Houthi Red Sea Attack Opens Dual-Chokepoint Crisis; Brent Surges Past $96; 12th Night of U.S. Strikes
Houthi rebels attacked two Saudi oil tankers in the Red Sea, turning the Bab el-Mandeb blockade threat into a material reality and creating a dual-chokepoint supply crisis alongside the near-total closure of the Strait of Hormuz; Brent crude surged above $96/bbl, while the U.S. conducted a 12th consecutive night of strikes on Iran and deployed a B-1 bomber; Trump threatened to destroy an Iranian bridge or power plant for every attack on a ship in the Strait, drawing a reciprocal threat from Iran to block all regional oil exports if U.S. infrastructure strikes proceed.
0. Weekly Arc
Over the past 12 days the arc vaulted from a shattered June MOU and Iran re-closing the Strait (July 11-12) to 12 consecutive nights of U.S. strikes widening from southern Iran to western and central areas. The Houthi threat escalated from a July 20 blockade announcement to a July 22-23 attack on Saudi tankers, making the dual-chokepoint risk a reality. Transit collapsed to 3-9 ships/day. Brent crude surged from ~$83 on July 16 to over $96 on July 23. Diplomatic talks remain stalled, with Trump ruling out immediate negotiations and Iran hardening its position, warning the Strait will never return to pre-war conditions.
1. Situation Overview
The past 24 hours mark a qualitative escalation: the dual-chokepoint supply disruption risk has materially materialized. Houthi rebels claimed their first attack on commercial ships in recent months, striking two Saudi oil tankers — the Encelia and the Layla — in the Red Sea near the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, causing fires on both vessels [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. The U.S. conducted a 12th consecutive night of strikes on Iran, hitting locations near Ahvaz, Ramshir, Andimeshk, and Shalamcheh, and deployed a B-1 bomber for the first time since fighting resumed [1][3][5][9]. President Trump threatened to destroy an Iranian bridge or power plant for every attack on a ship in the Strait of Hormuz [10][3][5][11][12][13][14][15]. Iran’s Khatam al-Anbia headquarters warned that if the U.S. acts on its threats, Iran will not allow a single drop of oil to be exported from the region and will target all regional oil, gas, electricity, and economic infrastructure [5][13][14][16]. Iran’s parliament speaker Qalibaf said the Strait of Hormuz will not return to pre-war conditions [10][3][17][18][19][20][21]. Brent crude rose nearly 6% to top $96/bbl — gaining about $12 over the past week — while WTI climbed to $88.45/bbl [22][4][7][23]. U.S. retail gasoline rose to $4.06/gallon, up 36% since the war began [4][23]. The net change is a substantial escalation with a dual-chokepoint supply disruption now partially materialized. [1][2][24][10][3][25][22][4][5][6][9][11][7][12][26][13][27][28][8][17][14][19][21][15][29][30][31][23]
2. Key Parties’ Positions
-
[ONGOING] Negotiation progress: Peace negotiations between the U.S. and Iran have effectively stalled. Trump ruled out immediate talks [32][30] and said the U.S. has “no interest in meeting” until Iran is ready for meaningful talks [15][33][34][30]. Qatari mediators are still talking to U.S., Iranian, and Omani officials to reach a new deal [9]. Iran’s Interior Minister Eskandar Momeni visited Pakistan in recent days seeking to revive diplomacy [3][35][33][30]. Iran’s government spokesperson said “diplomacy isn’t called off” and messages are still being exchanged [3][33][34]. An Iranian lawmaker denied Trump’s claim that Iran is seeking negotiations [30]. Iran accused the U.S. of violating the June 17 temporary ceasefire agreement, which it says is effectively void [30]. [3][32][9][36][15][35][33][34][30][31]
-
