〈Brent Breaches $100 as Houthi Red Sea Strikes Create Dual-Chokepoint Crisis; 13th Night of U.S. Strikes; Iran Rejects Ceasefire; Trump Threatens “Massive Attack”〉
Brent crude surged above $100/bbl for the first time since May as Houthi attacks on two Saudi oil tankers in the Red Sea opened a second front, creating a dual-chokepoint supply crisis alongside the near-total closure of the Strait of Hormuz; the U.S. launched a 13th consecutive night of strikes on Iran, Trump threatened a “massive attack” and said frozen Iranian assets would pay for damages, while Iran rejected a U.S. cease-fire offer and its foreign minister warned of “ensuing chaos.”
0. Weekly Arc
Over the past twelve days the arc vaulted from a shattered June MOU (July 11-12) to Iran re-closing the Strait (July 11-12) and 13 consecutive nights of U.S. strikes widening from coastal targets to infrastructure. The Houthi threat escalated from a July 20 blockade announcement to a July 22-23 attack on two Saudi tankers, making the dual-chokepoint risk a reality. Transit collapsed to a single tanker on July 24. Brent crude surged from ~$83 on July 16 to over $100 on July 23-24. Diplomatic talks remain stalled, with Iran rejecting a U.S. cease-fire and Trump threatening a “massive attack.” The arc is uncontrolled escalation with no de-escalation path.
1. Situation Overview
The past 24 hours mark a qualitative escalation: the dual-chokepoint supply disruption has materially materialized. Houthi rebels attacked two Saudi oil tankers — the Encelia and the Layla — in the Red Sea near the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, causing fires on both vessels and forcing multiple tankers to reverse course [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. The U.S. launched a 13th consecutive night of strikes on Iran, hitting military command centers, drone storage, communication networks, coastal surveillance sites, and maritime capabilities [2][3][4][5][27][7][8]. President Trump threatened a “massive attack” bigger than any seen so far, said Iran has not “received enough pain yet,” and declared that frozen Iranian assets would pay for ship damages [2][3][4][28][27][7][8][14]. Iran rejected a U.S. cease-fire offer, its foreign minister Abbas Araghchi calling Trump’s threat an “incendiary precedent” and warning “ensuing chaos will not be pretty or peaceful” [3][4][28][27][6][7]. Brent crude surged more than 6% to briefly top $100/bbl for the first time since May, settling near $98-100 [3][4][5][28][6][7][8][29][10][30][11][12][14][15][16][17][31][18][19][32][33][34][20][21][22][23][25][26]. U.S. gasoline rose to $4.09/gallon, up 37% since the war began [11][12][35][31][33][34][36][22][37][25]. The net change is a substantial escalation with a dual-chokepoint supply disruption now materialized. [1][2][3][4][5][28][27][6][7][8][29][9][10][30][11][12][13][38][14][15][16][17][31][18][19][32][33][34][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]
2. Key Parties’ Positions
-
[ESCALATED] Negotiation progress: A temporary ceasefire between the US and Iran has failed [4][27][39][40]. Iran rejected a U.S. cease-fire offer on Friday [28][6]. Iraqi Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi visited Tehran on Thursday to call for peace and dialogue, promising not to allow Iraqi territory to be used for attacks on Iran [3][5][8]. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Iran is “not ready to make a deal” [39][40]. The House of Representatives narrowly passed a resolution to halt U.S. military action in Iran, though the Senate voted down a similar measure [7][8][11][14]. No new talks are scheduled and both sides have chosen conflict over negotiations [38].
