Strait of Hormuz Tracker

〈U.S. Strikes / Blockade Escalate; Iran Vows 'Existential War'; Strait Near Halt; Brent Breaches $85〉

The U.S.-Iran conflict has entered a new, more dangerous phase: the U.S. launched a fifth day of strikes — including the first attack on a tanker and expanding the target set north toward Tehran — while Iran retaliated on Kuwait and Jordan and vowed to halt all Middle East energy exports; the interim deal is dead, Strait traffic is near a standstill, and Brent crude held above $85/bbl, but with emergency buffer stocks nearly exhausted, the market faces a structurally weaker cushion than at any point in the war.

60 sources ~45 min

0. Weekly Arc

Over the past six days the arc vaulted from Iran’s July 11 closure declaration and U.S. ultimatum rejection to a full-blown U.S. blockade reinstatement, multiple daily strike waves, Trump’s fee proposal and reversal, Iran attacking UAE tankers, and now the U.S. striking a commercial vessel for the first time since April. The MOU is dead; both sides have hardened rhetoric (Iran: “existential war”, U.S.: “threaten civilian infrastructure”). The crisis is uncontrolled escalation with a diplomatic backstop that no longer exists.

1. Situation Overview

The past 24 hours mark a qualitative escalation: the U.S. struck Iran for a fifth consecutive day, hitting targets further north including areas around Tehran and Semnan province, and for the first time since reimposing the blockade disabled an oil tanker (M/T Belma) heading for Kharg Island by firing Hellfire missiles into its smokestack [1][2][3][4]. The U.S. launched two rounds on Wednesday (a morning strike on Greater Tunb Island and a 7-hour overnight wave) [4][5][6][7]. Iran retaliated with attacks on U.S. bases in Kuwait, Jordan, and Bahrain, claiming to have destroyed command centers and radar sites [8][9][10][3][11]. Iran’s Revolutionary Guard threatened to halt all Middle East energy exports [2][3][12][13][11]. Iran’s government spokesperson reported more than 30 civilians killed and over 260 wounded in recent U.S. strikes [1][5][13]. Brent crude held above $85/bbl — up about 15% from pre-war levels — after briefly topping $86 [1][2][12][11][14][15]. The interim deal is effectively dead [1][16][13][17][11]. The net change is that the conflict has entered a new, more aggressive phase with both sides expanding their target sets and hardening their positions. [18][19][20][21][8][9][1][10][22][23][2][24][3][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][4][33][34][35][36][5][37][12][38][39][40][41][16][42][43][44][13][17][45][11][46][47][48][49][50][14][51][52][6][7][15][53][54][55][56]

2. Key Parties’ Positions

  • [ESCALATED] Negotiation progress: The MOU is dead. Trump declared it “over” last week [48] and the U.S. has reimposed the blockade [3][34][17][11][48]. Trump claimed Wednesday that Iran wants to settle “so badly” and that the U.S. received a call from Tehran as he was traveling to the Army War College, saying they want to meet [4]. Iran’s top negotiator Qalibaf said Iran is in an “essential and existential war” with America and that the only way to reopen the Strait is for the U.S. to comply with the MOU and implement “Iranian regulations” on ship traffic [9][3]. Regional mediators continue efforts but have been unsuccessful [1][13][11]. The IEA warned the solution window is weeks, not months [57]. [9][1][3][57][4][39][16][13][11][48][52][15][53][54]

  • [ESCALATED] US / main pressuring party: President Trump reimposed the naval blockade on Wednesday and claimed the Strait is “open to ALL Ship traffic except for Iran” [43][17][46]. He threatened to strike Iran’s power plants and bridges next week unless negotiations resume [9][5][13][11][6][7], and suggested he may attack a nuclear facility known as “Pickaxe Mountain” [3][35][5]. His 20% fee proposal was jettisoned after resistance from shipping firms and his own administration [39]. Trump claimed Iran made a goodwill gesture by releasing an American detained since 2024 [8][1][2][3]. The Wall Street Journal reported Trump is leaning toward expanding military action, including ground forces to seize Iranian islands near the Strait, but has not made a final decision [32][36][52]. The U.S. military is deploying over 20 warships and hundreds of aircraft [34][46]. Central Command said the strikes target capabilities threatening navigation [51]. [8][9][1][10][2][3][26][27][29][32][4][34][35][36][5][12][39][41][16][43][13][17][45][11][46][48][14][51][52][6][7][15][53][54][55]

