Strait of Hormuz Tracker

U.S.-Iran Trade Fifth Round of Strikes; Strait Transit Hits Five-Week Low of 6 Ships; Oil Surges ~4% to $79

The U.S.-Iran standoff escalated further over the weekend with a fifth week of U.S. strikes and expanded Iranian retaliatory attacks on Qatar and the UAE, while Iran declared the Strait closed and the U.S. insisted it remained open; transit fell to 6 vessels on Sunday (five-week low), and Brent crude surged ~4% to $79/bbl, though prices remain far below wartime highs.

78 sources ~41 min

0. Weekly Arc

Over the past week the narrative moved from a fragile diplomatic pause for Khamenei’s funeral (July 4-6) to Iran’s missile attacks on three commercial ships (July 6-7), triggering successive U.S. retaliatory strikes (July 7-12) and Iranian counterstrikes on Gulf states. The arc is sustained escalation under coercive bargaining: both sides have traded five rounds of strikes this week, Iran has re-declared the Strait closed, and mediation efforts (Oman, Pakistan, Qatar) have failed to produce a breakthrough. The stalemate is now entering its third week.

1. Situation Overview

The past 24 hours mark a further intensification of the military cycle. The U.S. launched its fifth round of strikes this week (July 12), hitting dozens of Iranian military targets, including air-defense systems, coastal radar sites, and missile and drone capabilities [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Iran responded with its largest wave of missiles and drones in weeks, targeting U.S. facilities in Bahrain, Kuwait, Jordan, Qatar, and Oman — the first time Qatar (since April) and the UAE (since May) were struck [18][19][2][20][21][4][5][7][8][10][11][14][16][17]. Iran declared the Strait of Hormuz closed “until further notice,” and the Persian Gulf Strait Authority stated passage is currently impossible due to U.S. military movements [22][23][9][15][16][17][24]. The U.S. military and President Trump insisted the waterway remained open and that traffic is flowing [25][2][3][5][6][26][8][27][11][28][12][13][16][29][30][31]. Transit data shows only 6 vessels crossed on Sunday, the lowest in five weeks, and most switched off transponders [22][23][32][33][25][20][3][26][8]. Oil prices surged: Brent crude rose 3–4.7% to around $78–79/bbl, WTI climbed 3–4.8% to ~$74/bbl [1][18][34][25][2][35][4][5][26][36][37][27][38][39][40][11][28]. Gold fell 1.5% to $4,060/oz [25][41][42][26]. Asian equities slumped (KOSPI down 8%, Nikkei down 2%) [18][25][26]. The net change is a military escalation with no diplomatic off-ramp, creating a de facto partial closure that is increasingly contested. [22][43][44][23][45][46][47][48][1][49][18][50][32][33][34][51][52][19][25][2][41][20][53][21][54][3][35][42][4][5][55][6][56][26][57][7][36][8][58][37][59][60][61][9][27][10][62][38][39][63][40][11][28][12][13][14][15][64][16][17][65][24][29][30][31][66]

2. Key Parties’ Positions

3. Military Actions

4. Strait of Hormuz Transit Status

5. Asset Implications

AssetDirectionHorizonDriverAnchoring fact
Brent crude↑ (range-firm, $78-80)daysFifth US strike wave, Iranian retaliatory attacks on multiple Gulf states including Qatar/UAE, Strait transit at 6 ships (five-week low), prolonged closure uncertainty; but prices remain well below $120 wartime highs and near pre-war $72 dampen extreme upsideBrent +4% to $79.59 [1]; Brent +4.2% to $79.18 [41]; Brent +3.89% to $78.97 [37]; §2, §3, §4
Gold / precious metals↓ (haven flows reverse?)daysGold fell 1.5% despite geopolitical escalation, likely due to rising real rates and USD strength; equities sell-off and oil surge may be forcing margin-related liquidationSpot gold -1.5% to $4,060 [25][41][42]; §2, §3, §5
Global equities / risk sentiment↓ (risk-off)daysMajor Asian markets slumped (KOSPI -8%, Nikkei -2%), S&P futures -0.2%, tech weakness; oil surge raises stagflation fears and rate-hike expectationsKOSPI -8% [25]; Nikkei -2% [25]; S&P futures -0.2% [28]; §2, §5
USD / haven currencies↑ (firm, haven demand)daysDollar index at 101.12, USD/JPY 161.96; geopolitical uncertainty drives haven flows; oil surge supports inflation-linked rate expectationsDollar index 101.12 [26]; USD/JPY +0.1% to 161.96 [26]; §5
Energy / shipping value chain↑ (shipping costs up, insurance severe)days/weeksStrait threat level “severe” [11][17]; transit at 6 ships, notional flows near zero; Qatar suspended maritime activities; Iran’s IRGC warns of greater incidents; refining margins elevated6 ships/24h [22][23][32][33][25][20][3][26][8]; JMIC severe [11]; §4