-
[ESCALATED] US / main pressuring party: President Trump said he is considering a “massive attack” on Iran, bigger than any seen so far, and that Iran has not “received enough pain yet” [2][3][7][14]. Trump threatened to hold Iran responsible for any further Houthi attacks and inflict “major military punishment” on Iran and the Houthis [2][3][4][6][7][8][9][11][12][14][18][32][41][42][23]. Trump declared that any damages to ships and cargo would be paid for by Iranian money held by the U.S. [3][4][28][27][6][7][8]. Secretary of State Marco Rubio described Trump’s approach as “a head for an eye” [2][8][14]. CENTCOM said the 13th night of strikes aimed to degrade Iran’s ability to threaten civilian mariners and commercial vessels [2][4][5][27]. U.S. Central Command stated the Strait of Hormuz remains open for transit with U.S. military support [2]. Senate Majority Leader John Thune said lawmakers are adding Iran sanctions to a Russia sanctions package [43]. The U.S. increased the number of refueling aircraft deployed to Israel and B-1 bombers were observed leaving the UK [31][33][34][36][22]. The House voted to advance a war powers resolution rejecting the Iran war [43][7][8][11]. [2][3][4][5][28][43][27][6][7][8][9][11][12][38][14][31][18][32][33][41][34][42][36][22][23]
-
[ESCALATED] Iran / counterparty: Iran rejected a U.S. cease-fire offer on Friday [28][6]. Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi called Trump’s threat to use frozen Iranian assets an “incendiary precedent,” warning that normalizing confiscation endangers all assets and that “ensuing chaos will not be pretty or peaceful” [3][4][28][27][7]. Iran’s military spokesman said Iran would keep retaliating as long as the U.S. continues to attack its infrastructure and coastal areas [7]. Iran’s Khatam al-Anbia Central Headquarters issued a statement saying that if the U.S. acts on its threat to strike Iran’s infrastructure, Iran will not allow a drop of oil to be exported from the region and will target oil, gas, electricity and economic infrastructure in the region [18]. Iran’s parliamentary speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf warned that if Iran cannot export oil, no one in the region will, and that the Strait of Hormuz would not return to pre-war conditions [44]. The Iranian military said if U.S. military actions continue, Iranian forces will continue to strike U.S. targets in the region [18]. Iran’s health ministry said 55 people have been killed and 629 wounded since renewed U.S. airstrikes began on June 27 [8]. Iran’s IRGC Navy confirmed that the Strait of Hormuz remains closed, with numerous ships awaiting authorization to pass [45]. [3][4][28][27][6][7][8][44][18][45]
-
[ONGOING] Israel: No direct Israeli military action reported in this batch. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu backed the idea of Saudi normalization with Israel as part of the Abraham Accords [43]. Trump said Israel “would join in two minutes if I ask them to” but added “We don’t need anybody.” [14]
3. Military Actions
-
[ESCALATED] US: The U.S. launched a 13th consecutive night of strikes on Iran, targeting military command centers, drone storage facilities, communication networks, coastal surveillance sites, and maritime capabilities [2][3][4][5][27][7][8][11]. Iranian state media reported explosions in Bandar Abbas, Qeshm Island, Andimeshk, Omidiyeh, and Firuzabad [4][27][8]. Four people were killed and five injured in a U.S. missile attack on the outskirts of Ahvaz [3][4][5][27][7][8]. Strikes hit a Revolutionary Guard naval base in northern Iran, Qeshm Island, Isfahan province, Khuzestan province, and Fars province [5][8]. CENTCOM said it has redirected about a dozen commercial vessels and disabled one since the blockade resumed [8]. The U.S. increased the number of refueling aircraft deployed to Israel, and B-1 bombers were observed leaving the UK [31][33][34][36][22]. More than 50,000 U.S. service members are currently deployed across the Middle East [2]. [2][3][4][5][27][7][8][11][31][33][34][36][22]
-
