sembr.live
中

Fed Watch

Payrolls surprise flips September hike odds back toward 60%; Trump pressures cuts into the quiet period

Friday's August payrolls report — far above consensus, with unemployment steady and prior months revised up — reversed Wednesday's Waller-driven cooling and lifted September hike odds to roughly 58–65%, making next week's CPI the sole arbiter even as President Trump publicly demanded cuts .

67 sources ~40 min

0. Weekly Arc

From Warsh’s Jackson Hole keynote through Hammack’s district-level hawk notes, the committee’s center of gravity has swung between hike and hold within one week. Waller’s conditional-hold remarks and Williams’ disinflation commentary pulled September odds to roughly a coin flip and eased yields midweek; Friday’s upside payrolls surprise erased that relief, putting a September hike back near a 60% baseline. The “labor market too weak to hike” objection is gone, so the August CPI now decides — against a backdrop of renewed White House pressure for cuts and an open FOMC “family fight.”

1. Policy Narrative & Expectations

The net change over the past ~24h is a hard reversal of Wednesday’s dovish relief: the payrolls report — roughly three times economists’ forecasts and the second-highest monthly gain of the year — pushed September hike pricing back to roughly 58–65% ([1] Reuters ~62%; [2][3][4] CME FedWatch 58% from 49.4%; [5] ~65%) and sent the 2Y yield to an intraday high last seen in January 2025 [3]. Officials had uniformly signaled that inflation data, not jobs, would decide the September 15–16 meeting [1][6]; the jobs strength removed the labor-market objection to a hike — per Timiraos, the “solid August employment data… removes an obstacle to a rate increase” [7][8] — while wage growth stayed in line and below current inflation, keeping the labor market outside the inflation problem [9][10][11]. The committee split remains wide: Hammack is newly hawkish, Waller and Williams lean toward a conditional hold, and Warsh — whose Jackson Hole frame anchors the debate — gives no fresh signal; house calls now span two-hike baselines (UBS, BofA, Nationwide), a September hold with cuts deferred to 2027 (Citi), and a hold-through-September consensus (Morgan Stanley, Nomura) [12][13][10][14][15].

1.1 FOMC Officials’ Remarks

  • [NEW] Hawkish: Cleveland Fed President Beth Hammack — her 9/4 remarks mark the only fresh official commentary of the window: policy is “not restrictive,” inflation remains above 3% with the labor market near maximum employment, and Fourth District businesses report double-digit input-cost increases and “say it is time to act” [16][17]. The Financial Juice social relays of the same remarks are single-source / unverified [18][19].
  • [ONGOING] Chair Kevin Warsh (listed separately): no fresh remarks in the past 24h; the Jackson Hole anchor stands — the 2% PCE target is fixed and there is “work to do” unless underlying inflation clearly and quickly moves toward target [20][12][1][21]. BofA projects that if data come in as expected he would support 25bp hikes in September, October and December [13]; Deutsche Bank, conversely, reads his reaction function as dovish relative to his own upbeat economic assessment [22].
  • [ONGOING] Neutral/swing: Governor Christopher Waller — leaning toward holding rates at 3.50%–3.75% if next week’s CPI and PPI show continuing moderation, but a “hot” BLS inflation report “would compel him to support a rate increase” [23][1]; Friday’s blockbuster jobs report directly undercut his 9/3 hold tilt [3].
  • [ONGOING] Dovish: New York Fed President John Williams — inflation is continuing to come down as tariff effects fade, energy increases have not spread into other services, and expectations remain anchored [24][14]; Deutsche Bank flags that he “may support a near-term hike” if inflation does not clearly return to target — a swing risk to the dovish read [25].