Mechanism read: The oil market is pricing an elevated but not crisis-level risk premium. Brent at $78-79 is a ~$6-7 premium over pre-war $72 but remains far below the $126 April peak. The market appears to be pricing a “controlled escalation” scenario — the U.S. is limiting strikes to military targets, Iran is avoiding attacks on U.S. territory or Israeli sites, and diplomatic channels remain open (Oman, Qatar, Pakistan). However, the physical supply impact is real: transit fell to 6 ships (vs. 138 pre-war), LNG flows have stopped, and the threat level is severe. The product market is tighter: IEA noted the difference between crude and refined product prices hit a four-year high in early July [27], and Europe’s jet fuel stocks are “wafer thin” [33]. The dollar and Treasury yields rose, and gold fell — suggesting that markets are focusing on the stagflationary (oil supply shock) rather than pure safe-haven logic. Goldman Sachs noted that Middle East conflict’s incremental inflation impact likely peaked in Q2; if oil returns to $100/bbl, it would add 3-4 bp per month to core inflation [58]. The market is pricing a 72% probability of a Fed rate hike in September (CME FedWatch) [42]. The key divergence is between the physical shipping crisis (near-halt) and the market’s assessment that full-scale war is avoided.

6. Contrarian & Watch Signals

  • Contrarian & tail risks: The consensus that this escalation remains contained underestimates at least five risks. 1) The MOU is dead, and no new framework exists — Trump declared the ceasefire “over” and the agreement “dead” [23][47][50][21][4][5][7][65]; Iran says diplomacy is “futile” [41][7]; there is no pending talks schedule [17]. Without a diplomatic backstop, the “fight-fight” cycle could persist indefinitely. 2) Iran is expanding its target set — Saturday’s strikes on Qatar (first since April) and the UAE (first since May) mark a notable expansion of range and pace [4][5][7][8][10]; if Iran begins hitting Saudi Arabia or goes after commercial shipping in the Red Sea, the conflict spreads regionally. 3) The Strait closure is asymmetric — Iran says it’s closed, the U.S. says it’s open; but commercial confidence is shattered (6 ships Sunday, LNG freeze, Qatar suspending maritime activity) [22][46][20][16]. The de facto closure is deeper than the de jure status implies. 4) Product market stress is building — European jet fuel stocks are wafer thin [33], the crude-to-product spread hit four-year highs [27], and Russia’s diesel export ban adds supply pressure; any additional refinery disruption could cause retail fuel price spikes that spur political reaction. 5) U.S. election-cycle pressure — the war is unpopular at home, with midterm elections approaching [47]; Trump’s domestic political calculus may push either toward a risky “win” (broader strikes) or toward a sudden diplomatic reset; both are tail events for oil. 6) Israel is a wild card — Israel has proposed participating in U.S. strikes [9][15]; if the U.S. greenlights Israeli involvement, or if Israel acts independently, the conflict escalates to a broader U.S.-Israel-Iran war.

  • Key watch signals: 1) Daily transit counts — current 6/day (Sunday) [22][23][32][33][25][20][3][26][8]; a sustained recovery above 30 signals risk normalization; sustained single digits confirms de facto closure. 2) U.S. strike frequency and scope — the US has now struck five times this week [12][13]; if strikes become daily, that escalates the cycle; a pause would be a de-escalation signal. 3) Brent above $80 (confirms risk premium regime) or below $75 (signals diplomatic resolution or demand destruction). 4) Iran’s interpretation of “Article 5” — the MOU’s vague wording on safe passage is the root cause; any clarification from either side about acceptable routes would be structural [65]. 5) Oman-Iran talks outcome — Omani mediation is the key backchannel; if Iran accepts a dual-lane arrangement, that could de-escalate; if talks are cancelled, the stalemate deepens. 6) CPI and Warsh testimony (July 14) — core inflation data and Fed Chair Warsh’s congressional appearance could strengthen or weaken the oil-to-rate transmission mechanism [18][28]. 7) Iran’s Supreme Leader’s public appearance — the new Supreme Leader has not been seen in public since March; a public address would signal regime confidence or consolidation [17].