[ESCALATED] Iran: Iran’s Revolutionary Guard claimed to have attacked U.S. military facilities at an American base in Jordan [2][7][11]. Iran launched new strikes on U.S. bases in Kuwait, with Bahrain activating air sirens and explosions reported near a military base hosting U.S. forces in northern Iraq [3][5][7][8]. Iran said it attacked U.S. missile systems, weapons and fuel storage sites in Jordan, as well as U.S. military posts in Kuwait [7]. Jordan’s army said it engaged four Iranian missiles and six drones, intercepting all but one [7]. Iran’s Revolutionary Guards said they struck a U.S. electronic warfare unit at Al-Adiri base in Kuwait, causing unspecified casualties [7]. Iranian state media reported that missiles struck Qeshm Island on the Strait of Hormuz [7]. Iran has intensified its campaign, expanding attacks on commercial shipping, U.S. military bases, and critical infrastructure across Gulf states [38]. [2][3][5][7][8][11][38]
-
[NEW] Proxies (Houthis): Houthi rebels attacked two Saudi oil tankers — the Encelia and the Layla — in the Red Sea with ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, and drones, causing fires on both vessels [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. Saudi state media confirmed the Encelia was attacked and set ablaze [8][11][12][25][46]. UKMTO reported a tanker being struck by an unknown projectile north of the Bab el-Mandeb Strait [8][25]. The Houthis announced a naval blockade on Saudi Arabia centered on the Bab el-Mandeb Strait [3][5][43][7][47][8][29][9][11][12][13][48][15][16][18][19][32][41][42][21][24][26]. The Houthis claimed to have forced 10 other ships to turn back from their passage in the Red Sea [9][13][49][48]. The Houthis sent an email to shipping companies warning them not to load or unload at Saudi ports or face being targeted [16]. Iran had been pressing the Houthis to close the Bab el-Mandeb gateway if the U.S. continued to attack Iranian power infrastructure, and transferred IRGC personnel and equipment to Yemen days before the attacks [7][29][12][14][42]. [1][2][3][4][5][43][6][7][47][8][29][9][10][11][12][13][49][48][38][14][15][16][17][18][19][32][33][41][34][39][40][42][20][36][21][22][23][24][25][26][50][46][51][52]
4. Strait of Hormuz Transit Status
-
[ESCALATED] Control-status change: Iran’s IRGC Navy confirmed that the Strait of Hormuz remains closed, with numerous ships awaiting authorization to pass through [45]. Iran says it has the right to manage traffic and potentially charge fees in the Strait [5][8]. The U.S. states the Strait remains open for transit with military support [2]. Washington insists the Strait is open, but transits have slowed to a trickle amid strikes by both sides on each other’s maritime traffic [16]. The Strait of Hormuz is now, and likely indefinitely will be, under a degree of Iranian control that did not exist prior to the conflict, per The Atlantic [53]. The Houthis threatened to shut down the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, handling around 12% of world trade [5]. [2][3][5][8][53][16][45]
-
[ESCALATED] Transit data: Only one tanker — the New Giant heading for Rizhao, China — transited the Strait of Hormuz on July 24, the lowest since May 7 [3][4][7][27][8]. Strait of Hormuz shipping has fallen to extremely low levels, with no immediate path to de-escalation [1]. In the Bab el-Mandeb Strait on Thursday, 8 tankers traveled north into the Red Sea and 14 traveled south into the Gulf of Aden [3]. Ship traffic through the Strait of Hormuz has slowed considerably [54]. [1][3][4][5][27][7][8][54]
-
[ESCALATED] Shipping / insurance signals: At least five Saudi-linked oil tankers turned back from Bab el-Mandab due to Houthi blockade threats, with an additional tanker destined for China reversing course after leaving Yanbu [16]. Three Saudi-linked oil tankers continued toward Bab el-Mandab despite Houthi warnings, while three others nearby turned off their transmitters [16]. Shipping insurance costs through the southern Red Sea doubled for some companies on Thursday [7]. Mizuho estimates shipping costs could rise from $10-12 to $15-20 a barrel [55]. The turmoil is driving up freight and insurance costs, making it more expensive to move oil and fuel [55]. Lloyd’s List said the Houthi threat “raises questions on the viability of this route” [8]. Saudi Arabia has diverted millions of barrels a day of oil exports to Yanbu via an overland pipeline, but the Houthi attack puts those shipments at risk [5][8]. Lloyd’s List Intelligence said Houthi attacks present a “double whammy” on top of Strait of Hormuz disruption [5][8]. Windward satellite analysis showed two vessels off the Strait of Hormuz likely leaking fuel oil, with oil sheen drifting toward Iran’s Larak and Qeshm Islands [56]. [5][55][7][8][56][16]