1.2 Policy Signals & Institutional Communication

  • [NEW] Political pressure re-escalates: President Trump posted on Truth Social (9/4) that the US should have the world’s lowest rates “like the good old days,” urged the Fed Board under its “excellent new leader” to “act… as an American patriot this time,” and threatened to halt trade with US-trade-surplus countries unless the Fed cuts [20][26][27]; the NYT notes the demand risks undermining the Fed’s independent inflation fight [23][9]. Vice President Vance again called for cuts [20], while NEC Director Hassett said the administration respects Fed independence but the case for holding is “fairly strong” — openly conflicting guidance from inside the administration [20][28].
  • [NEW] Decision mechanics: per Timiraos, the strong report cleared the key obstacle to a September hike, but the August CPI (9/11) remains the decisive input for whether the Fed actually acts [8][7]; CPI and PPI (9/10) are the last data checkpoints before the FOMC, and next week falls inside the pre-meeting quiet period [3][4][13].
  • [NEW] Street calls widen into a genuine delivery debate: UBS flipped to two 2026 hikes (September and December, year-end 4.00%–4.25%) with no easing before at least June 2027 [29][12]; BofA expects hikes in September, October and December to 4.25%–4.50% [13]; Nationwide now expects two hikes by year-end [1]; JPMorgan keeps December as base case with September “also possible” [30]; Citi expects a September 16 hold and pushes the first cut to June 2027, arguing the market’s >50% hike pricing is “very unlikely to materialize” [10][31]; Morgan Stanley and Nomura hold their September-hold baselines [14][15]; Goldman expects the Fed to stop hiking [32].
  • [ONGOING] Public “family fight”: the Warsh-hawkish vs Waller/Williams-dovish split remains open and is itself a source of pricing volatility [33][34].

2. Key Data & Market Read

  • [NEW] August nonfarm payrolls (released 9/4): far above consensus — roughly three times economists’ forecasts and the second-highest monthly gain of the year — with the unemployment rate steady and June/July revised higher (July turning positive) [35][36][27][37][8]. Market read: the labor-market cooling narrative lost its footing [38]; sector detail shows an emerging “AI substitution effect,” with finance and information jobs down while data-center-related construction, manufacturing and utilities gained [35][36][38].
  • [NEW] Wage and quality read: average hourly earnings rose in line, with the 3.1% y/y pace below current inflation — Oxford Economics says “the Fed can be reassured” that labor is not an inflation source [10][11][9]; Allianz counters that nominal wage growth near an annual low implies negative real wage growth, complicating a hike [39]. UBS cautions a special 4-week/5-week calendar effect biased the August seasonal adjustment upward [12].
  • [NEW] Narrative impact: the report sharpened the Fed’s jobs-inflation tradeoff and did the opposite of what the White House wanted — it strengthened, not weakened, the case for a hike [37][40][36]; analysts uniformly note the FOMC has signaled inflation data will determine the next step, putting the September-11 CPI at the center of the decision [1][41][3][8].

3. Financial-Conditions Signals

  • [REVERSED] Rates: Friday’s Treasury selloff reversed Wednesday’s Waller-driven easing — the 2Y rose 3.4bp to ~4.37% (intraday 4.416%, the highest since January 2025), the 10Y +2.2bp to ~4.78% (touching ~4.8%), the 30Y +0.3bp to ~5.25%, with 2s10s flattening to ~40.6bp [35][36][3][42]. The front end is again the driver of the curve, with the long end ending the whipsaw week near where it began [43][44].
  • [NEW] Liquidity & market functioning: JPMorgan flags clearly deteriorated liquidity in cash Treasuries while equity-index futures and corporate-bond ETFs show no comparable stress [35][45][36]; the global composite bond yield has risen to above 4.1% [45]. The Treasury’s first enlarged long-end liquidity buyback (10–20Y) is scheduled for announcement 9/9, with the market expecting per-operation size of at least $4bn — support JPMorgan argues is already over-priced [29][46][47].
  • [NEW] Credit & banking: the Treasury selloff has not yet spread to risk assets — credit spreads remain unusually tight, financing costs are not yet an obvious burden with earnings up over 20% y/y [35][36], bank loan growth is steady above 7% y/y with investment-grade net issuance rising [45][38], while CCC spreads have widened as BB/B spreads narrowed — an early two-tier signal [38].
  • [NEW] Dollar & yen: after the payrolls print the dollar firmed — DXY +0.27% to ~99.18 and USD/JPY back to ~156.2–156.5 — partially reversing Thursday’s ~2% yen surge driven by BOJ-hike bets and intervention speculation [3][48][24].
  • [REVERSED] Gold: broke below $4,400/oz intraday (down more than 2% at the low) before recovering most of the loss to close down ~1% near $4,429 as yields eased off their highs [3][48].
  • [NEW] Long-end structural drivers: foreign official UST holdings have fallen from ~31% in 2016 to ~12%, with officials net sellers since 2024, leaving Treasury clearing more reliant on price-sensitive private demand [49]; heavy AI-related duration supply competes for the same capital — UBS estimates $210–220bn of September IG issuance and attributes 15–20bp of this year’s 10Y/30Y move to duration supply [29]; Vanguard counts $135bn of debt issued by five major tech firms this year versus a ~$35bn 2020–24 average [42]; Norway’s sovereign wealth fund has proposed cutting UST holdings by roughly $75bn, largely into MBS [43][3].