  • [ESCALATED] Iran / counterparty: Iran’s army declared the Strait an inviolable “red line” and warned that if Trump attacks Iranian infrastructure, Iran will strike “all remaining infrastructure” across the region — a more severe, wider, and more destructive response [9][1][2][3][12]. The Revolutionary Guard threatened to halt all Middle East energy exports, saying “regional energy exports are either shared by all or denied to all” [2][3][12][13][11]. Iran’s military spokesperson said the only way to reopen the Strait is for the U.S. to comply with the June MOU and implement “Iranian regulations” on ship traffic [9][3]. Iran’s Foreign Ministry warned that if the U.S. violates commitments, Iran will stop implementing the agreement and take countermeasures [5]. Deputy Foreign Minister Gharibabadi stressed Iran will not bow and request negotiations [5]. Iran reported more than 30 civilians killed and over 260 wounded in recent U.S. strikes [1][5][13]. Iran’s UN ambassador called the U.S. the aggressor, not the victim [13][11]. The hard-line newspaper published a list of targets including Trump, Netanyahu, and Starmer [58]. [19][8][58][9][1][10][23][2][3][25][4][5][12][39][41][16][43][13][17][45][11][46][48][49][52][6][7][15][53][55]

  • [ONGOING] Israel: No direct Israeli action reported in this batch. Elements of the Israeli government were accused by U.S. VP Vance of shaping U.S. public opinion on the Iran war [8]. The New York Times reported Israel faces an uneasy limbo as U.S.-Iran hostilities shift focus to reopening the Strait [54].

3. Military Actions

  • [ESCALATED] US: The U.S. launched its fifth consecutive day of attacks on Iran. On Wednesday, the U.S. conducted two rounds: a morning strike on Greater Tunb Island targeting cruise missile storage and launch sites [1][2][3][5][41]; and a seven-hour overnight wave hitting dozens of military targets near the Strait of Hormuz [6][7][55]. On Thursday, U.S. strikes reached areas around Tehran and the provinces of Hamedan, Hormozgan, Khuzestan, Lorestan, Markazi, Sistan and Baluchestan, and Semnan province (home to ballistic missile production and space program) [1][2][3]. The U.S. disabled the Curacao-flagged oil tanker M/T Belma after it ignored warnings and attempted to sail toward Kharg Island — the first time American forces have fired on a commercial vessel since reimposing the blockade [1][10][2][4][5]. Central Command said two other commercial ships were redirected within the first 24 hours of the blockade [4][13]. The U.S. also struck a barracks for Iran’s 388th Mechanized Infantry Brigade in Sistan and Baluchestan with at least 13 missiles, killing seven troops [1][2][13][11]. Two aircraft carrier strike groups and an amphibious assault ship are deployed in the Northern Arabian Sea [34]. [21][8][58][9][1][10][22][2][3][25][26][4][33][34][35][36][5][37][41][16][42][13][11][46][47][49][14][52][6][7][15][55]

  • [ESCALATED] Iran: Iran’s army and Revolutionary Guard retaliated with attacks on U.S. bases in Kuwait, Jordan, and Bahrain. Iran’s army said it targeted the Al Azraq Air Base in Jordan with ballistic missiles [9]. The Revolutionary Guard said it destroyed satellite communications and radar at Ali Al Salem Air Base in Kuwait and a U.S. military pier in Al Shuaiba [9]. Iran’s state broadcaster reported attacks on US targets in Jordan, Kuwait, and Bahrain [10][11][6][7]. Kuwait intercepted attack drones [10][7]. Bahrain activated air raid sirens and intercepted attacks [9][7]. Jordan shot down three incoming Iranian missiles [13][11]. Iran also claimed responsibility for the July 14 attacks on two Emirati supertankers [43]. An IRGC statement claimed that since U.S. strikes began, Iran has attacked seven commercial vessels over the past week according to CENTCOM [4][55]. Iran’s Health Ministry said more than 260 people were wounded in overnight U.S. strikes alone [5][13][11]. [8][58][9][1][10][3][4][35][5][39][42][43][13][11][47][48][49][52][6][7][55][56]

