the current hawkish regime is fragile and could reverse without warning.

  • Consensus fragility — Barclays: hike pricing is risk premium, not expectation: Barclays argues that the market’s current hike pricing is “more of a risk premium than a genuine expectation of a sustained tightening cycle,” and that if market consensus shifts to believing in sustained hikes, bond fund flows — which are at record highs — could slow significantly [41]. The current $3,200bn YTD bond fund inflow (twice last year’s pace) is the structural support for the bond market; its cessation would be the tail risk.

  • Consensus fragility — the Morgan Stanley disinflation call: Morgan Stanley explicitly argues the SEP’s 50bp hike suggestion should be “interpreted with caution” because it doesn’t capture the Hormuz Strait reopening’s disinflationary effects [26]. If vindicated, the entire rate-hike consensus collapses.

  • Consensus fragility — Warsh’s Sintra speech: Warsh’s first international speech at the ECB’s Sintra forum is today. Per market expectations, he may “hint at hawkish stance but avoid explicit rate path guidance” [20]. If he instead provides explicit rate hike guidance or signals a faster tightening path, it would be a hawkish tail risk. If he signals that the hawkish June FOMC was a one-time communication reset with no operational commitment to hikes, it would be a dovish tail risk.

  • Second-order — de-dollarization structural headwind: The OMFIF survey showing “for the first time, more central banks plan to reduce than increase USD allocations over the next decade” [39][40] represents a structural headwind to the dollar rally. If this trend accelerates, it would cap the dollar’s gains and potentially reverse the tightening of global financial conditions that has supported the hawkish repricing.

  • Second-order — Trump-Cook legal pressure: President Trump’s reiteration of legal pressure on Fed Governor Cook [3] keeps the Fed independence tail risk alive. This could resurface at any time and would be a negative shock to Fed credibility and UST demand.

  • Second-order — AI bond supply and credit differentiation: Morgan Stanley’s credit strategists expect 2026 global AI-related supply of ~$5,700bn, implying $1 trillion in US IG net issuance, which they expect to widen spreads [26]. Goldman Sachs notes that the USD IG market has already issued over $1.2 trillion in H1 2026 [35], creating supply headwinds.

  • Second-order — Super El Niño probability rising: NOAA raised the probability of a Super El Niño in Nov-Jan from 37% to 63%, with Morgan Stanley agricultural strategists preferring sugar as a bullish bet under this scenario [26].

  • Source quality control: Hammack’s remarks [6]-[15] are sourced from a mix of secondary sources (Chinese outlets providing English translations of her comments) and social-media posts (Financial Juice), making them single-source/unverified. The Deutsche Bank communication vacuum analysis [23][21] is primary institutional research. CME FedWatch probabilities [1] are standard market data. UBS’s NFP +80k forecast [28] is primary research. The OMFIF survey [39][40] is a single-source institutional survey. The Bloomberg Treasury Index performance [29] is market data. The “not much policy restraint” quote from Hammack [8] is single-source/unverified (Financial Juice). All Hammack remarks should be treated with standard caution until a full transcript or official statement is released.

Appendix: Additional Sources

  • [42] Bloomberg — Fed funds traders ramp up July hike bets, but market-implied chances remain low
  • [43] 澎湃新闻 — (no specific Fed policy content extracted)
  • [34] BofA Merrill Lynch — G10 FX intervention primer, Japan MoF estimates, SNB policy
  • [40] Financial Juice — OMFIF survey: central banks selling USD, buying gold
  • [29] Bloomberg — US Treasuries rally in June on collapse in inflation expectations
  • [15] Financial Juice — Hammack: inflation still too high
  • [2] 华创证券 — Fed reserve balance, global rate hike wave probability assessment
  • [31] Financial Juice — Conference Board: expectations for higher stock prices increased
  • [30] Daily Chartbook — BlackRock: markets increased expectations for a US rate hike this year
  • [4] J.P. Morgan — UST market technicals and flows, Supreme Court ruling impact
  • [33] 汇丰 — Global risk appetite rotation, US equity fund inflows at one-year high
  • [35] 高盛 — Macro credit outlook: differentiation not broad disruption
  • [38] 高盛 — ECB policy outlook, September hike baseline, probability-weighted path below market
  • [44] Wall Street Journal — Employment data key for Fed rate path
  • [45] 国泰君安期货 — H2 macro outlook, Fed on hold, UST yield range 3.95-4.65%, USD 97.8-102.8