5. Asset Implications
| Asset | Direction | Horizon | Driver | Anchoring fact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brent crude | ↑ (surged above $100, first time since May) | intraday / days | 13th night of U.S. strikes; Houthi Red Sea attack materializes dual-chokepoint risk; only 1 tanker transited Hormuz on July 24; Trump threatens “massive attack”; Iran rejects cease-fire; buffer stocks exhausted | Brent >$100 [3][4][5][28][6][7][8][29][10][30][11][12][14][15][16][17][31][18][19][32][33][34][20][21][22][23][25][26]; up ~35% since July 1 [25]; §2, §3, §4 |
| Gold / precious metals | ↑ (haven bid) | days | Geopolitical escalation at highest in weeks; dual-chokepoint risk; Trump threatens massive attack; Iran warns of chaos | No specific gold data; inferred from risk pattern per [2][3][4][5][7][11] |
| Global equities / risk sentiment | ↓ (risk-off; S&P 500 -1%, Dow -1%, Nasdaq -1.8%) | days | Oil surge reignites stagflation fears; S&P 500 fell 74 points, Dow fell 514 points, Nasdaq slumped 1.8% on July 23 [31][11]; FTSE 100 -0.96% [32][41]; Shell +1.4%, BP +2.6% [32][41] | S&P 500 -1% [31][11]; Stoxx 600 and Nikkei effects per §5 |
| USD / haven currencies | ↑ (haven; rate-hike repricing) | days | Oil surge reignites inflation fears; 10Y UST yield jumped to 4.71% [11][31][33][34][36][22][25]; Fed rate hike probability for July 29 rose to 36% from 11% a week ago [31][33][34][36][22][34] | 10Y UST 4.71% [11][31][33][34][36][22][25]; Fed hike 36% [31][33][34][36][22]; §2, §5 |
| Energy / shipping value chain | ↑ (structurally elevated; surging) | weeks / months | Hormuz transit at 1 tanker/day [3][7][8]; Houthi Red Sea attack [1][2][3][4][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][14][16][17][18][20][21][22][23][25][26]; tanker U-turns [16]; shipping insurance doubled [7]; US SPR at 1983 low [57][58][38][59]; European diesel crack at record $79.95/bbl [60]; diesel effectively at $180/bbl [55]; global visible oil inventories at YTD low [61] | 1 tanker July 24 [3][7][8]; double insurance [7]; US SPR 1983 low [57][58]; European diesel crack $79.95 [60]; §3, §4 |
Mechanism read: The oil market has repriced into a $100+ risk-premium regime — up about 35% since July 1 and about 60% since the start of the year [25]. The structural difference from earlier phases is the simultaneous materialization of the dual-chokepoint risk: the Houthi attack on Saudi tankers has turned the Bab el-Mandeb blockade from threat to reality, while the Strait of Hormuz remains near standstill with only 1 tanker transiting on July 24. This means Saudi Arabia’s Yanbu export route — which has been handling ~4-5 million bpd of Saudi crude — is now directly threatened [9][61][26][50]. If both chokepoints are blocked, the only remaining supply route would be pipelines, which Goldman Sachs projects can only insulate about 60% of prewar Gulf exports by end-2028 [30][62][63]. The product market is far tighter than crude alone: European diesel crack spreads surged to a record $79.95/bbl [60], diesel is effectively priced at more than $180/bbl (doubling from ~$93 earlier this year) [55], and US gasoline at $4.09/gallon is up 37% since the war began [11][12][35][31][33][34][36][22][37][25]. Buffer stocks are near exhaustion: US SPR at its lowest since 1983, less than 60 million barrels above its statutory minimum [57][58][38][59]; Cushing crude stocks near “tank bottom” levels [64]; global visible oil inventories at year-to-date lows [61]; the IEA’s 400 million barrel coordinated release is about 70% drawn [57]. Goldman Sachs maintains a base case of Brent at $80/bbl for Q4 2026 but warns prices could exceed $120/bbl if the conflict persists [58][61][54][64]. RBC’s Helima Croft warns oil could challenge the 2008 record of $146/bbl [64].