  • Source quality control: The mutual strikes are confirmed by multiple primary sources: US Central Command [22][1][50][33][51][25][2][21][3][4][5][6][7][8][37][59][9][27][10][11][28][12][13][14][15][16][17], Iranian state media [43][18][19][2][4][5][6][57][7][8][10][14][16], and major wire services — high confidence. The transit data (6 vessels on Sunday) is from Kpler and cited by multiple outlets [22][23][32][33][25][20][3][26][8] — high confidence for AIS-based data, though “dark” vessels may be undercounted. Iran’s claim of closure vs. U.S. denial is well-documented — both sides’ statements are primary sources [22][23][45][2][41][20][78][3][35][4][5][55][6][26][57][7][8][37][9][27][10][62][38][40][11][28][12][13][67][14][15][16][17][29][30][31] — high confidence as factual positions. The IRGC claim of “stopping two ships” is unverified independently [25][2][3] — single-source, treat as preliminary. Goldman Sachs analysis [58] is a reputable primary source. The claim that Qatar and the UAE were struck for the first time since April/May is based on multiple news reports [4][5][7][8] — high confidence. The unidentified attacker on commercial vessels in the Strait is from US/IRGC statements — high confidence. The observer note that the MOU wording was vague and effectively ceded control to Iran [21][70][64] is expert commentary — moderate confidence as analysis.

Appendix: Further Reading

  • [47] The Independent — Scott Lucas analysis: Iran strengthened, Trump camp in loss
  • [33] ZackEiseman — Europe’s wafer-thin jet fuel stocks; South Africa plans strategic reserve
  • [2] Reuters — Iran Revolutionary Guards target bases in 5 Gulf states, strait closed
  • [7] The Guardian — US launches fifth wave of strikes, Iran says diplomacy futile
  • [58] Goldman Sachs — Middle East conflict inflation impact peaked; $100 oil adds 3-4bp/month to core CPI
  • [70] Seattle Times — Critics: June MOU formalized Iran’s strait control
  • [27] Financial Times — IEA: crude-to-product spread at 4-year high; supply rose 4.1 mb/d in June
  • [38] New York Times — Markets have grown accustomed to volatility; more likely to fall on peace hints
  • [14] Los Angeles Times — Oman summons Iranian ambassador for first time since war began
  • [17] Financial Times — Iran closed strait; talks failed; new regime untested

This report is intelligence & mechanism analysis, not investment advice.

30-day review of this series 6/18 – 7/18
  • The June MOU collapsed from a fragile ceasefire into sustained open conflict within ten days. The agreement, signed on June 17, began fracturing by late June as Iran imposed unilateral permit systems, and by July 10 President Trump declared it “over,” triggering a rapid return to daily U.S. airstrikes and Iranian retaliatory barrages against Gulf states.

  • Strait of Hormuz transit collapsed from a partial recovery to a near-standstill. Traffic had recovered to 40–70 vessels per day in late June as the MOU took effect, but by mid-July the escalation reduced crossings to just 8–13 ships daily — roughly one-tenth of pre-war averages — as shipping companies withdrew capacity and India banned seafarers from Hormuz voyages.

  • The geographic and target scope of the conflict broadened dramatically. The U.S. expanded its strikes from purely military assets to infrastructure targets including bridges, railway stations, and a port control tower, while Iran retaliated by hitting Qatar (a key mediator) for the first time since April and expanding attacks to Syria, Bahrain, Kuwait, and Oman.

  • A dual-chokepoint threat emerged as Iran activated the Houthi vector. Tehran instructed Yemen’s Houthi movement to prepare to close the Bab el-Mandeb Strait if the U.S. struck Iranian power infrastructure, raising the prospect of a simultaneous blockade of both Hormuz and the Red Sea — a tail risk that would leave only vulnerable pipelines as alternative export routes.

  • Emergency buffer stocks were nearly exhausted, stripping the market of its cushion. The IEA warned that the 400 million barrel coordinated release was largely spent, global ex-China inventories hit historic lows, and analysts concluded that “close to nothing” remained in excess inventories — meaning any prolonged disruption would face a structurally weaker safety net than at any prior point in the conflict.