[ESCALATED] US / main pressuring party: President Trump threatened on social media that any time Iran shoots at a ship in the Strait of Hormuz, the U.S. will “bomb and destroy ONE BRIDGE OR POWER PLANT,” including those in or near Tehran [10][3][5][37][9][38][11][12][13][14][21][39][40][15][41]. He also threatened to “take care of the Houthis” if they obstruct the Red Sea [11][36]. Trump said Iran is “desperate for a meeting” but the U.S. is not interested [15][30]. The U.S. reimposed a blockade on Iranian ports [3][33][34]. CENTCOM said its 12th night of strikes aimed to “further degrade Iran’s ability to threaten civilian mariners and commercial vessels” [10][3][42][5][11]. The U.S. deployed a B-1 bomber for the first time since fighting resumed 12 days ago [9]. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Iran was not being “serious” about an agreement and that the U.S. remains open to diplomacy [3][12][15][43][30][31][23]. Rubio accused Iran of flying IRGC personnel into Yemen [15][44][45][46][47]. The U.S. has sent more F-16 and F-35 jets to the Middle East [37]. CENTCOM said since early May it has facilitated about 900 vessels carrying 450 million barrels of crude through the Strait — a claim sharply at odds with Kpler data showing only 3 ships passed that day [30]. [10][3][42][5][37][9][38][11][12][13][14][21][39][40][15][43][44][45][41][46][47][33][34][30][31][23]
-
[ESCALATED] Iran / counterparty: Iran’s Khatam al-Anbia Central Headquarters warned that if the U.S. acts on its threats, Iranian armed forces will not allow a single drop of oil to be exported from the region, and all regional oil, gas, electricity, and economic infrastructure will become targets [5][13][14][16]. Iran’s parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf said the situation of the Strait of Hormuz will not return to pre-war conditions and that if Iran cannot export oil, “no one” in the region will [10][3][17][18][19][20][21]. Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi warned of an “eye for an eye” response [10][3][42][11][36]. An anonymous Iranian military source said Iran would strike infrastructure and energy facilities where the U.S. has interests if the U.S. targets a bridge or power plant in Iran [12][15]. Iran’s IRGC said the Strait of Hormuz is completely closed and under its control [5][11][7][48]. Iran warned that repeated U.S. threats will only further expand the war [14][16]. Iran’s Health Ministry said U.S. strikes have killed 53 civilians and wounded nearly 600 since late last month [5][33]. Former Iranian foreign minister Mottaki warned Ukraine against supplying drones to the region, saying Ukrainian military facilities could become targets [15]. [10][3][42][5][37][11][36][7][12][13][17][18][14][16][19][20][21][48][15][33][34][30]
-
[NEW] Proxies (Houthis): The Houthis claimed their first attack on commercial ships in recent months, striking two Saudi oil tankers — the Encelia and the Layla — in the Red Sea with missiles and drones [1][2][24][10][3][4][5][6][11][7][49][27][8]. The Houthis said they are imposing a naval blockade on Saudi Arabia and warned vessels that called at Saudi ports not to transit the Bab el-Mandeb [50][2][51][52][3][5][37][11][53][54][26][35][55][56][57]. Houthi spokesperson Yahya Saree said they would continue naval operations and enforce a “siege for a siege” equation [11][36]. The Houthis claimed they forced approximately 10 ships to retreat [6][36][7]. Houthi-run SABA said six ships in the Red Sea were forced to reroute [35][44][45][46][47]. The Houthis warned that any escalation against Yemen would be met with major operations deep inside Saudi territory [6]. [1][50][2][24][51][52][10][3][4][42][5][37][6][9][11][36][53][7][54][26][49][27][8][35][55][58][44][45][56][57][46][47][30][31]
3. Military Actions
-