  • [NEW] Proxies (Houthis): Houthi forces attacked Saudi Arabia’s Abha airport this week with missiles after a strike on Sana’a international airport, breaking a four-year truce [58][49][56]. Iran signaled it may use Houthi allies to shut the Bab el-Mandeb strait, opening a new front [9][5][43][49][56]. The Houthis announced a ban on ships linked to Israel from the Red Sea [49]. Maersk and Hapag-Lloyd are resuming some Red Sea routes [49]. Energy sector figures worry the Houthis could target Yanbu port, Saudi Arabia’s alternative export route [5]. Analysts warned that a simultaneous closure of both Hormuz and Bab el-Mandeb is a potential tail risk [47][49].

4. Strait of Hormuz Transit Status

  • [ESCALATED] Control-status change: Iran declared the Strait closed indefinitely on July 12 [58][3][17][56]. The U.S. reimposed its naval blockade of Iranian ports on Wednesday [1][2][3][34][13][17][11][14][7]. The blockade covers vessels going to and from Iranian ports and coastal areas, with U.S. warships authorized to redirect or disable non-compliant vessels [4][34][17]. The U.S. military said it remains vigilant and prepared to ensure full compliance [13]. The IMO council passed a motion last week reaffirming that passage should remain free of any tolls [39]. The threat environment is “severe” [43]. The JMIC raised risk grading to “severe” from “substantial” [43]. Iran’s IRGC warned the Strait will remain shut until the U.S. ends its acts of aggression, and threatened to close other oil and gas export routes [6][7]. The operating environment is increasingly complex and unstable per Kpler [45]. [18][8][58][9][1][2][3][26][27][28][31][4][34][35][5][39][16][43][13][17][45][11][46][48][49][52][6][7][15][53][56]

  • [ESCALATED] Transit data: Traffic has collapsed near standstill. Kpler reported that on July 14, 21 ships transited — all using the northern shipping lanes close to Iran, with no vessels using the Omani route [45]. Recent days have seen no vessels transiting with location transponders switched on [17]. Kpler reported a growing loss of confidence in the southern route, with shipping continuing to favor Iranian-approved routing [45]. On July 15, three additional attacks off Oman were verified, bringing the reported toll to 56 confirmed incidents and 17 seafarer fatalities [45]. Nine Greek-operated LNG tankers remain stuck inside the Gulf due to security concerns [43]. CENTCOM said over 100 vessels coordinated with the U.S. military to pass through the strait in the past seven days, and over 300 passed through the region [43]. Saudi Arabia’s crude oil exports via Red Sea ports rose to about 5 million bpd, compared to the ~7 million bpd previously shipped through Hormuz, while Iraq and Kuwait remain almost completely cut off [47]. [18][1][22][2][24][3][25][27][28][4][35][5][38][40][43][17][45][11][46][47][49][15][56]

  • [ESCALATED] Shipping / insurance signals: Shipping companies are avoiding the US-military guided transit scheme after Iranian attacks [43]. A maritime security firm advised a pause until July 18 due to the high threat environment [43]. MARISKS said there is no assurance that transits can be conducted with an acceptable level of safety [43]. Several LNG carriers remain stranded near the strait [5]. The U.S. military did not provide enough clarity on risks faced by ships on the Omani route, according to five maritime security and shipping sources [43]. Oil traders warn that all emergency buffers have been used up — excess inventory that stood at 400 million barrels before the war is now close to zero, and Western strategic reserves are largely drawn down [47]. The IEA reported that almost three-quarters of the planned 400 million barrel emergency stock release had been released as of July 10 [47]. Energy Aspects’ Amrita Sen said “we have close to nothing” in excess inventories [47]. [20][10][30][31][5][39][40][43][44][45][47][49]