6. Contrarian & Watch Signals
-
Contrarian & tail risks: The consensus that the conflict remains “escalating but contained” underestimates at least seven structural risks. 1) Dual-chokepoint risk has materialized — the Houthi attack on two Saudi tankers [1][2][3][4][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][14][16][17][18][20][21][22][23][25][26] and the Bab el-Mandeb blockade threaten the Yanbu alternative route; Lloyd’s List calls this a “double whammy” on top of Hormuz disruption [5][8]; any disruption at Bab al-Mandab would threaten one of the few remaining routes for Gulf oil exports to circumvent the Hormuz blockade [16]; a full closure could reduce global oil supply by 7% [12][46]. 2) Buffer depletion is structural, not cyclical — US SPR at 1983 lows [57][58][38][59]; global visible oil inventories at YTD lows [61]; Kpler revised its base case on Hormuz from de-escalation to prolonged crisis [1]; the IEA’s 400 million barrel release is about 70% drawn [57]; further releases will only keep the market supplied for a few months [38]. 3) Trump’s “massive attack” threat risks a spiral — Trump said he is considering a “massive attack” bigger than any seen so far [2][3][7][14]; Iran’s Khatam al-Anbia headquarters warned that if the U.S. strikes Iran’s infrastructure, Iran will not allow a drop of oil to be exported from the region [18]; Mearsheimer warned that striking Iranian power plants and bridges could lead to a global energy disaster [65]. 4) Market complacency is a contrarian signal — investors still see de-escalation as the base case [38][59]; December Brent futures are around $86, well below spot [59]; the S&P 500 has risen about 8% since the war began [59]; Wolfe Research analyst Stephanie Roth said investors may be underappreciating the risk that the conflict persists [38]; Rapidan Energy’s Bob McNally said the optimism bubble among traders could burst, leading to repricing much higher [58]. 5) Iran’s asymmetric leverage is durable — Iran has demonstrated it can hit U.S. targets despite Trump claiming it had wiped out Iranian capabilities [7]; relatively low-cost Iranian missiles and drones have wrought havoc on U.S. bases [53]; the Strait of Hormuz is now, and likely indefinitely will be, under a degree of Iranian control that did not exist before [53]. 6) Pipeline substitution is real but vulnerable — the Saudi East-West pipeline was shut down by a Houthi drone strike in May 2019 [30][62][63]; additional Saudi supplies piped to the Red Sea will also be vulnerable to Houthi attacks [30][62]; the Suez Canal cannot accommodate the largest tankers [30][62][63]. 7) Asia’s frustration with U.S. leadership is rising — ASEAN countries faced higher energy prices, disrupted shipping, and are considering China as an alternative partner [43]; four Washington-based Asian diplomats said their governments are irate that the Trump administration dragged the region into another Middle East war without considering economic fallout [43].
-
Key watch signals: 1) Daily Hormuz transit counts — currently 1 tanker on July 24 [3][7][8]; sustained recovery above 10/day would be a concrete de-escalation signal; further zero days confirm full closure. 2) Brent sustained above $100 (confirms acceleration to crisis, as analysts project $120-150/bbl [58][61][54][37][64]) or below $90 (signals diplomatic reset or demand destruction). 3) Trump’s “massive attack” execution — any actual U.S. strike execution on the scale Trump described would likely trigger Iran’s promised blockade of all regional oil exports [18]. 4) Houthi follow-up action in Bab el-Mandeb — further attacks on Saudi tankers or the Yanbu port itself would confirm the blockade is operational; Kpler analyst Matthew Wright warned Yanbu is “the most active port out of the Middle East gulf at the moment” and any attack would be “a massive blow to continued crude exports from the Middle East” [26]. 5) Ceasefire / diplomatic outcome — Iran rejected a U.S. cease-fire [28][6]; any verified restart of talks would be a de-escalation signal; the House passed a war powers resolution but the Senate blocked it [7][8][11][14]. 6) Fed rate decision July 29 — probability of a rate hike has surged to 36% from 11% a week ago [31][33][34][36][22]; a hike would confirm the oil-inflation nexus is tightening. 7) Kazakhstan CPC output — the Caspian Pipeline Consortium stopped receiving oil after attacks on tankers at the terminal, with Kazakhstan’s biggest field cutting output by more than half; the route handles about 2% of global daily crude supply [29].
-
Source quality control: The Houthi attack on two Saudi tankers is confirmed by Houthi statements [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26], Saudi state media (SPA) confirming the Encelia was attacked and set ablaze [8][11][12][25][46], and UKMTO reporting a projectile strike [8][25] — high confidence. The U.S. 13th night of strikes is confirmed by CENTCOM [2][3][4][5][27][7][8][11] — high confidence. Trump’s “massive attack” threat and use of frozen Iranian assets is from his social media posts and Axios interview [2][3][4][28][27][6][7][8][14] — high confidence as stated intention. Iran’s rejection of a U.S. cease-fire is from NYT [28][6] — high confidence. Brent crude above $100 is cross-confirmed across multiple sources [3][4][5][28][6][7][8][29][10][30][11][12][14][15][16][17][31][18][19][32][33][34][20][21][22][23][25][26] — high confidence. Transit data (1 tanker July 24 from Reuters/ship-tracking) is reputable [3][4][7][27][8] — high confidence. U.S. gasoline at $4.09/gallon is from AAA [11][12][35][31][33][34][36][22][37][25] — high confidence. The claim that Iran transferred IRGC personnel and equipment to Yemen is from Reuters citing sources in Iran and Yemen [7][14] — moderate-high confidence. The Houthi claim of 10 ships forced to turn back [9][13][49][48] cannot be independently confirmed — moderate confidence. The source conflict between CENTCOM stating the Strait remains open [2] and tracking data showing only 1 tanker transited [3][7][8] is notable — the real transit number is clearly far lower than official U.S. statements.