[ESCALATED] US: The U.S. conducted a 12th consecutive night of strikes on Iran, hitting locations near Ahvaz, Ramshir, Andimeshk, and Shalamcheh in western Iran [1][10][3][5][7]. CENTCOM said strikes targeted military operations centers, maritime capabilities, aircraft hangars, drone storage, and military logistics infrastructure [9]. Two people were killed in a U.S. missile strike near the Shalamcheh border crossing [3][5]. The U.S. struck a military target near the Bushehr nuclear reactor for the third time in two days [5]. The U.S. deployed a B-1 bomber for the first time since fighting with Iran resumed [9]. The U.S. has reportedly sent more F-16 and F-35 jets to the Middle East [37]. [1][10][3][4][5][37][9][11][7][21][33][34][30]
-
[ESCALATED] Iran: Iran’s military said it targeted U.S. assets in Kuwait, Jordan, and Bahrain [1][3][5][9][11][21]. Iran launched missile and drone attacks on Jordan’s city of Aqaba; Jordan intercepted 4 Iranian missiles and 4 drones [33][34]. Iran struck vital water desalination and energy plants in Kuwait this week [1][10][3][5]. Iran’s IRGC said one of three oil tankers attempting to pass through a “mined route” south of the Strait of Hormuz caught fire after an explosion, prompting the other two to turn back [22][4][5][36][7][48]. Since the war began Feb. 28, Iran has launched more than 30 attacks on commercial vessels [38][39][40][59]. [1][10][3][22][4][5][9][11][36][53][7][21][48][39][40][59][33][34][30]
-
[NEW] Proxies (Houthis): The Houthis claimed they attacked two Saudi oil tankers — the Encelia and the Layla — in the Red Sea with ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, and drones [1][2][10][3][4][5][6][11][7][27][8]. Saudi state media confirmed the Encelia was struck, causing a fire at the bow [1][3][42][5]. UKMTO reported a tanker was struck by an unknown projectile 70 nautical miles southwest of Al Shuqaiq, Saudi Arabia, at 20:00 GMT on July 22, causing a fire but no casualties [3][6][11][36][60][26]. The Houthis said they forced approximately 10 ships to retreat and return [6][36][7]. The Houthis announced a naval blockade on Saudi Arabia, warning vessels that called at Saudi ports not to transit the Bab el-Mandeb [50][2][51][52][3][5][37][11][53][54][26][35][55][58][44][56][57][31]. EU naval force Aspides recommended merchant vessels linked to Israeli, U.S., or Saudi interests avoid transiting the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden until the threat decreases [58][61]. [1][50][2][62][24][51][52][10][3][4][42][5][37][6][9][11][36][53][7][54][26][49][63][27][28][8][35][55][58][61][44][56][57][30][31]
4. Strait of Hormuz Transit Status
-
[ESCALATED] Control-status change: Iran’s IRGC said the Strait of Hormuz is “completely closed” and under its control, warning that no tanker would be allowed to enter or leave without coordination with Iran [5][11][7][48]. Iran’s Khatam al-Anbia headquarters stated the Strait remains closed and vessels must follow designated routes [14][16]. The U.S. CENTCOM insists the Strait remains open for commercial traffic despite Iranian aggression [38][39][40][59]. The U.S. reimposed a blockade on Iranian ports [3][33][34]. The Strait has been fully or partially closed since the war began Feb. 28 [35][45][46][47]. [3][5][38][11][7][14][16][48][39][40][35][45][59][46][47][33][34][30]
-
[ESCALATED] Transit data: Traffic has collapsed to a trickle. Only 3 commercial ships were tracked transiting the Strait on Tuesday, July 21 — two cargo vessels and the Chinese-owned tanker Hsin Ocean [38][39][40][59]. Between July 13 and 19, only 2 ships used the U.S.-backed southern route, both with AIS turned off [38][39][40][59]. Kpler data showed only 9 ships passed through the Strait on Tuesday, down 31% from the previous day [55][64][23]. Weekly tanker transits fell to about 30 in the week to July 19, down from more than 90 the previous week [37]. Deutshe Bank reported average daily westbound exit activity of 7 ships last week, down from 24 during the June 18-July 8 recovery period [53]. CENTCOM claimed it facilitated about 900 vessels carrying 450 million barrels of crude since early May, but Kpler data showed only 3 ships passing on July 23 [30]. [37][38][53][39][40][55][59][30][64][31][23]