5. Asset Implications

AssetDirectionHorizonDriverAnchoring fact
Brent crude↑ (breached $85, up 15%+ since July)intraday / days / weeksFifth consecutive day of U.S. strikes, U.S. hits tanker for first time, Iran threatens to halt all ME energy exports, Strait traffic near halt, buffer stocks exhausted, but still 25% below $120 April peakBrent >$85 [1][2][12][11][14]; Brent settled $84.93 [12]; WTI ~$80 [25]; up 16% since July [26]; §2, §3, §4
Gold / precious metals↑ (haven bid firm)daysGeopolitical risk at highest level in months; U.S. expanding target set northward; Iran threatening regional infrastructureNo specific gold data, inferred from risk pattern per [9][1][2][13]
Global equities / risk sentiment↓ (risk-off)daysOil surge reinforces stagflation fears; Korea raised rates [8]; India raised fuel export taxes [8]; HSBC raised Indian equities to neutral [8]S. Korea raised rates [8]; India fuel export taxes [8]; §5
USD / haven currencies↑ (haven, rate-hike expectations)daysOil surge raises inflation expectations; IEA warns of global economic risk [57]; IMF forecasts higher inflation [44]IEA warning [57]; IMF 4.7% 2026 inflation forecast [44]; §2, §5
Energy / shipping value chain↑ (shipping costs elevated, insurance unstable, LNG investment surging)weeks / monthsStrait traffic near zero, shuttle-run trade threatened [38], insurance costs resetting with each incident [44], US LNG investment booming [30][31], alternative pipelines accelerating [44][49]Sat images show Saudi loadings slumped [40]; US LNG investment hot [31]; §4, §5; Rhenus: freight +84% [44]

Mechanism read: The oil market has repriced into a pure risk-premium regime that reflects the exhaustion of all buffers. Brent at $85 — 16% above pre-war levels but still 25% below the April peak — prices the following: (1) the complete collapse of the MOU’s diplomatic pillar, (2) the reimposition of the U.S. blockade, (3) Iran’s demonstrated ability to attack ships on both the northern and Omani routes, (4) the structural loss of inventories (400 million bbl excess now close to zero, IEA strategic release nearly spent, U.S. crude stocks at 1984 lows [26][47]). The product market is tighter than crude alone suggests: retail gasoline and diesel prices have risen faster and fallen slower than crude [47], the IEA warned of a potential petrol/diesel supply crunch [47], and European diesel futures rose 14% this week [47]. The IEA’s Birol warned the solution window is weeks, not months [57]. The JPMorgan/El-Erian “contained escalation” view is being tested by the expansion of U.S. strikes to civilian infrastructure (bridges) and the threat to nuclear facilities [32][35][36]. The key structural hedge is accelerating pipeline bypass: Saudi Arabia diverted >70% of crude exports to Yanbu [49]; Kuwait is considering a Saudi pipeline through the Golan Heights [44]; and U.S. LNG investment is booming as buyers diversify away from Hormuz dependence [30][31].

6. Contrarian & Watch Signals

  • Contrarian & tail risks: The consensus that the escalation remains “contained” underestimates at least six structural risks. 1) Buffer depletion is structural — both excess commercial inventories and strategic reserves are nearly exhausted [47]; Energy Aspects says “close to nothing” remains [47]; the IEA warned the window is weeks [57]; any prolonged disruption now lacks the first hedge that softened the March-May shock. 2) Pipeline substitution is real but vulnerable — Saudi Arabia’s Yanbu diversion (5 million bpd) is itself exposed to Houthi attack via Bab el-Mandeb [5][47]; if the Houthis close Bab el-Mandeb, both Hormuz and the Red Sea alternative are shut simultaneously — a tail risk Reuters called “any serious interference” raises the prospect of both routes blocked [47][49]. 3) Trump’s policy instability — the 20% fee was proposed and withdrawn in 24 hours [39]; Trump’s threats to hit civilian infrastructure (bridges, power plants) and nuclear facilities [32][35][36][5] contradict claims of seeking negotiations; and The Economist noted that “nothing is permanent in Trump world” — he could reverse course entirely within a week, creating massive policy uncertainty for markets [15]. 4) Iran’s internal dynamics — the IRGC has been allowed to purge critics inside parliament [39]; the hard-line newspaper published a “kill list” including Trump [58]; the “rogue unit” narrative from U.S. officials suggests internal regime power struggles that could produce unpredictable attacks. 5) IMF warns weaker starting position — IMF analysts warned that after the buffer drawdowns, “the world will start from a weaker position when the next shock comes” [13][11]; global inflation is forecast to rise to 4.7% in 2026 from 4.1% [44]. 6) Reopening the Strait by force is not credible — experts say it would require a much larger armada or tens of thousands of ground troops [13][11]; a military push to clear mines and secure the waterway is a months-long, costly operation.