4. Global Central-Bank Linkages

  • [ESCALATED] ECB: a 25bp hike next week (9/10) is ~99% priced [50], taking the deposit rate to 2.5% [51][33]; divergence on follow-through — JPMorgan adds a December hike to 2.75% [52], while BofA and Goldman see September as likely the last move of the cycle [53][32]; August headline HICP accelerated to 3.3% y/y (energy-led) but core eased to 2.4%, and Deutsche Bank notes the downside core surprise leaves the path uncertain [33][22].
  • [ESCALATED] BOJ: a September 18 hike is ~98% priced [50]; Barclays expects hikes in September, January and July 2027 [33] and JPMorgan expects September plus December to a 1.5% policy rate by year-end [52]; JGB 20Y/30Y yields fell ~10bp on global policy-path repricing [48], Deutsche Bank sees stress shifting to the 10-year (JSCC-LCH clearing basis) as offshore accounts hedge BOJ risk [22][54], and August’s record ~¥15.4tn intervention was not funded via the Fed’s FIMA facility — avoiding outright UST-selling fears [55].
  • [ONGOING] PBoC / China: the 9/4 USD/CNY fixing at 6.7787 — below 6.78 — signals officials are allowing the yuan to appreciate moderately [15]; the PBOC is expected to step up outright reverse-repo net injections, with a Q3 RRR/cut possible if conditions warrant [56].
  • [NEW] Others: UK front-end pricing has been sharply repriced by the Fed’s hawkish guidance — intermediate forwards now imply a BoE neutral rate near 4.5%, above survey estimates [47], with BofA expecting the BoE on hold through 2026 [53]; RBA September-hike bets are firming on strong July CPI and Q2 GDP [57][15][42]; the Bank of Canada held at 2.25% with Macklem stressing ~3% headline-inflation risk [58].

5. Asset Implications

This section is inference — anchored to the facts above.

QuadrantCurrent probability tiltKey asset implicationAnchoring narrative
Growth↑ + Inflation↑RisingStrong payrolls, ~$96 Brent, sticky supercore and 54% PCE breadth keep commodities/energy and TIPS as the cleaner expressions; long nominal bonds stay blocked by real-rate/term-premium repricing§2 / §3
Growth↑ + Inflation↓FallingThe disinflation-with-resilient-growth path (Waller/Williams, Citi, Morgan Stanley) supports front-end/belly carry and equities, but ~60% hike pricing caps beta; Friday’s equity dip was absorbed and weekly gains held§1.1 / §1.2 / §2
Growth↓ + Inflation↑Rising (tail)Energy-driven stagflation leg is live — record retail diesel, mortgage rates at 6.71%, negative real wage growth; gold is the hedge but is impaired short-term by real-rate repricing; long bonds do not hedge in this quadrant§2 / §3 / §6
Growth↓ + Inflation↓FallingThe hold-camp scenario — soft August core CPI (~0.2%), PCE methodology revisions cutting measured inflation — would unwind the hawkish repricing; Citi’s June-2027 first-cut baseline is the extreme expression§1.2 / §2 / §6