-
[ESCALATED] Shipping / insurance signals: Shipping industry insiders say large internationally owned merchant vessels are not transiting the Strait [38][39][40][59]. Marisks CEO Dimitris Maniatis said the U.S. has not been able to ensure safe passage and that crew psychology is “absolutely destroyed” [38][39][40]. South Korea’s Sinokor Group offered mariners six months of extra pay for a return voyage through the Strait [38][39][40][65]. At least 17 commercial mariners have been killed in 61 separate attacks in the Strait since the war began [38][39][40][65]. In the Red Sea, at least 8 tankers altered course away from the Red Sea corridor on Tuesday and Wednesday [37]. Kpler reported 6 vessels reversed course in the Red Sea on Monday and Tuesday [4][21]. Windward data showed at least 5 oil tankers made emergency U-turns [54]. Four tankers loaded with 3.8 million barrels of Saudi crude, diesel, and naphtha turned around before reaching Bab el-Mandeb [57]. EU naval force Aspides recommended certain vessels avoid the Red Sea [58][61]. CMA CGM announced emergency fuel surcharges from August 1 [30][23]. [4][66][37][38][53][54][21][39][40][55][58][61][65][59][57][30][64][31][23]
5. Asset Implications
| Asset | Direction | Horizon | Driver | Anchoring fact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brent crude | ↑ (surged to $96+, up ~$12 in a week, ~30% in July) | intraday / days | 12th night of U.S. strikes; Houthi Red Sea attack materializes dual-chokepoint risk; Strait transit at 3-9 ships/day; Trump threatens infrastructure strikes; Iran threatens to block all regional oil; buffer stocks at historic lows; U.S. gasoline at $4.06, diesel at $5.18 | Brent $96+ [22][4][7][23]; up 30% in July [6][26][67]; $12/week gain [22][4][23]; §2, §3, §4 |
| Gold / precious metals | ↑ (haven bid; gold above $4,100/oz) | days | Geopolitical escalation at highest in weeks; dual-chokepoint risk; Trump threatens nuclear site; Iran threatens regional infrastructure; inflation expectations surging | Gold >$4,100/oz [30]; §2, §5 |
| Global equities / risk sentiment | ↓ (divergent: tech-heavy S&P flat, energy stocks surge, Asia mixed) | days | Oil surge reignites stagflation fears; Fed rate-hike probability rises to ~25% for July; 10Y UST yield rises to 4.68%; Stoxx 600 +0.5%; S&P 500 futures flat; Asia mixed [4][23] | S&P 500 futures flat [4][23]; 10Y UST 4.68% [68][30]; Fed hike ~25% [54][30]; §5 |
| USD / haven currencies | ↑ (haven; rate-hike repricing) | days | Oil surge reignites inflation fears; 1Y inflation swap rate at 4.15%, highest since Jan 2025 [68]; short-term Treasury yields at 17-month high [66]; Fed hike fully priced for Sept [66] | 1Y inflation swap 4.15% [68]; Sep hike fully priced [66]; §2, §5 |
| Energy / shipping value chain | ↑ (structurally elevated; surging) | weeks / months | Strait transit at 3-9 ships/day [38][39][40][55][59][64][23]; Houthi Red Sea attack [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]; tanker U-turns [4][37][54][21][35][58][57]; 61 attacks, 17 killed in Strait since Feb [38][39][40][65]; U.S. refiners at 96% utilization, cracks at record [69][53][43]; SPR at 311mn barrels (1983 low) [69][43]; diesel futures up 26% in July [69] | 3 ships transit July 21 [38][39][40][59]; U.S. crack spread record $70/bundle [43]; SPR 311mn barrels [69][43]; §3, §4 |