  • Key watch signals: 1) Daily transit counts — current near zero (21 ships July 14, all on Iranian northern route [45]); a sustained recovery above 30/day — especially on the Omani southern route — would be the most concrete de-escalation signal. 2) Brent above $90 (confirms risk premium acceleration) or below $78 (signals diplomatic reset or demand destruction). 3) U.S. strike escalation to civilian infrastructure — Trump’s threats to hit power plants and bridges next week [9][5][13][11][6][7]; if executed, it’s a major escalation that could trigger Iran’s promised “crushing response” on all Gulf infrastructure [9][1]. 4) Houthi action in Bab el-Mandeb / Yanbu — the Houthis have already fired on Saudi Arabia, breaking the four-year truce [58][49]; any attack on Red Sea crude flows or the Yanbu port itself would confirm a second front [5][47]. 5) Iran’s internal decision on talks — Trump claimed Iran called wanting to meet [4]; any verified restart of negotiations would be a de-escalation signal; continued refusal confirms the hard-line position. 6) EIA inventory data (weekly) — U.S. crude stocks fell 1.7 million barrels last week (less than expected) [25]; a larger draw or sustained drawdown confirms the supply crunch. 7) Insurance / shipping behavior — if shipping companies continue avoiding the U.S. escort scheme [43] and insurance costs remain elevated (refusing multi-week quotes), it confirms a structural loss of confidence.

  • Source quality control: The U.S. expansion of strikes north to Tehran and Semnan is from state media [1][2][3] and U.S. CENTCOM statements [37][51] — high confidence. The U.S. disabling of the tanker M/T Belma is from U.S. CENTCOM [4] and multiple wire services [1][10][2][5] — high confidence. The Iranian retaliation against Kuwait, Jordan, and Bahrain is from Iran’s military [9][10], Gulf state authorities [9][10][11], and major wires — high confidence. The IRGC “halt all energy exports” threat is from official IRGC statements [2][3][12][13][11] — high confidence. The Iran-official death toll of 35+ killed and 260+ wounded is from Iran’s Health Ministry and government spokesperson [1][5][13] — moderate-high confidence (Iranian figures may be incomplete). The transit data (21 ships July 14, all northern route) from Kpler [45] is reputable AIS-based — high confidence. The buffer exhaustion (400 million bbl excess to near zero) is from Energy Aspects [47] and IEA data [47] — high credibility. The Houthi attack on Saudi Abha airport is from Reuters [58][49] — moderate-high confidence. The Lloyd’s/WSJ report of Trump considering ground-force options [32][36][52] is high confidence as official sourcing but unconfirmed as policy. The claim that shipping companies reject U.S. escort [5][43] is from Reuters citing multiple sources — high confidence.

Appendix: Further Reading

  • [20] 格隆汇 — “Saudi Arabia Diverts to Bab el-Mandeb via Yanbu; Pipeline Capacity 7m b/d”
  • [59] 德意志银行 — “Geopolitical Volatility Now Structural; Iran Conflict Resolvable but Hormuz Remains Volatile”
  • [24] Financial Times — “Partial Hormuz Closure Raises Risk of High European Winter Heating Bills”
  • [60] Bloomberg — “Iran Risks Overplaying Hand; Will Lose Strategic Leverage if Hardline Strategy Continues”
  • [26] Financial Times — “Esper: Bombing Cannot Win; Must Strangle Iran’s Economy to Reopen Strait”
  • [44] The New York Times — “Iran War Raises Costs Permanently; IMF Forecasts 4.7% 2026 Inflation”
  • [47] Financial Times — “Oil Traders Warn Emergency Buffers Exhausted; Nearly Half of IEA Stocks Released”
  • [49] Reuters — “Houthi Threat to Red Sea Shipping More Critical Amid Hormuz Disruption; Yanbu at Risk”
  • [56] 国金证券 — “Conflict Intensity May Exceed Market Expectations; Prolonged Reopening Likely”

This report is intelligence & mechanism analysis, not investment advice.

30-day review of this series 6/18 – 7/18
  • The June MOU collapsed from a fragile ceasefire into sustained open conflict within ten days. The agreement, signed on June 17, began fracturing by late June as Iran imposed unilateral permit systems, and by July 10 President Trump declared it “over,” triggering a rapid return to daily U.S. airstrikes and Iranian retaliatory barrages against Gulf states.