Stock-bond correlation call: the live regime is the inflation/policy-driven configuration hardest for risk parity — Friday was a joint stock-and-bond selloff on a rates shock, and the yield-vs-equity inverse relationship has recently reached some of its most extreme readings in decades. In such a regime, duration no longer hedges equity risk when the trigger is repriced Fed policy; bonds hedge only in the growth-fear scenario (soft CPI → hold → yields fall → equities rally). The long end is additionally repriced by term-premium and supply forces rather than by policy expectations alone, so the hedging value of long nominal duration stays impaired until either the CPI breaks the coin flip or term premia normalize. Gold’s intraday failure below $4,400 shows it is currently hostage to real-rate repricing, but its strategic two-sided case — central-bank buying, de-dollarization flows, fiscal risk — is unchanged.

Risk-budget implication: Under a positive stock-bond return correlation driven by the rate path, express the rate view through curve structure rather than long duration: the street’s dominant expressions are front-end/belly positioning and steepeners (long 5Y plus 5s30s; 5s10s SOFR steepeners), while the long end is shorted or faded via butterfly structures targeting the rich 20-year sector. Underweight long-end nominal duration into the CPI print; keep a moderate equity beta with a quality-growth/AI tilt, since real estate, small caps and rate-sensitive segments lagged the rate move; raise the risk budget for commodities and energy as the cleanest inflation expression and for gold as the structural hedge against fiscal/term-premium tails, sized for another real-rate-driven dip. Credit carry remains usable at tight spreads but should be held in shorter duration, with CCC exposure trimmed as a two-tier signal emerges.

6. Contrarian & Tail Risks

  • Consensus fragility: the freshly restored ~58–65% September pricing rests on a jobs print, not an inflation print — and every major house anchors the decision to next week’s CPI. The contrarian stack is thick: Citi calls the market’s >50% hike pricing “very unlikely to materialize” and expects a September 16 hold [31]; Morgan Stanley and Nomura hold September-hold baselines conditional only on a major hawkish inflation surprise [14][15]; Morgan Stanley Wealth says a weak CPI would give the Fed reason to downplay the labor market’s inflation signal [9]; UBS explicitly labels its two-hike baseline low-conviction [12]; and the September 30 BEA methodology change could mechanically shave core PCE, reinforcing the dove case (Citi estimates cumulative revisions could cut y/y core PCE by about 0.35pp) [12][31][59][60]. Falsifiable pillars: (1) August core CPI prints near the ~0.2% m/m projections of Nomura/JPMorgan/Morgan Stanley [14][52][59]; (2) next week’s CPI/PPI does not surprise hot [1][3]; (3) Warsh does not face a credibility test if no hike lands despite his threshold-lowering signal [61][62]; (4) Brent holds below the ~$100 psychological zone as the Iran conflict persists [33][52].
  • Second-order transmission: the political-fiscal coupling is the live structural tail. Trump has now fused rate policy with trade policy — threatening to halt trade with US-deficit countries unless the Fed cuts — a single-source social relay goes further and claims the Fed now “controls trade policy,” flagged unverified [63][20][26][23]. Fiscal feedback is the deeper risk: trailing-12-month US federal interest expense exceeds $1.1tn (3.5% of GDP, above defense and Medicare), deficits are projected above 6% of GDP, and BofA frames a self-reinforcing loop of higher rates → larger deficit → more supply → higher term premia [13][53][42]. The demand side of the Treasury market is thinning — foreign official holdings down to ~12% and net sellers since 2024, the Norwegian wealth fund proposing to cut USTs by ~$75bn, and AI-era corporate issuance ($135bn from the five biggest tech issuers; >$200bn from hyperscalers) crowding out private duration buyers [49][43][42][21]. Transmission channels to watch: 30-year mortgage rates near 6.71% pressuring housing [9]; a “disguised tightening” equivalent to a large Fed hike already delivered by the curve per one Boston College economist [9]; and BofA’s policy “Maginot lines” — $4/gallon gasoline, 160 USD/JPY, and a 5% Treasury yield — beyond which intervention risk rises [50]. A Democratic midterm sweep (50% on Polymarket per BofA) is flagged as a major risk-off tail for US equities [50][55].
  • Source quality control: September hike odds are a band across snapshots and instruments — 58% post-NFP (CME FedWatch, from 49.4%) [2][3][4], 58.6% and 60.3% in other FedWatch reads [64][65], ~60% (fed-funds futures) [35][36], 62% (Reuters, from ~55%) [1], ~65% (short-rate futures) [9][5], versus a ~53% read in BofA’s Hartnett note and a separate NYT report of “50 percent” market odds [50][21] — sequencing matters: ~70% early in the week → ~50% after Waller (swap pricing) → 58–65% after payrolls [48]. Consensus estimates for the payrolls print vary across outlets (53k–56k) purely by polling convention [4][20][9]. Hammack’s remarks are relayed primarily through secondary wires; the Financial Juice posts are single-source / unverified [18][19], and the Geiger Capital relay of Trump’s trade threat is a social post with no underlying detail [63]. The August jobs gain itself is noisy: UBS warns a calendar effect exaggerated the seasonal adjustment [12], and one social post notes the previous month’s negative print — read by some as a reason to stop a hike — has been revised away [66].