Mechanism read: The oil market has repriced into a $95+ risk-premium regime — up about 30% since July 1 and about 33% since the war began [22][4][6][26][67][23]. The structural difference from earlier phases is the simultaneous materialization of the dual-chokepoint risk: the Houthi attack on Saudi tankers has turned the Bab el-Mandeb blockade from threat to reality, while the Strait of Hormuz remains near standstill. This means Saudi Arabia’s Yanbu export route — which has handled ~4.9 million bpd, or ~80% of the kingdom’s crude exports [25][6][53][55][58] — is now directly threatened. If both chokepoints are blocked, the only remaining supply route would be pipelines, which Goldman Sachs projects can only insulate about 60% of prewar Gulf exports by end-2028 [51][52]. The product market is far tighter than crude alone: U.S. 3-2-1 crack spread hit a record $70 per bundle (≈$23/bbl) [43], U.S. refiners are running at 96% utilization with Midwest and Rockies at 100% [69], diesel futures have jumped 26% in July [69], and European diesel prices and U.S. gasoline prices have gained about 65% since the war began vs. 30% for Brent [25]. Buffer stocks are near exhaustion: U.S. SPR at 311 million barrels (1983 low) with operational minimum of 180-200 million [69]; Cushing crude stocks at ~20 million barrels near operating minimum [69][70]; global strategic and commercial reserves “close to nothing” per Energy Aspects [25]. The IEA warns that refinery activity and product supplies have not kept pace with crude deliveries, making refined product markets considerably tighter than crude [29]. Goldman Sachs forecasts $120/bbl by year-end unless Hormuz exports restart [29]; Helima Croft warns a broader regional war could push Brent above its 2008 record of $146/bbl [2].
6. Contrarian & Watch Signals
-
Contrarian & tail risks: The consensus that the conflict remains “escalating but contained” underestimates at least seven structural risks. 1) Dual-chokepoint risk has materialized — the Houthi attack on two Saudi tankers [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] validates the blockade threat; if both Hormuz and Bab el-Mandeb are simultaneously disrupted, up to 24% of global oil supply could be affected [56]; analysts warn “any reduction in oil flows from Yanbu could cause oil prices to rise significantly” [4]. 2) Buffer depletion is structural, not cyclical — U.S. SPR at 1983 lows [69][43], Cushing at operating minimum [69][70], commercial inventories “close to nothing” [25]; Rystad Energy says “where is the flexibility to react to additional escalations?” [69]; the Bank of England warns strategic stock releases “may offer very limited support” [68]; the IEA’s cushioning factors — 400 million barrel emergency release, alternative routes, weak demand — are nearly spent [29]. 3) Trump’s infrastructure threat risks a spiral — Trump threatened to destroy a bridge or power plant for every attack on a ship [10][3][5][11][12][13][14][15]; Iran’s Khatam al-Anbia warned it would retaliate by blocking all regional oil exports and targeting all infrastructure [5][13][14][16]; if executed, this would represent a qualitative escalation beyond anything seen to date. 4) Market complacency is a contrarian signal — S&P 500 futures pointed to “little change” despite oil surging 30% in July [4][23]; high-yield spreads remain tight; stocks in Asia were “little changed” [23]; RBC BlueBay warns “investor optimism on Hormuz was over-optimistic from the start” [68]; HFI Research doubled down on a $150/bbl oil price target [43]. 5) Iran’s asymmetric leverage is durable — shipping executives say “Iran only needs to be ‘disruptive enough’ to keep insurance rates high” [37]; Iran continues to hit vessels despite U.S. air superiority [38][39][40]; Iran has maintained its ability to fire missiles at ships, per experts [37]; the IRGC warned the southern route is mined [7]. 6) Pipeline substitution is real but vulnerable — the Saudi East-West pipeline was shut down by a Houthi drone strike in May 2019 [51][52]; even pipelines far from Iran are not immune to attack [51]; Windward analyst warns of a “pincer movement” against global energy transport [55]; new pipeline construction to bypass Hormuz may take until mid-2027 at earliest [51]. 7) U.S. war costs and munition depletion are structural — Defense Secretary Hegseth estimated $37.5 billion spent so far [3][29]; analysts warn U.S. munition stockpiles are diminishing; a ground operation remains a tail risk [70].