Appendix: Further Reading
- [1] Reuters — Asia LNG prices hit four-month high
- [66] Bloomberg — Gulf states seek financing for Hormuz bypass pipelines
- [57] 华尔街见闻 — Huatai Securities: second blockade worse than first
- [65] 华尔街见闻 — Mearsheimer: US trapped in Iran quagmire
- [43] Politico — ASEAN frustration with US on Hormuz
- [55] Business Insider — Energy shock larger than crude prices suggest
- [53] The Atlantic — US has lost the Iran war
- [30] CBS News — Gulf oil producers accelerate pipeline projects
- [12] USA Today — Houthi Red Sea blockade: 7% of global supply at risk
- [13] The Economist — Houthi maritime embargo
- [58] Business Insider — Oil prices may spike further
- [49] BBC — Houthi attacks threaten global economy
- [38] CNBC — World’s oil buffer shrinking
- [61] 高盛 — Goldman Sachs Brent outlook
- [37] New York Times — War widens, threatens oil supply
- [64] 华尔街见闻 — RBC/Goldman warn of $120-146 oil
- [26] The Independent — Bab el-Mandeb traffic data
- [50] The Independent — Houthi threat widens Iran war
This report is intelligence & mechanism analysis, not investment advice.
30-day review of this series 6/25 – 7/25
-
MOU collapse from fragile truce to all-out confrontation: The June 17 interim ceasefire unraveled within days: Iran’s June 25 attack on a container ship triggered U.S. strikes, and after a brief July 4-6 pause for Khamenei’s funeral, a new cycle of attacks began. Trump declared the deal “over” on July 10, Iran formally suspended its commitments on July 19, and by July 24 both sides were locked in 13 consecutive nights of U.S. bombing and Iranian counterstrikes on Gulf state infrastructure.
-
Dual-chokepoint crisis shifted from threat to reality: The Houthi Red Sea blockade declaration on July 20 initially caused tanker U-turns and shipping diversions. On July 22-23, Houthi missiles struck two Saudi oil tankers, and by July 24 the Bab el-Mandeb was functionally blocked—creating the first simultaneous disruption of both the Strait of Hormuz and the Red Sea alternative route.
-
Strait transit cycled from recovery to total standstill: After post-MOU traffic recovered to 78 ships per day by June 24, the June 25 IRGC attack on a container ship began a downward spiral. Subsequent military exchanges crushed confidence, and by July 24 only a single tanker transited—the lowest point of the entire conflict.
-
Oil prices reversed from pre-war normalization to $100+ crisis regime: Brent fell below its pre-war close of $72.48 on June 25 as supply recovery accelerated. Yet renewed escalation, buffer stock exhaustion, and the materialized dual-chokepoint risk drove Brent to briefly top $100 per barrel on July 24—a $28 rebound driven entirely by geopolitical premium, not fundamental demand.
-
U.S.-Iran military strikes widened in scope and geography: The tit-for-tat exchanges of late June (limited coastal targets) escalated to nightly bombing campaigns by July 13. By July 17-18, U.S. strikes hit bridges, railways, and power infrastructure for the first time, while Iran expanded retaliation to Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, and Oman—attacking desalination plants and oil facilities far beyond the Strait.