This report is a macro-mechanism analysis, not investment advice.

30-day review of this series 6/18 – 7/18

  • Hawkish FOMC debut and the disinflation counterwave: Chair Warsh’s June meeting—a 9-9 dot-plot tie for 2026 hikes, stripped forward guidance, and sharply higher inflation forecasts—triggered a violent repricing of rate expectations. Over the following weeks, soft June CPI and PPI readings collapsed July hike probability to near 11%, but a wall of Fed speakers (Logan, Jefferson, Schmid) warned against declaring victory, keeping the standoff alive.

  • Labor market softening tests the hawkish consensus: The June payrolls miss of +57k—well below consensus—undermined the “employment overheating” pillar and pushed the first fully priced hike from October to December. Yet the FOMC minutes and subsequent official commentary continued to emphasize inflation persistence, preventing a full dovish pivot.

  • Warsh’s communication overhaul raises volatility: The new chair abolished forward guidance, slashed the FOMC statement to 130 words, and launched five task forces to review communication, balance sheet, and data use. This structural shift made every data release and meeting a “live” event, amplifying market sensitivity to incoming prints.

  • Dollar and rate-path divergence widens: The dollar rallied to a one-year high on the hawkish repricing, then retreated as disinflation data emerged, while BofA’s three-hike forecast stood in stark contrast to market pricing of less than one hike. The gap between institutional forecasts and market pricing remained the widest in the cycle.

  • Global central bank divergence intensifies: The BOJ raised rates to 1.0% and signaled further hikes, the ECB resumed tightening, and the BOE held, while the Fed’s uncertain path created asymmetric cross-currents for EM FX and carry trades, with the yen carry trade reaching 2008-level risk.