Sources78

  1. U.S.-Iran Latest: Attacks continue over control of Strait of Hormuz as Tehran calls diplomacy "futile" CBS News Score 75
  2. Iran escalates attacks on US bases in Gulf states, warns of more 'incidents' in strait Reuters Score 72
  3. Hormuz traffic slows to multi-week low as renewed US, Iran strikes raise safety risk Reuters Score 69
  4. US launches new attacks on Iran, killing one person, state media reports BBC Score 70
  5. US launches new attacks on Iran, killing one person, state media reports BBC Score 70
  6. US and Iran vie for Strait of Hormuz, waterway key to global energy supplies, in latest attacks Seattle Times Score 70
  7. US launches new wave of strikes against Iran as Tehran says diplomacy has proven 'futile' The Guardian Score 69
  8. US launches new strikes on Iran as Strait of Hormuz tensions escalate USA Today Score 74
  9. 一周三轮互袭,争夺霍尔木兹海峡,美伊“灰色对抗”失控风险增大 华尔街见闻 Score 70
  10. Middle East crisis live: US launches new wave of strikes on Iran; Tehran says attacks render diplomacy 'futile' The Guardian Score 68
  11. Oil prices rise as U.S. and Iran fight for control of Strait of Hormuz CNBC Score 75
  12. US launches another round of strikes on Iran as ceasefire teeters Financial Times Score 68
  13. FirstFT: US launches new strikes on Iran in fight over Strait of Hormuz Financial Times Score 69
  14. U.S. strikes Iran over latest ship attack; Tehran responds by hitting Arab states LA Times Score 68
  15. 国际观察丨一周三轮互袭,美伊“灰色对抗”暗藏风险 澎湃新闻 Score 69
  16. 美军打击百余伊军事目标,海峡通行情况说法不一 澎湃新闻 Score 65
  17. Iran bets Trump will blink first Financial Times Score 71
  18. Treasury yields muted as U.S.-Iran ceasefire strained; investors await core inflation data CNBC Score 67
  19. U.S. and Iran exchange strikes as Strait of Hormuz standoff escalates CNBC Score 69
  20. Iran war: UAE warns public of incoming missile attack as explosions heard in Qatar The Independent Score 70
  21. 新闻蒸馏器|连日多轮互袭,海峡濒临瘫痪,美伊博弈转向重建军事威慑 澎湃新闻 Score 71
  22. Ships stop crossing Strait of Hormuz after US and Iran trade strikes The Independent Score 67
  23. 美伊的"边打边谈",市场还没学会怎么交易 华尔街见闻 Score 68
  24. 伊朗:霍尔木兹海峡目前无法通行 华尔街见闻 Score 65
  25. Oil prices leap and stocks fall amid US-Iran strikes over Hormuz The Guardian Score 73
  26. Oil prices jump after US and Iran escalate strikes in the Middle East The Independent Score 72
  27. Oil prices jump as US and Iran step up tit-for-tat strikes Financial Times Score 76
  28. Stock futures slip after U.S., Iran exchange airstrikes again: Live updates CNBC Score 66
  29. 美国军方:霍尔木兹海峡航运正常通行。 伊朗并不控制霍尔木兹海峡。 华尔街见闻 Score 66
  30. 美军:霍尔木兹海峡航运正常通行,伊朗不控制该水道 格隆汇快讯 Score 68
  31. U.S. military: Strait of Hormuz open to all ships seeking lawful passage through international waters Twitter·财经快讯 Score 66
  32. 市场服务机构:12日仅有6艘船只通过霍尔木兹海峡 格隆汇快讯 Score 65
  33. ICYMI O/N & WEEKEND IRAN: U.S. and Iranian forces exchanged heavy missile and drone assaults, with Tehran targeting U.S. facilities in states across t... Twitter·宏观市场 Score 67
  34. Oil prices jump after weekend US and Iran attacks The Independent Score 75
  35. Morning Bid: Oil swept along on troubled waters Reuters Score 68
  36. Indian shares seen opening lower as fresh Mideast tensions lift oil prices Reuters Score 66
  37. CNBC Daily Open: Mideast tensions on the boil again as U.S., Iran trade strikes CNBC Score 73
  38. Oil Rises After Weekend of Back-and-Forth Strikes by U.S. and Iran NYT Score 77