Appendix: Additional Sources

  • [33] Barclays — the Fed “family fight”; ECB 25bp to 2.5%; BOJ near-certain September hike
  • [43] Goldman Sachs — front end again the curve driver; Norway fund UST cut proposal; 5s10s SOFR steepener
  • [14] Nomura — September-hold baseline; mild August core CPI expected
  • [47] Barclays — GSIB leverage capacity; BoE neutral near 4.5%; Treasury buyback as long-end support
  • [15] Nomura — September-hold if core CPI ~0.2%; USD/CNH and EUR/USD trades
  • [42] The Guardian — global yield instability; fiscal reassessment; AI debt issuance
  • [32] Goldman Sachs — ECB final-hike view; expects the Fed to stop hiking
  • [67] Tianfeng Securities — Warsh Jackson Hole “In Our Time”; hawkish-tilted CME repricing

This report is a macro-mechanism analysis, not investment advice.

30-day review of this series 8/6 – 9/5

  • September-hike odds round-tripped on the data-Fed seesaw. Pricing swung from a mid-August dovish low near 27% after soft payrolls and cooling CPI to a post-Jackson-Hole peak near 66–70% as Warsh’s hawkish keynote and Barr’s “act decisively” language took over, then settled back to a coin flip after Waller’s conditional-hold tilt—with the Sept-11 CPI installed as the arbiter.

  • The long end repeatedly defied both the Fed and the Treasury. The 30-year climbed to 2007-era highs above 5.3% despite Bessent’s Aug-19 buyback expansion, whose relief faded within days; the driver narrative shifted from rate-path repricing to a term-premium and real-rate wall.

  • The policy default flipped from “hold unless data force action” to “hike unless data excuse it,” then partially reversed. Warsh’s Aug-28 debut and Barr’s remarks set the hawkish marker, but Williams and Waller’s pushback restored a genuine two-variable fight over whether disinflation or hot core readings govern the September decision.

  • Fed communication itself became a market-moving storyline. Warsh’s “play the ball, not the referee” guidance pullback, the meeting-count reform trial balloon, and the renewed Cook-removal attempt each lifted the policy-uncertainty premium, making every data release behave like a mini-FOMC.

  • The dollar weakened while gold absorbed the fiscal-credibility risk. The DXY slid from near 100 to three-month lows below 99 as Treasury activism fueled de-dollarization chatter, while gold oscillated between rate-driven corrections near $4,400 and debasement-led peaks above $4,600.