-
Key watch signals: 1) Daily Hormuz transit counts — currently 3-9/day [38][39][40][55][64][23]; sustained recovery above 30/day would be the most concrete de-escalation signal. 2) Brent above $100 (confirms acceleration to crisis, as analysts project $120-150/bbl [43][29]) or below $90 (signals diplomatic reset or demand destruction). 3) Trump’s infrastructure threat execution — any actual U.S. strike on an Iranian bridge or power plant would likely trigger Iran’s promised blockade of all regional oil exports [5][13][14][16]. 4) Houthi follow-up action in Bab el-Mandeb — further attacks on Saudi tankers or the Yanbu port itself would confirm the blockade is operational; EU naval force Aspides has already recommended avoidance [58][61]; Clarksons warned any reduction in Yanbu flows could “cause oil prices to rise significantly” [4]. 5) Ceasefire / diplomatic outcome — Qatari mediators are still talking [9], but Trump ruled out negotiations [32][30]; any verified restart of talks would be a de-escalation signal. 6) IEA/EIA inventory data — U.S. crude stocks rose 2 million barrels last week vs. a 1.1 million draw expected [7]; a sustained build would be a contrarian signal; further decline confirms the supply crunch. 7) U.S. gasoline price trajectory — currently $4.06/gallon, up 36% since war began [4][23]; any sustained move above $4.20 would create acute political pressure ahead of November midterm elections [33].
-
Source quality control: The Houthi attack on two Saudi tankers is confirmed by Houthi statements [1][2][10][3][5][6][7][27][8], Saudi state media (SPA) confirming the Encelia had a fire at the bow [1][3][42][5], and UKMTO reporting a projectile strike on a tanker [3][6][11][36][60][26] — high confidence. The U.S. 12th night of strikes is confirmed by CENTCOM [10][3][42][5][11] and multiple wire services — high confidence. Iran’s closure claim and the mined-route tanker fire is from the IRGC and Iranian state media [22][4][5][11][7]; CENTCOM denied the route is mined [48] — moderate-high confidence as a claimed fact. Trump’s bridge/power-plant threat is from his social media posts and multiple wire services [10][3][5][11][12][13][14][15] — high confidence as stated intention. Iran’s threat to block all regional oil exports is from the Khatam al-Anbia headquarters [5][13][14][16] — high confidence as stated position. Transit data (3 ships July 21 from CBS News/MarineTraffic [38][39][40][59]; 9 ships July 22 from Kpler [55][64][23]; 30 tanker transits in week to July 19 from Braemar [37]) are reputable AIS-based — high confidence. Brent crude above $96 is cross-confirmed across multiple sources [22][4][7][12][29][30][31][23] — high confidence. U.S. gasoline at $4.06/gallon is from AAA [4][23] — high confidence. SPR at 311 million barrels is from the EIA [69][43] — high confidence. The discrepancy between CENTCOM’s claim of 900 vessels and Kpler’s 3 ships [30] is a notable source conflict — the real transit number is clearly far lower than official U.S. statements. The claim of IRGC flights to Yemen by Rubio [15][44][45][46][47] was not supported by evidence per Fox News [44] — treat as an assertion, not a confirmed fact. The Houthi claim of 10 ships forced to retreat [6][36][7] cannot be independently confirmed — moderate confidence.
Appendix: Further Reading
- [51] The Independent — “Pipelines to Bypass Hormuz Accelerating”
- [52] Associated Press — “Gulf Pipeline Acceleration”
- [71] 格隆汇 — “Qatar and UAE LNG Buyers Seek Lower Prices”
- [37] Financial Times — “US Struggles to Reopen Strait Militarily”
- [53] 德意志银行 — “Hormuz Transit Data; Risk Premium”
- [67] Reuters — “Oil Deficit Deepened; Surplus Expected 2027”
- [70] 华泰期货 — “Geopolitical Risk: Need to Guard Against Oil Spike”
- [43] Business Insider — “Warning Oil Could Spike to $150”
- [65] 华尔街见闻 — “Crew Bonuses, AIS Turned Off”
- [56] 虎嗅 — “Dual-Blockade Risk: 24% of Global Oil Supply”
- [30] 华尔街见闻 — “Data Discrepancy; Dual-Blockade Warning”
This report is intelligence & mechanism analysis, not investment advice.