  39. Oil jumps more than 3% after US, Iran launch strikes in Mideast Reuters Score 70
  40. Oil Jumps as US and Iran Trade Strikes, Dispute Hormuz Bloomberg Score 75
  41. Oil price jumps over 4% and gold slides as the US and Iran trade attacks -business live The Guardian Score 70
  42. Gold slides over 1% as oil surges on Strait of Hormuz closure fears Reuters Score 68
  43. Airstrikes intensify between U.S. and Iran Washington Post Score 68
  44. Media Deals: Great for Bankers, Usually Not for You WSJ Score 68
  45. Iran's trump card Reuters Score 70
  46. Kpler:霍尔木兹海峡已连续三天无LNG船通行 格隆汇快讯 Score 67
  47. I'm an expert on Iran and US politics. Here's what might happen next The Independent Score 71
  48. India Trade Deficit Widens as Hormuz Uncertainty Clouds Outlook Bloomberg Score 65
  49. 霍尔木兹海峡已把地缘风险转化为实际成本,成品油上涨正沿通胀、利率、美元和企业利润率扩散;美联储需要在通胀回落与进一步收紧之间作出条件式选择。 金十-快讯 Score 68
  50. 中东睿评|“停火”后战火不断的海峡:美国霸权的“霍尔木兹时刻” 澎湃新闻 Score 73
  51. Live Updates: Iran Insists It Controls Strait of Hormuz as It Launches New Strikes NYT Score 70
  52. U.S.-Iran Escalation; AI-Related Stocks Slide Across Globe WSJ Score 65
  53. A steady stream of ships have passed through the Strait of Hormuz in secret in recent days, while observable traffic has dwindled, following the resum... Twitter·宏观市场 Score 67
  54. US and Iran Trade Fresh Strikes, Dispute Whether Hormuz Is Open Bloomberg Score 70
  55. World in brief: America and Iran battle over Hormuz; Zelensky reshuffles cabinet The Economist Score 71
  56. Iran war live: Sirens in Bahrain as Iran escalates attacks after more US strikes Reuters Score 68
  57. World in brief: America and Iran battle over Hormuz; Lindsey Graham dies The Economist Score 66
  58. 跟踪中东冲突带来的通胀风险 外资研报 Score 67
  59. Asian Currencies Mostly Weaken Amid Rising Mideast Tensions WSJ Score 66
  60. Oil Prices Rise After U.S. and Iran Exchange New Rounds of Attacks WSJ Score 75
  61. Gold Declines Amid Renewed Strikes in U.S.-Iran Conflict WSJ Score 69
  62. 美伊围绕霍尔木兹海峡的冲突全面升级。伊朗将打击范围扩大至卡塔尔、阿联酋等,并再次宣布关闭海峡;美国则持续空袭伊朗军事目标,特朗普称海峡“仍然开放”。点... 金十-快讯 Score 70
  63. Oil Climbs, US Futures Dip on Fresh Iran Strikes: Markets Wrap Bloomberg Score 73
  64. How Trump Failed to Secure the Strait of Hormuz in His Iran Deal NYT Score 70
  65. Live updates: U.S. conducts another round of strikes on Iran as Trump, supreme leader exchange threats CBS News Score 66
  66. 伊朗军方发言人:霍尔木兹海峡管理权在伊朗,美国强加航线违反备忘录 格隆汇快讯 Score 67
  67. The Guardian view on Trump and Tehran: everyone loses when the US and Iran overplay their hands The Guardian Score 65
  68. [国信期货]宏观周报:国内6月物价相对改善 海外美伊局势再度紧张 内资宏观研究 Score 71
  69. [信达证券]石油加工行业原油周报:美伊战火重燃,油价震荡上涨 内资行研 Score 65
  70. How Trump Failed to Secure the Strait of Hormuz in His Iran Deal Seattle Times Score 70
  71. 格隆汇7月12日|伊朗最高领袖顾问雷扎伊:霍尔木兹海峡是一种战略威慑力量,其重要性甚至超过数十枚原子弹。伊朗将守护这条至关重要的水道。 格隆汇快讯 Score 66
  72. U.S.-Iran Latest: Attacks continue over control of Strait of Hormuz as Tehran calls diplomacy "futile" CBS News Score 75
  73. IRGC forces fire on commercial vessels in Strait of Hormuz: U.S. aircraft down Iranian cruise missile and attack drone, CNN citing U.S. sources Twitter·财经快讯 Score 66
  74. 地缘反复,燃料油再度大涨 格隆汇快讯 Score 70
  75. 中东战火骤燃!美军两度空袭,伊朗闪击美军多处设施并宣布关闭霍尔木兹海峡;乌克兰启动政治战略调整,美联储警告通胀加速……上周五至今,全球都发生了哪些大事... 金十-快讯 Score 66
  76. US, Iran Trade Strikes With Hormuz Status Uncertain Bloomberg Score 68
  77. Iran retains its hold on Hormuz The Economist Score 68
  78. 美伊互袭升级,霍尔木兹陷入前所未有的不确定状态。过去数日通过海峡的多艘大宗商品船只全部关闭应答器。美国称海峡开放,伊朗称关闭,现实是船只正用“消失”规... 金十-快讯 Score 67