Sources66
- Asia LNG hits four-month high on fears of wider Mideast shipping disruption
- Oil prices ease but are set for 10% weekly gain as Trump mulls 'bigger than ever' attack on Iran
- U.S. launches new strikes and Trump threatens 'massive attack' as Iran widens war
- US to use frozen Iranian assets to fund war damages
- US strikes Iran and Bahrain warns of incoming fire as clashes over shipping routes escalate
- Brent Crude Oil Prices Top $100 as Conflict With Iran Drags On
- Trump vows to punish Iran and Houthis for attacks in Red Sea
- US military launches new strikes on Iran as clashes escalate over shipping routes
- War escalates, oil prices surge as Iran-backed Houthis strike Saudi tankers in Red Sea
- Spiraling US-Iran Strikes Sends Oil Skyward
- Strikes Against Saudi Tankers in the Red Sea Send Oil Past $100 a Barrel
- See how oil prices soared after Red Sea attacks and latest US strikes
- World in Brief: Oil prices surge; investors fret over AI spending
- Trump says he is close to decision on largest-yet attack on Iran
- World in Brief: Oil prices surge; Trump says Saudi nuclear deal is subject to recognising Israel
- How the Bab al-Mandab blockade threat helped push oil back above $100
- Oil Hit $100 as a Second Front Opens in Middle East War
- 红海航线告急!两大能源动脉面临同时断流,油价飙升突破100美元
- World in Brief: Oil prices surge as tensions grow in the Middle East; America and Saudi Arabia sign a nuclear deal
- Oil price passes $100 a barrel again as Middle East conflict escalates
- US energy shares gain as Houthi tanker attacks push Brent to $100
- Global oil prices climb close to $100 a barrel amid attacks in Red Sea
- Oil hits $100 for first time since May
- World in Brief: Oil prices surge as tensions grow in the Middle East; America signs a nuclear deal with Saudi Arabia
- Oil prices approach triple digits after Red Sea tanker attacks
- Gate of Tears: How key shipping route Bab al-Mandab became next front in US-Iran war
- US to use frozen Iranian assets to fund war damages
- Brent Crude Oil Prices Top $100 as Conflict With Iran Drags On
- Oil set for weekly rise amid Red Sea shipping attacks, Kazakhstan output cuts
- Middle East oil producers seek Strait of Hormuz alternatives as the U.S.-Iran war escalates
- Global oil prices hit $100 a barrel amid attacks in Red Sea
- Oil prices jump to 100 dollars a barrel after Red Sea shipping attacks
- Global oil prices hit $100 a barrel amid attacks in Red Sea
- Global oil prices hit $100 a barrel amid attacks in Red Sea
- From gas to grocery aisles: How higher oil prices will hit your wallet
- Global oil prices hit $100 a barrel amid attacks in Red Sea
- Global Oil Price Hits $100 a Barrel for First Time Since May
- Running on borrowed time: The world's oil buffer is shrinking as inflation risks build
- Oil prices hit $100 for the first time since May
- Oil prices hit $100 for the first time since May
- Oil prices jump to 100 dollars a barrel after Red Sea shipping attacks
- Trump says Iran will be held responsible for future Houthi attacks
- Asian allies fed up with Washington's war
- World in Brief: Escalating threats over Hormuz; Saudi Arabia and America sign nuclear deal
- IRGC Navy confirmed that the Strait of Hormuz remains closed, and numerous ships are awaiting authorization to pass through - IRIB News.
- Houthi threat to Red Sea risks dragging US into new conflict, experts warn
- The Houthis Have Opened a New Front in the U.S.-Iran War
- Houthi attacks raise fears of wider Middle East conflict and more global economic damage
- Houthi attacks raise fears of wider Middle East conflict and more global economic damage
- A new threat by Yemen's Houthis could widen the Iran war and put another trade chokepoint at risk
- Oil tankers attacked as Iran threatens to turn new trade route into a 'Gate of Tears'
- Global Trade Faces More Shipping Disruptions in the Mideast
- The Mess the Iran War Made
- Brent crude tops $100 a barrel. How the next stop could be $120
- Oil has surged to $100, but the energy shock may be bigger than it looks
- 霍尔木兹海峡附近两艘油轮疑似漏油
- 霍尔木兹二次封锁的杀伤力或许更大?
- Here's how much higher oil prices could go as hopes for an Iran peace deal fade
- Even as War Rages, Investors Bet Oil Will Be Cheaper in a Few Months
- 霍尔木兹之外,红海告急:布油能否再破120美元/桶?
- 红海紧张局势带来新的上行价格风险
- Middle East oil producers seek Strait of Hormuz alternatives as the U.S.-Iran war escalates
- Mideast oil producers step up plans to bypass the Strait of Hormuz
- 布油逼近百元关口!RBC警告:战争进入危险阶段,油价或破2008年146美元历史极值
- 油价破百!米尔斯海默:美国要重演“越南败局”?未来有两种场景
- Gulf States Seen Splurging on Debt to Build New Hormuz Bypasses