  • Strait of Hormuz transit collapsed from a partial recovery to a near-standstill. Traffic had recovered to 40–70 vessels per day in late June as the MOU took effect, but by mid-July the escalation reduced crossings to just 8–13 ships daily — roughly one-tenth of pre-war averages — as shipping companies withdrew capacity and India banned seafarers from Hormuz voyages.

  • The geographic and target scope of the conflict broadened dramatically. The U.S. expanded its strikes from purely military assets to infrastructure targets including bridges, railway stations, and a port control tower, while Iran retaliated by hitting Qatar (a key mediator) for the first time since April and expanding attacks to Syria, Bahrain, Kuwait, and Oman.

  • A dual-chokepoint threat emerged as Iran activated the Houthi vector. Tehran instructed Yemen’s Houthi movement to prepare to close the Bab el-Mandeb Strait if the U.S. struck Iranian power infrastructure, raising the prospect of a simultaneous blockade of both Hormuz and the Red Sea — a tail risk that would leave only vulnerable pipelines as alternative export routes.

  • Emergency buffer stocks were nearly exhausted, stripping the market of its cushion. The IEA warned that the 400 million barrel coordinated release was largely spent, global ex-China inventories hit historic lows, and analysts concluded that “close to nothing” remained in excess inventories — meaning any prolonged disruption would face a structurally weaker safety net than at any prior point in the conflict.