  • Global central banks tightened around the Fed’s indecision. BOJ September-hike odds consolidated near 75–84% and the ECB’s path hardened, while coordinated yen intervention and the FIMA channel added a second-order Treasury-demand layer to the long-end story.

Sources67

  1. Fed rate hike back in focus after strong jobs report Reuters Score 64
  2. 超强厄尔尼诺搅动粮市；美国非农爆表抬升加息预期｜一周热点回顾 第一财经-资讯 Score 61
  3. 非农爆表提振加息预期，美股指下挫，存储与光通信逆势走强，黄金跌近1% 华尔街见闻 Score 61
  4. Investors zero in on August inflation data in the week ahead after yields spike to levels not seen in years CNBC Score 64
  5. 美国8月非农近3倍于预期，交易员重燃加息押注 格隆汇快讯 Score 62
  6. Nick Timiraos | August Jobs Report Removes an Obstacle to a Fed Hike WSJ Score 66
  7. The August inflation data still seem likely to drive the decision to hike or hold in September, but the solid August employment data at a minimum remo... Twitter·财经快讯 Score 62
  8. “新美联储通讯社”：8月就业数据扫清加息障碍，9月加息静待通胀“定调” 华尔街见闻 Score 63
  9. 悬念又来了！非农再度扭转加息预期，特朗普彻底坐不住了 第一财经-资讯 Score 64
  10. “稳定”的劳动力市场意味着降息将推迟 外资研报 Score 61
  11. 牛津经济研究院：劳动力市场并非通胀压力来源 格隆汇快讯 Score 60
  12. 瑞银：预计美联储9月和12月各加息25个基点，联邦基金利率年底目标上调至4.00%-4.25% 外资研报 Score 64
  13. 美银美国周度经济报告：通胀粘性支撑9月加息，财政赤字与利率反馈 loop 成隐忧 外资研报 Score 65
  14. 野村美国周度经济报告：通胀动能减弱，美联储9月或按兵不动 外资研报 Score 62
  15. 野村：美联储或按兵不动，维持看空美元及多项外汇交易策略 外资研报 Score 63
  16. 美联储哈玛克：通胀仍过高，现在是采取行动的时候 格隆汇快讯 Score 62
  17. 美联储哈玛克：现在是美联储加息以控制通胀的时候 格隆汇快讯 Score 67
  18. Fed's Hammack: Fed policy not restrictive and inflation is too high - LinkedIn Twitter·财经快讯 Score 63
  19. Fed's Hammack: local contacts indicate time to raise rates to curb inflation Twitter·财经快讯 Score 64
  20. 特朗普施压美联储 虎嗅 Score 62
  21. The job market in 2035: More nurses, fewer secretaries. NYT Score 65
  22. 全球固定收益周报：利率制度转换与宏观组合更新 外资研报 Score 63
  23. What to know about the report. NYT Score 63
  24. 强劲非农数据难阻涨势：新兴市场货币连涨10周，创2007年以来最长连涨纪录 华尔街见闻 Score 61
  25. 美联储内部的分歧：9月议息会议前瞻 外资研报 Score 65
  26. 特朗普：非农打破所有预期(除了我的！)，降息吧 格隆汇快讯 Score 61
  27. 超预期非农推高加息押注，特朗普再度喊话“降息”！ 华尔街见闻 Score 61
  28. 格隆汇9月4日｜美国白宫国家经济委员会主任哈塞特：通胀已得到控制，加息是人们认为的摆在桌面上的选项，我们尊重美联储的独立性。 格隆汇快讯 Score 62