30-day review of this series 9/17 – 10/17
-
Freight and insurance as the durable premium: Early framing centered on barrels lost through Hormuz; over the month the binding constraint migrated from crude volume to the cost of moving it, with record VLCC charters, war-risk cover and shuttle transit persisting even as headline flows recovered.
-
Attack campaign widening and sinking hulls: What began as strikes on tankers inside the strait evolved into a basin-wide campaign — Gulf of Oman, off Qatar, off Fujairah — adding container and bulk tonnage, then actual sinkings and crew deaths, while enforcement hardened from warnings into mined lanes and turn-back orders.
-
Flow measurements splintering: The recovery narrative kept reversing as houses diverged — above-prewar claims, then contested dashboards, then a collapse to 2.9 mb/d single-day prints — before consolidating near 92% of pre-conflict exports, with dark transits making every count a floor rather than a measurement.
-
Diplomacy cycling without landing: A seven-day reopening offer, an on-record rejection, mediated shuttle talks and Gulf ceasefire proposals repeatedly moved prices without producing a signed text, leaving the channel conditionally alive and the strait’s status declaratory.
-
Chokepoints fusing into one front: The Houthis moved from Red Sea coast advances to striking Saudi tankers and airports, tying Bab el-Mandeb to Hormuz and turning the pipeline bypass itself into a target.
-
Cost pass-through reaching politics: The shock shifted into distillates, freight and inflation, transmitting through record diesel, long-dated yields and midterm fuel costs rather than the front-month barrel.
Sources71
- Breakingviews - Oil price safety net is beginning to fray
- Houthi attacks threaten Saudi Arabia's oil lifeline
- Houthis say they attacked 2 Saudi oil tankers in the Red Sea as US carries out 12th night of strikes
- Global Oil Prices Rise as Conflict with Iran Deepens
- Houthis say they attacked Saudi tankers in the Red Sea, threatening new chokepoint in Iran war
- Iran-backed Houthis attack two Saudi Arabian oil tankers
- Oil prices rise to six-week high as US-Iran tensions escalate
- BREAKING: Houthis of Yemen claim they attacked two tankers carrying Saudi oil in the Red Sea. Separately, @UK_MTO just reported a tanker (potentially ...
- U.S. deploys B-1 bomber as attacks on Iran intensify
- Houthis say they attacked 2 Saudi oil tankers in the Red Sea as US carries out 12th night of strikes
- Houthis claim attack on Saudi tankers in Red Sea
- Oil extends gains as Trump threatens strikes on critical Iranian infrastructure
- 美伊互放狠话 布伦特原油突破95美元
- 美威胁袭伊基础设施,伊朗军方:将不允许本地区出口一滴石油
- 特朗普威胁伊朗袭一船就炸一座桥或电厂,伊朗回应遭打击将报复美国利益设施
- 美威胁袭伊基础设施,伊朗军方:将不允许本地区出口一滴石油
- World in Brief: Escalating threats over Hormuz; Saudi Arabia and America sign nuclear deal
- World in Brief: Escalating threats over Hormuz; OpenAI models go rogue
- World in Brief: Trump threatens escalation in Hormuz; OpenAI models go rogue
- World in Brief: Escalating threats over Hormuz; OpenAI models go rogue
- American troops, seriously wounded in recent strikes, were flown to Germany for help.
- Global Oil Prices Rise as Conflict With Iran Deepens
- Global Oil Price Vaults Over $95 a Barrel as War Threats Intensify
- Houthis Open New Front in Iran War By Targeting Ships in Red Sea
- Cutting off Red Sea oil route may be one crisis too many
- 油轮在沙特附近海域遇袭,油价应声走高,此前胡塞武装称“对沙特实施海上禁运”
- Brent Crude Spikes in Late Trading After Red Sea Tanker Attack
- Oil Climbs After Houthis Attack Two Saudi Tankers in the Red Sea
- Oil price hops over $95 mark as Middle East conflict escalates
- 美伊停火希望落空!布油重回95美元关口,地缘风险溢价全面回归
- Oil surges past $95 as U.S. downplays Iran diplomacy and a 2nd key trade route is disrupted
- 特朗普排除立即谈判的可能性,胡塞武装要求船东避免停靠沙特港口。油价月度涨幅逼近30%,并且局势降温的信号尚未出现,出现极端上涨的尾部风险正在增加...