Sources60

  1. U.S. expands strikes into northern Iran and disables ship trying to run blockade NBC News Score 69
  2. US strikes expand into northern Iran as it disables ship trying to run blockade The Independent Score 70
  3. US attacks oil tanker in strait of Hormuz as strikes reported in Tehran The Guardian Score 70
  4. US hits tanker heading for Kharg Island under renewed Iran blockade Financial Times Score 65
  5. 美伊冲突高压,伊朗警告违约必反制、拒绝主动求谈,美军恢复封锁并发动新打击,特朗普剑指镐山核设施 华尔街见闻 Score 67
  6. Iran threatens to block more trade routes as US launches fresh strikes BBC Score 65
  7. Iran threatens to block more trade routes as US launches fresh strikes BBC Score 65
  8. ICYMI O/N IRAN: US President Trump is leaning toward expanding U.S. military operations in Iran after days of briefings from top aides, U.S. officials... Twitter·宏观市场 Score 67
  9. Iran warns Strait of Hormuz is a 'red line' and will resist until the end Reuters Score 65
  10. Iran targets military bases as US launches wave of strikes BBC Score 65
  11. Iran threatens to halt Mideast energy exports after US reimposes a blockade and intensifies strikes Chicago Tribune Score 73
  12. Iran War Latest: U.S. carries out new wave of strikes in escalating battle over Strait of Hormuz CBS News Score 71
  13. U.S. reimposes blockade and steps up strikes as Iran threatens to halt Mideast energy exports LA Times Score 73
  14. Iran War Latest: U.S. launches new wave of strikes in escalating battle over Strait of Hormuz CBS News Score 72
  15. Strait and narrowing: the Iran deal crumbles The Economist Score 68
  16. Trump and Iran signed a truce but still can't agree on what its terms mean Washington Post Score 68
  17. Iran War Latest: U.S. launches new wave of strikes in escalating battle over Strait of Hormuz CBS News Score 66
  18. America's Hormuz brinkmanship is worsening a global fuel crunch The Economist Score 70
  19. World in Brief: America launches fresh strikes on Iran; Ukrainians protest against ministerial sacking The Economist Score 67
  20. 受中东战事影响 沙特转向通过曼德海峡出口原油 格隆汇快讯 Score 66
  21. US Widens Iran Campaign as Hormuz Fallout Grows Bloomberg Score 68
  22. Iran-US Skirmishes Worsen as Hormuz Shipping Traffic Dwindles Bloomberg Score 69
  23. World in Brief: America launches fresh strikes on Iran; SpaceX shares slide The Economist Score 66
  24. Renewed Hormuz tensions raise chances of a pricey winter Financial Times Score 66
  25. Oil prices rise for 4th day as US strikes on Iran raise fears of wider conflict Reuters Score 75
  26. US will not win Iran war from the air, Donald Trump's ex-defence chief warns Financial Times Score 67
  27. Controlling Hormuz Would Take More U.S. Troops -- and Even More Risk WSJ Score 66
  28. 美伊停火破裂后,霍尔木兹海峡再度受阻。此前用于缓冲供应冲击的战略储备和过剩库存已被大量消耗,交易员警告,全球油市正接近“空油箱”状态。点击查看... 金十-快讯 Score 68
  29. Oil Rises Amid Prospects of Escalating Mideast Conflict WSJ Score 70
  30. Iran War Drives New Investment in US LNG, S&P Global Says Bloomberg Score 65
  31. 标普全球:伊朗冲突推动美国液化天然气新增投资 格隆汇快讯 Score 67
  32. 据华尔街日报,特朗普正倾向扩大美国对伊朗的军事行动,但尚未作出最终决定。白宫正在讨论扩大空袭范围、打击核设施以及控制霍尔木兹海峡关键岛屿等高风险方案。... 金十-快讯 Score 66
  33. Oil Holds Gains as Attacks on Ships Near Hormuz Threaten Supply Bloomberg Score 73
  34. U.S. Military Forces Again Blockade Iranian Ports NYT Score 65
  35. EXCLUSIVE: US strikes on Iran strengthen Trump's options for new escalation, officials say Reuters Score 68
  36. 格隆汇7月16日|据华尔街日报:特朗普正考虑扩大对伊朗的军事行动,包括加强空袭、派地面部队控制霍尔木兹海峡附近岛屿及打击核相关设施,但尚未作出最终决定。 格隆汇快讯 Score 65
  37. 格隆汇7月16日|美国中央司令部:美军于美东时间下午3时(北京时间7月16日凌晨3时)对伊朗发动当天第二轮打击行动。此次行动目标是伊朗用于威胁通过霍尔木兹海峡... 格隆汇快讯 Score 65
  38. Iran's Tanker Attacks Squeeze the Hormuz Oil-Shuttling Trade Bloomberg Score 69
  39. Chaos and confusion bring US no closer to resolution on strait of Hormuz The Guardian Score 69
  40. Saudi's Gulf Oil Loads Slump as Iran Hits Supertankers in Hormuz Bloomberg Score 66
  41. U.S. Strikes Hit Greater Tunb Island in Strait of Hormuz NYT Score 66
  42. Trump Vows to Intensify Iran Attacks as Oil Climbs Bloomberg Score 66
  43. Some ships refusing US-military guided Hormuz transits after attacks, sources say Reuters Score 69
  44. War Risk for Businesses Will Mean Higher Prices No Matter What Happens NYT Score 68
  45. Iran War Latest: U.S. launches new wave of strikes in escalating battle over Strait of Hormuz CBS News Score 67
  46. U.S. war against Iran enters a new phase | Analysis Seattle Times Score 67
  47. Oil traders warn market is close to running on empty as Hormuz shuts again Financial Times Score 75
  48. An Iran Agreement Honored Only in the Breach The Atlantic Score 68
  49. Explainer: Why Iranian, Houthi threats to Red Sea shipping matter more for oil now Reuters Score 69
  50. Oil Supertankers Increasingly Bear Brunt in Hormuz Ship Attacks Bloomberg Score 72
  51. US CENTCOM: Strikes aimed to further degrade Iran's ability to attack commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz Twitter·财经快讯 Score 65
  52. Massive escalation or back to talks? The four options Trump has left on Iran The Independent Score 69
  53. The Vague Clause That Helps Explain the U.S.-Iran Fight Over the Strait of Hormuz NYT Score 65
  54. For Israel, the U.S.-Iran Hostilities Have Created an Uneasy Limbo NYT Score 68
  55. US strikes Iran again as blockade ups tensions: Live updates USA Today Score 66
  56. 谁将赢得海峡争夺战?(国金宏观赵宏鹤) 雪涛宏观笔记 Score 68
  57. IEA署长警告若霍尔木兹海峡危机持续 全球经济将再度面临风险 格隆汇快讯 Score 67
  58. 重启的美国伊朗战火和再上涨的国际石油价格 虎嗅 Score 70
  59. 2026年中地缘政治剧本:波动成为新常态,关注海湾、东盟及俄乌停战机遇 外资研报 Score 67
  60. Iran Risks Overplaying Its Hand on Hormuz Bloomberg Score 67