  29. 上调收益率预测：高收益率制度确立 外资研报 Score 63
  30. 紧缩政策遇上AI资本支出：风险目前具有韧性 外资研报 Score 63
  31. 每日更新：从沃勒讲话中获悉的信息 外资研报 Score 63
  32. 欧洲央行前瞻：再次加息但缺乏指引 外资研报 Score 60
  33. 全球经济周报：美联储内部“家庭纷争”指引，欧日央行加息在即 外资研报 Score 64
  34. 非农重燃加息预期，特朗普却喊降息，美联储分歧摆上台面！美伊新一轮交火波及海湾多国。日元再度异动，加息交易升温？债市抛售潮蔓延至新兴市场。本周你错过哪些... 金十-快讯 Score 62
  35. 美国非农意外强劲，9月加息概率升至约60%，市场紧盯下周CPI 虎嗅 Score 65
  36. 非农意外强劲，9月加息概率升至约60%，美股债同步重定价 华尔街见闻 Score 65
  37. 美国8月新增16.2万个非农岗位，劳动力市场陷入“低招聘、低解雇”困局 澎湃新闻 Score 61
  38. 强劲非农冲击下加息预期升温、美债遭遇抛售，美股为何不受影响？ 华尔街见闻 Score 66
  39. 安联分析师：就业稳定与工资负增长冲突，令美联储决策更加复杂 格隆汇快讯 Score 62
  40. 美联储年底前加息概率超83% 格隆汇快讯 Score 65
  41. 贝莱德：就业数据超预期后，CPI的重要性更加凸显 格隆汇快讯 Score 62
  42. Instability in global bond markets is rising. What are the knock-on effects? The Guardian Score 60
  43. 关注价格：全球收益率维持高位，优选美债5s10s做陡策略 外资研报 Score 61
  44. A Wild Week for Global Bonds Ends With Yields Near Where They Started WSJ Score 60
  45. 金融状况与流动性监测：价格指标收紧，数量指标仍具支持性 外资研报 Score 67
  46. 美国国债市场日报：建议做空20年期国债相对价值 外资研报 Score 65
  47. 全球利率周报：多空拉锯 外资研报 Score 63
  48. 非农大超预期，美股股指期货跳水，Lululemon盘前跌19%，黄金失守4400，日元下跌 华尔街见闻 Score 61
  49. 全球利率与外汇观点：外汇储备叙事再审视 外资研报 Score 63
  50. 资金流向周报：中期选举风险与资产配置策略 外资研报 Score 66
  51. 欧洲央行前瞻：预计加息至2.5%并释放鹰派框架指引 外资研报 Score 61
  52. 全球数据观察：经济增长上行风险增加，主要央行面临加息压力 外资研报 Score 65
  53. 全球宏观经济周报：是科恩日还是伯南克日？ 外资研报 Score 61
  54. 美国固定收益周报：维持做空10年期美债，关注期限溢价上行风险 外资研报 Score 61
  55. 8月全球投资十大主线 一瑜中的 Score 67
  56. 政策进入蓄力期——政治局会议的新变化（国金宏观张馨月） 雪涛宏观笔记 Score 60
  57. 全球利率周报：债券下跌，秋季将至：九月债券促销 外资研报 Score 63
  58. 是什么推动了全球债券收益率的上升？ 资管报告 Score 62
  59. 美国经济学周报：给去通胀一个机会 外资研报 Score 64
  60. 美国聚焦：通胀趋势与转折点 外资研报 Score 61
  61. 机构：下周CPI将决定美联储是否行动 沃什需维护信誉 格隆汇快讯 Score 64
  62. 机构：下周CPI将决定美联储是否行动 沃什需维护信誉 格隆汇快讯 Score 64
  63. I guess this means Fed controls trade policy now too. Twitter·宏观市场 Score 66
  64. 美联储9月加息25个基点的概率为58.6% 格隆汇快讯 Score 65
  65. 非农数据公布后，美联储9月加息概率升至60.3% 格隆汇快讯 Score 64
  66. The report came with hawkish implications relative to the Fed's own labor market assessment. But I do find it remarkable that observed trend of total ... Twitter·财经快讯 Score 62
  67. 超强厄尔尼诺来袭 开达策略知行 Score 60