- Iran strikes Jordanian city near Israel as US carries out another wave of strikes
- Iran strikes Jordanian city near Israel as US carries out another wave of strikes
- U.S. and Pakistan condemn Houthi Red Sea threats to shipping and Saudi Arabia
- Houthis claim attack on Saudi tankers in Red Sea
- Military briefing: can the US reopen the Strait of Hormuz by force?
- Shipping insider says "nothing is going through" the Strait of Hormuz, despite U.S. insisting it's open
- Shipping insider says "nothing is going through" the Strait of Hormuz, despite U.S. insisting it's open
- Shipping insider says "nothing is going through" the Strait of Hormuz, despite U.S. insisting it's open
- Trump threatens tit-for-tat strikes on Iranian infrastructure
- Iran war latest: Houthis strike Saudi oil tankers as Tehran warns of retaliation
- Oil is surging again as market pros warn of 'cascading damage' to energy markets
- Rubio accuses Iran of flying IRGC personnel into Yemen as Houthi threat escalates
- U.S. and Pakistan condemn Houthi Red Sea threats to shipping and Saudi Arabia
- U.S. and Pakistan condemn Houthi Red Sea threats to shipping and Saudi Arabia
- U.S. and Pakistan condemn Houthi Red Sea threats to shipping and Saudi Arabia
- 伊朗革命卫队:船只不要使用替代航线进出霍尔木兹海峡
- 胡塞武装宣布使用导弹和无人机袭击两艘沙特油轮,并称将继续执行“以封锁回应封锁”。随着红海航运面临新威胁,中东危机正从波斯湾向另一条能源通道蔓延。点击查...
- What happens if the Red Sea and Strait of Hormuz are blocked?
- Mideast oil producers step up plans to bypass the Strait of Hormuz
- Mideast oil producers step up plans to bypass the Strait of Hormuz
- 海湾航运追踪与全球响应:红海风险升级与霍尔木兹海峡通行量回落
- 六周新高!布油逼近100美元,全球资产是否面临新动荡
- 曼德海峡34%运量蒸发:当沙特的"B计划"延布港也成为靶心
- 曼德海峡告急,全球航运选择再迎重大变化
- Houthis deploy missiles and drones to attack ships in southern Red Sea, naval group says
- Tankers make sharp U-turns after Houthi shipping threat
- Iran War Updates: Oil back near $95 a barrel as U.S. insists Strait of Hormuz is open despite attacks on ships
- 油价延续涨势 此前胡塞武装在红海袭击两艘沙特油轮
- Tankers make sharp U-turns after Houthi shipping threat
- 布油逼近每桶100美元关口 胡塞武装在红海的袭击加剧供应风险
- 美国原油期货涨超1%,油轮首次在红海遇袭
- 霍尔木兹海峡和曼德海峡通航量双双下降
- 重赏之下有勇夫!霍尔木兹海峡风险飙升,航运公司以高额奖金吸引船员冒险通行
- Morning Bid: Can markets handle more strait talk?
- Middle East war deepens 2026 oil deficit outlook, but 2027 glut still looms
- 布油逼近100美元大关,全球债市先“跌”为敬,押注“利率更高更久”
- US oil refineries run at breakneck speeds as wars choke fuel supplies
- [华泰期货]FICC日报:油价地缘溢价明显抬升,关注欧央行政策利率
- 格隆汇7月23日丨消息人士表示,卡塔尔和阿联酋的液化天然气买家因霍尔木兹海峡风险,将寻求更低的价格和更强的供应保障。