Sources45

  1. 美联储7月维持利率不变的概率为66.3% 格隆汇快讯 Score 64
  2. 全球加息潮启动？——全球货币转向跟踪第14期 一瑜中的 Score 69
  3. 美国劳工数据公布前美债收益率上升 格隆汇快讯 Score 62
  4. 美国国债市场日报：最高法院裁决缓解美联储独立性担忧，收益率曲线趋平 外资研报 Score 61
  5. 交易员加码押注美联储7月加息！联邦基金利率期货空头头寸激增 华尔街见闻 Score 69
  6. 格隆汇6月30日｜美联储哈马克：美联储可能需要加息才能将通胀拉回目标区间。 格隆汇快讯 Score 64
  7. 美国连续三个月就业增长的背后，核心支撑并非企业主动扩聘，而是裁员与主动离职人数同步收窄。尽管如此，克利夫兰联储主席哈玛克聚焦通胀风险，声称可能需要加息... 金十-快讯 Score 61
  8. Fed's Hammack: I'm not seeing a lot of policy restraint in the economy. Twitter·财经快讯 Score 62
  9. Fed's Hammack: I see a more broad-based picture of inflation pressure. Twitter·财经快讯 Score 66
  10. Fed's Hammack: We may need higher rates to bring inflation to target. Twitter·财经快讯 Score 67
  11. Fed's Hammack: Core services inflation has been high Twitter·财经快讯 Score 60
  12. Fed's Hammack sees a broad-based story for high inflation Twitter·财经快讯 Score 65
  13. 格隆汇6月30日｜美联储哈玛克：就业市场接近充分就业，增长前景良好。通胀仍然过高，美联储可能需要考虑加息。 格隆汇快讯 Score 64
  14. Fed's Hammack: Core inflation has been elevated; it's not just an energy story Twitter·财经快讯 Score 61
  15. Fed's Hammack: The inflation is still too high, the Fed may need to consider rate hikes Twitter·财经快讯 Score 64
  16. Fed's Hammack: If consumer data holds up, Fed policy may not be restrictive enough Twitter·财经快讯 Score 64
  17. Fed Hammack: I worry what higher rates could do to the rest of the economy Twitter·财经快讯 Score 63
  18. Fed's Hammack: Will go into Fed meetings with an open mind, won't prejudge outcomes. Twitter·财经快讯 Score 62
  19. U.S. Stocks Futures Lower as Rate Hike Expectations Weigh WSJ Score 64
  20. 全球央行大佬今日齐聚论坛，市场焦点集中在沃什首次国际发言，他可能围绕通胀判断、政策沟通方式及是否延续鹰派立场释放线索，但仍可能避免给出明确利率路径指引... 金十-快讯 Score 62
  21. 美联储是否正在保持沉默？ 外资研报 Score 68
  22. Warsh Wants the Fed to Talk Less. That Only Gets Wall Street to Listen Harder. WSJ Score 65
  23. 美联储“不讲话了”！德银：静默期往往伴随政策转折点 华尔街见闻 Score 63
  24. Fed Chairman Kevin Warsh Is Making Some Investors Nervous WSJ Score 60
  25. 趋势通胀：处境不佳 外资研报 Score 64
  26. 跨资产简报：鹰派FOMC会议是否意味着美联储即将加息？2026年6月关键辩论 外资研报 Score 63
  27. 汇丰：TYCCLES模型显示美债进入“温和抛售” regime 外资研报 Score 60
  28. 瑞银全球策略：重新锚定实际收益率走高，关注美债陡 steepener 和 TIPS 外资研报 Score 63
  29. Treasury Market's June Rally Bails Out Quarter and First Half Bloomberg Score 63
  30. "Markets have increased expectations for a U.S. interest rate hike this year, widening interest rate differentials in the dollar's favor." @BlackRock Twitter·宏观市场 Score 66
  31. Conference Board: Expectations for higher stock prices a year from now ticked up. Twitter·财经快讯 Score 63
  32. U.S. Treasury yields edge higher as investors await Fed Chair Warsh's talks in Europe CNBC Score 64
  33. 全球股票策略：风险偏好加速轮动，资金涌入美股，欧洲转向周期性板块 外资研报 Score 60
  34. G10外汇干预入门：聚焦美日瑞政策及美债影响 外资研报 Score 60
  35. 宏观信用观点：分化而非 disruption 外资研报 Score 61
  36. 黄金行情180天大反转：失守4000美元，牛市终结还是中场休息？ 第一财经-资讯 Score 63
  37. ECB's Kocher Says the Next Decisions Will Be Either Hike or Hold Bloomberg Score 61
  38. 欧洲每日：欧洲央行——加息还是按兵不动？ 外资研报 Score 60
  39. OMFIF调查：央行首次计划净减持美元 转向黄金 格隆汇快讯 Score 61
  40. Central banks think the US has become riskier. They plan to sell dollars and buy gold - CNN https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/30/business/central-banks-sell... Twitter·财经快讯 Score 62
  41. 债券基金：买入收益率，而非加息预期 外资研报 Score 64
  42. Traders Boost Fed Funds Shorts in Risky July Rate-Hike Wager Bloomberg Score 65
  43. 7月资金面展望：整体或维持“适度宽松”格局 澎湃新闻 Score 61
  44. June Jobs Numbers: What to Watch This Week WSJ Score 68
  45. [国泰君安期货]2026年下半年海外宏观经济及大类资产展望：旧序余寒，新质去伪存真 内资宏观研究 Score 62